Long Covid has surpassed asthma as the most common chronic illness among US children

Results​

We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage
2005 Dude.

Screenshot 2025-06-04 at 11.08.27 AM.webp
 

Can you read English?

Here's you: "hydroxychloroquine has not been proven to be an effective treatment for COVID-19."

Here's the report you either didn't read or don't understand: "chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage"
 
Can you read English?

Here's you: "hydroxychloroquine has not been proven to be an effective treatment for COVID-19."

Here's the report you either didn't read or don't understand: "chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage"
I read it, that's how I discovered the report was from 2005.
 
I read it, that's how I discovered the report was from 2005.

Wow!

You're amazing!!

How about this: "chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage"

Maybe just take one or two words at a time
 
Wow!

You're amazing!!

How about this: "chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage"

Maybe just take one or two words at a time
Look Frank, I can do the same thing.
Here, read this.

📊

Major randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including:

  • RECOVERY Trial (UK)
  • SOLIDARITY Trial (WHO)
  • ORCHID Trial (NIH, USA)
...all found no meaningful benefit of hydroxychloroquine in:

  • Preventing COVID-19
  • Reducing symptom duration
  • Lowering hospitalization or death rates
Additionally, some patients experienced serious side effects, particularly heart rhythm problems (QT prolongation).
 
Chloroquine and ivermectin are not effective treatments for Covid 19.

If you find anti-vax conspiracy nuts in your business, in your church, in your school - run them out.

If not, keep their children away from your children. Otherwise, you could end up down the road with grandchildren you will have to disinherit.
 
Chloroquine and ivermectin are not effective treatments for Covid 19.

If you find anti-vax conspiracy nuts in your business, in your church, in your school - run them out.

If not, keep their children away from your children. Otherwise, you could end up down the road with grandchildren you will have to disinherit.

That's not what Fauci and NIH said in 2005

Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread - PMC

"Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by a newly discovered coronavirus (SARS-CoV). No effective prophylactic or post-exposure therapy is currently available.

We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage"
 
Back
Top Bottom