Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And again you ASSUME....LOLFunny;
Tell me, Do you believe your failed models? Why?
Where do you teach people about AGW lies? Certainly not a legitimate scientific institution. Are you talking about your beer club or something?
I am not as stupid as you are... Please get back to topic. Tell me, do you believe your failed modeling? Why do you believe it?
I don't think you teach anybody about climate science. You should go do some research and listen to what actual scientists have to say about the topic.
Yet you never address the facts I presented you? Now why would that be? So interested in my personal endevours and not so interested in the facts you refuse to address.
Are you simply a left wing hack who is set on finding me and trying to use force an fear to shut me up? Is that your game?
Some dumb redneck that thinks he understands climate science better than actual climate scientists is not worth that kind of effort. You should endeavor to have more than a rudimentary understanding of English before you start lying about your academic credentials.
Looks like Conservative misinformation is working
It's seriously embarrassing. A bunch of fuck mouthed rednecks from the United States have unraveled the global conspiracy being pushed by some of the most educated people on Earth. Right...
Waiting for that single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...and it will never be forthcoming because no such evidence exists...and since no such evidence exists, what else other than a dump truck full of money and political power might bring naturally skeptical people into agreement on anything?
Every other nation on earth recognizes the dangers of global warmingLooks like Conservative misinformation is working
It's seriously embarrassing. A bunch of fuck mouthed rednecks from the United States have unraveled the global conspiracy being pushed by some of the most educated people on Earth. Right...
Conservatives in this country have convinced people it is fake news
And again you ASSUME....LOLWhere do you teach people about AGW lies? Certainly not a legitimate scientific institution. Are you talking about your beer club or something?
I am not as stupid as you are... Please get back to topic. Tell me, do you believe your failed modeling? Why do you believe it?
I don't think you teach anybody about climate science. You should go do some research and listen to what actual scientists have to say about the topic.
Yet you never address the facts I presented you? Now why would that be? So interested in my personal endevours and not so interested in the facts you refuse to address.
Are you simply a left wing hack who is set on finding me and trying to use force an fear to shut me up? Is that your game?
Some dumb redneck that thinks he understands climate science better than actual climate scientists is not worth that kind of effort. You should endeavor to have more than a rudimentary understanding of English before you start lying about your academic credentials.
You should endeavor to learn to research material for yourself rather than depend on scam artists to tell you what you should think. Had you done any actual research, you would realize that there is not a single piece of observed, measured evidence out there that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.
Looks like Conservative misinformation is working
It's seriously embarrassing. A bunch of fuck mouthed rednecks from the United States have unraveled the global conspiracy being pushed by some of the most educated people on Earth. Right...
Waiting for that single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...and it will never be forthcoming because no such evidence exists...and since no such evidence exists, what else other than a dump truck full of money and political power might bring naturally skeptical people into agreement on anything?
You should break it down for those scientists all over the world that just don't get it like you do.
And again you ASSUME....LOL
I am not as stupid as you are... Please get back to topic. Tell me, do you believe your failed modeling? Why do you believe it?
I don't think you teach anybody about climate science. You should go do some research and listen to what actual scientists have to say about the topic.
Yet you never address the facts I presented you? Now why would that be? So interested in my personal endevours and not so interested in the facts you refuse to address.
Are you simply a left wing hack who is set on finding me and trying to use force an fear to shut me up? Is that your game?
Some dumb redneck that thinks he understands climate science better than actual climate scientists is not worth that kind of effort. You should endeavor to have more than a rudimentary understanding of English before you start lying about your academic credentials.
You should endeavor to learn to research material for yourself rather than depend on scam artists to tell you what you should think. Had you done any actual research, you would realize that there is not a single piece of observed, measured evidence out there that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.
I wonder if it's possible to measure the amount of stupidity it takes to believe scientists all over the world are in on a global warming conspiracy.
Tell me, How are your models doing at mimicking the system they were designed to model?As I have a Masters in Atmospheric Physics I find your comment insulting...Nope..I guess Europe, Asia and the scientists who know more about it than anybody need to catch up with dumb ass Americans.
The EU is censoring anything that doesn't match their socialist takeover agenda.... Can't have reasoning minds get the facts on the scam..
The world would laugh at us if the abject stupidity in this country wasn't so dangerous. I've given up on trying to convince people like you that scientists the world over are not in on a conspiracy to scam us into giving them grant money. It's enough to know historians will look back and talk about how people like you were stupid as fuck.
As a scientist, you are the ones who are climbing a tree that is on fire.. Your facts are derived from models that have NO PREDICTIVE POWER... Your making assumptions from a position of ignorance.. Fooled by your toys... Until you come to grips with empirical evidence you will always be a dupe for whatever folly your told is true. I deal in facts you can prove, not fantasy you wish were happening...
You'd think somebody that went to college for 6 years would be a little better at typing English. The scientists are not lying to us. People like you are a detriment to our species.
View attachment 206323
Looks like Conservative misinformation is working
It's seriously embarrassing. A bunch of fuck mouthed rednecks from the United States have unraveled the global conspiracy being pushed by some of the most educated people on Earth. Right...
Waiting for that single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...and it will never be forthcoming because no such evidence exists...and since no such evidence exists, what else other than a dump truck full of money and political power might bring naturally skeptical people into agreement on anything?
You should break it down for those scientists all over the world that just don't get it like you do.
And let the dodging begin. Its always the same with you dupes...you talk as if you had a clue...like you have seen the evidence and it easily convinced you...but when someone asks for even one piece of observed, measured evidence, it is like someone opened a logical fallacy flood gate...rather than slap me down with that single shred of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability, you go into dodge mode...and why? Because that single piece of evidence I asked for does not exist.
Thank You for confirming you are a political hack. You have no intention to discuss the topic and you insist on speaking from a position of ignorance...And again you ASSUME....LOLFunny;
Tell me, Do you believe your failed models? Why?
Where do you teach people about AGW lies? Certainly not a legitimate scientific institution. Are you talking about your beer club or something?
I am not as stupid as you are... Please get back to topic. Tell me, do you believe your failed modeling? Why do you believe it?
I don't think you teach anybody about climate science. You should go do some research and listen to what actual scientists have to say about the topic.
Yet you never address the facts I presented you? Now why would that be? So interested in my personal endevours and not so interested in the facts you refuse to address.
Are you simply a left wing hack who is set on finding me and trying to use force an fear to shut me up? Is that your game?
Some dumb redneck that thinks he understands climate science better than actual climate scientists is not worth that kind of effort. You should endeavor to have more than a rudimentary understanding of English before you start lying about your academic credentials.
Thank You for confirming you are a political hack. You have no intention to discuss the topic and you insist on speaking from a position of ignorance...And again you ASSUME....LOLWhere do you teach people about AGW lies? Certainly not a legitimate scientific institution. Are you talking about your beer club or something?
I am not as stupid as you are... Please get back to topic. Tell me, do you believe your failed modeling? Why do you believe it?
I don't think you teach anybody about climate science. You should go do some research and listen to what actual scientists have to say about the topic.
Yet you never address the facts I presented you? Now why would that be? So interested in my personal endevours and not so interested in the facts you refuse to address.
Are you simply a left wing hack who is set on finding me and trying to use force an fear to shut me up? Is that your game?
Some dumb redneck that thinks he understands climate science better than actual climate scientists is not worth that kind of effort. You should endeavor to have more than a rudimentary understanding of English before you start lying about your academic credentials.
Nice attempt at Saul Alyinsky's Rules for Radicals by th way. Good effort..
You hit three or four of your rules in an attempt to discredit and bait me.... Now kindly FUCK OFF. You are not worth my time.
The Charts origination is Dr Roy Spencer and Dr John Christy, University of Alabama (At Huntsville) aka; UAH. It is a compilation of CMP models (Global Climate Models) and the actual balloon data sets (empirically observed data) of earths physical atmosphere.Tell me, How are your models doing at mimicking the system they were designed to model?As I have a Masters in Atmospheric Physics I find your comment insulting...Nope..
The EU is censoring anything that doesn't match their socialist takeover agenda.... Can't have reasoning minds get the facts on the scam..
The world would laugh at us if the abject stupidity in this country wasn't so dangerous. I've given up on trying to convince people like you that scientists the world over are not in on a conspiracy to scam us into giving them grant money. It's enough to know historians will look back and talk about how people like you were stupid as fuck.
As a scientist, you are the ones who are climbing a tree that is on fire.. Your facts are derived from models that have NO PREDICTIVE POWER... Your making assumptions from a position of ignorance.. Fooled by your toys... Until you come to grips with empirical evidence you will always be a dupe for whatever folly your told is true. I deal in facts you can prove, not fantasy you wish were happening...
You'd think somebody that went to college for 6 years would be a little better at typing English. The scientists are not lying to us. People like you are a detriment to our species.
View attachment 206323
I'm curious where all the data in this chart comes from. I can't interpret the various labels; are they each a different climate model? And the balloon and satellite data sets, where are those from?
I'm not questioning the data's validity, I don't know enough about it to know whether that would be a reasonable response.
There is endless nonsense on the internet for unscientific dimwits like you to cling to while you say with a straight face that the scientists are wrong. I've danced this dance before and it's a waste of time. You've already made up your mind, so I'll just laugh at you instead.
There is endless nonsense on the internet for unscientific dimwits like you to cling to while you say with a straight face that the scientists are wrong. I've danced this dance before and it's a waste of time. You've already made up your mind, so I'll just laugh at you instead.
Shuck and jive....dodge and weave....tuck tail and run...it is always the same with you guys. Here I am, asking not for absolute proof that we are causing cliamte change...not even an overwhelming body of evidence that we are causing climate change...I am asking for a single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability and you can't produce it...all of climate science can't produce it.
That being the case, what exactly do you think has all these scientists convinced.
And laughing, when you are being made a laughing stock presents some interesting psychology...you can't provide a single shred of actual evidence to support your position and when called on it, you laugh. ......interesting.
There is endless nonsense on the internet for unscientific dimwits like you to cling to while you say with a straight face that the scientists are wrong. I've danced this dance before and it's a waste of time. You've already made up your mind, so I'll just laugh at you instead.
Shuck and jive....dodge and weave....tuck tail and run...it is always the same with you guys. Here I am, asking not for absolute proof that we are causing cliamte change...not even an overwhelming body of evidence that we are causing climate change...I am asking for a single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability and you can't produce it...all of climate science can't produce it.
That being the case, what exactly do you think has all these scientists convinced.
And laughing, when you are being made a laughing stock presents some interesting psychology...you can't provide a single shred of actual evidence to support your position and when called on it, you laugh. ......interesting.
No, no I get it now. There's no evidence; you're right. It's all a big conspiracy. Scientists all over the world are lying to the public so they can help spread globalism and socialism. How did I not see it before? Thank you Dingus. My life is forever changed.
There is endless nonsense on the internet for unscientific dimwits like you to cling to while you say with a straight face that the scientists are wrong. I've danced this dance before and it's a waste of time. You've already made up your mind, so I'll just laugh at you instead.
Shuck and jive....dodge and weave....tuck tail and run...it is always the same with you guys. Here I am, asking not for absolute proof that we are causing cliamte change...not even an overwhelming body of evidence that we are causing climate change...I am asking for a single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability and you can't produce it...all of climate science can't produce it.
That being the case, what exactly do you think has all these scientists convinced.
And laughing, when you are being made a laughing stock presents some interesting psychology...you can't provide a single shred of actual evidence to support your position and when called on it, you laugh. ......interesting.
No, no I get it now. There's no evidence; you're right. It's all a big conspiracy. Scientists all over the world are lying to the public so they can help spread globalism and socialism. How did I not see it before? Thank you Dingus. My life is forever changed.
And still not a single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.
Here, let me show you what it looks like to provide evidence that supports your position....
Here is a gold standard temperature reconstruction derived from the GISP2 ice cores taken from above the Arctic Circle. Even climate science acknowledges that ice cores are the gold standard for temperature reconstruction. Note the present temperature relative to the past 10,000 years.
Here is another gold standard temperature reconstruction derived from the Vostok ice cores taken from Antarctica.
Again, note the present temperature relative to the past 10,000 years. Close examination of the two graphs shows very similar temperature spikes over the past 10K years. Now, if you can think of a rational, scientifically valid reason why gold standard ice cores taken from opposite poles indicate that most of the past 10,000 years was warmer than the present but the globe in between was not, I would like to hear it.
Then there is this...dozens of studies showing the past was warmer than the present.
Project: Mapping the Medieval Warm Period | Die kalte Sonne
So I have supported my position with gold standard temperature reconstructions and dozens of peer reviewed, published papers which show that the past was warmer than the present...and I have just barely scratched the surface. What do you have? answer: nothing at all but impotent bluster.
It is nothing but hot air... It has no point other than the top of its head.. I learned that from my interactions with it.. If your waiting for evidence you will be waiting for a very long time..There is endless nonsense on the internet for unscientific dimwits like you to cling to while you say with a straight face that the scientists are wrong. I've danced this dance before and it's a waste of time. You've already made up your mind, so I'll just laugh at you instead.
Shuck and jive....dodge and weave....tuck tail and run...it is always the same with you guys. Here I am, asking not for absolute proof that we are causing cliamte change...not even an overwhelming body of evidence that we are causing climate change...I am asking for a single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability and you can't produce it...all of climate science can't produce it.
That being the case, what exactly do you think has all these scientists convinced.
And laughing, when you are being made a laughing stock presents some interesting psychology...you can't provide a single shred of actual evidence to support your position and when called on it, you laugh. ......interesting.
No, no I get it now. There's no evidence; you're right. It's all a big conspiracy. Scientists all over the world are lying to the public so they can help spread globalism and socialism. How did I not see it before? Thank you Dingus. My life is forever changed.
And still not a single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.
Here, let me show you what it looks like to provide evidence that supports your position....
Here is a gold standard temperature reconstruction derived from the GISP2 ice cores taken from above the Arctic Circle. Even climate science acknowledges that ice cores are the gold standard for temperature reconstruction. Note the present temperature relative to the past 10,000 years.
Here is another gold standard temperature reconstruction derived from the Vostok ice cores taken from Antarctica.
Again, note the present temperature relative to the past 10,000 years. Close examination of the two graphs shows very similar temperature spikes over the past 10K years. Now, if you can think of a rational, scientifically valid reason why gold standard ice cores taken from opposite poles indicate that most of the past 10,000 years was warmer than the present but the globe in between was not, I would like to hear it.
Then there is this...dozens of studies showing the past was warmer than the present.
Project: Mapping the Medieval Warm Period | Die kalte Sonne
So I have supported my position with gold standard temperature reconstructions and dozens of peer reviewed, published papers which show that the past was warmer than the present...and I have just barely scratched the surface. What do you have? answer: nothing at all but impotent bluster.
It is nothing but hot air... It has no point other than the top of its head.. I learned that from my interactions with it.. If your waiting for evidence you will be waiting for a very long time..There is endless nonsense on the internet for unscientific dimwits like you to cling to while you say with a straight face that the scientists are wrong. I've danced this dance before and it's a waste of time. You've already made up your mind, so I'll just laugh at you instead.
Shuck and jive....dodge and weave....tuck tail and run...it is always the same with you guys. Here I am, asking not for absolute proof that we are causing cliamte change...not even an overwhelming body of evidence that we are causing climate change...I am asking for a single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability and you can't produce it...all of climate science can't produce it.
That being the case, what exactly do you think has all these scientists convinced.
And laughing, when you are being made a laughing stock presents some interesting psychology...you can't provide a single shred of actual evidence to support your position and when called on it, you laugh. ......interesting.
No, no I get it now. There's no evidence; you're right. It's all a big conspiracy. Scientists all over the world are lying to the public so they can help spread globalism and socialism. How did I not see it before? Thank you Dingus. My life is forever changed.
And still not a single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.
Here, let me show you what it looks like to provide evidence that supports your position....
Here is a gold standard temperature reconstruction derived from the GISP2 ice cores taken from above the Arctic Circle. Even climate science acknowledges that ice cores are the gold standard for temperature reconstruction. Note the present temperature relative to the past 10,000 years.
Here is another gold standard temperature reconstruction derived from the Vostok ice cores taken from Antarctica.
Again, note the present temperature relative to the past 10,000 years. Close examination of the two graphs shows very similar temperature spikes over the past 10K years. Now, if you can think of a rational, scientifically valid reason why gold standard ice cores taken from opposite poles indicate that most of the past 10,000 years was warmer than the present but the globe in between was not, I would like to hear it.
Then there is this...dozens of studies showing the past was warmer than the present.
Project: Mapping the Medieval Warm Period | Die kalte Sonne
So I have supported my position with gold standard temperature reconstructions and dozens of peer reviewed, published papers which show that the past was warmer than the present...and I have just barely scratched the surface. What do you have? answer: nothing at all but impotent bluster.
There is endless nonsense on the internet for unscientific dimwits like you to cling to while you say with a straight face that the scientists are wrong. I've danced this dance before and it's a waste of time. You've already made up your mind, so I'll just laugh at you instead.
Shuck and jive....dodge and weave....tuck tail and run...it is always the same with you guys. Here I am, asking not for absolute proof that we are causing cliamte change...not even an overwhelming body of evidence that we are causing climate change...I am asking for a single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability and you can't produce it...all of climate science can't produce it.
That being the case, what exactly do you think has all these scientists convinced.
And laughing, when you are being made a laughing stock presents some interesting psychology...you can't provide a single shred of actual evidence to support your position and when called on it, you laugh. ......interesting.
No, no I get it now. There's no evidence; you're right. It's all a big conspiracy. Scientists all over the world are lying to the public so they can help spread globalism and socialism. How did I not see it before? Thank you Dingus. My life is forever changed.
And still not a single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.
Here, let me show you what it looks like to provide evidence that supports your position....
Here is a gold standard temperature reconstruction derived from the GISP2 ice cores taken from above the Arctic Circle. Even climate science acknowledges that ice cores are the gold standard for temperature reconstruction. Note the present temperature relative to the past 10,000 years.
Here is another gold standard temperature reconstruction derived from the Vostok ice cores taken from Antarctica.
Again, note the present temperature relative to the past 10,000 years. Close examination of the two graphs shows very similar temperature spikes over the past 10K years. Now, if you can think of a rational, scientifically valid reason why gold standard ice cores taken from opposite poles indicate that most of the past 10,000 years was warmer than the present but the globe in between was not, I would like to hear it.
Then there is this...dozens of studies showing the past was warmer than the present.
Project: Mapping the Medieval Warm Period | Die kalte Sonne
So I have supported my position with gold standard temperature reconstructions and dozens of peer reviewed, published papers which show that the past was warmer than the present...and I have just barely scratched the surface. What do you have? answer: nothing at all but impotent bluster.
Thank you for enlightening me, Dingus. We need to let the scientists know. Where should we start?
Remember this, from the first Republican President?
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
Looks like the Global Warming Scam has run its course.
"New Gallup Poll: Americans do not even mention global warming as a problem – 36 ‘problems’ cited, but not climate
According to the latest Gallup poll, NOBODY thinks global warming is our most important problem, contrary to what NRCM, Audubon and CLF sock puppets tell us."
New Gallup Poll: Americans do not even mention global warming as a problem – 36 ‘problems’ cited, but not climate
Oh, noooozzzzz!!!!
Now we're gonna have to find a whole new bunch of human piñatas!!!
We start by pointing out to the idiots of the world that they are dupes
