LOL: Adam Schiff and Kash Patel go around in circles at Hearing

[Dekster]

Patel telling Booker it was his time, not Booker's showed just how entitled this administration is. No longer a democrat, but I will be celebrating with them when this administration is toast.

 

[Leo123]

so why hasn't HE been impeached?

When will the Trump admin get around to that project?

I mean, can't the president initiate something like that? Oh wait, I think it has to originate in the House.

James Comer!

Article II, Section 4 says

"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

"neither the text nor early historical sources precisely delineate who qualifies as a civil officer."

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S4-2/ALDE_00000689/

Read it, get educated, stop being dumb.

 

[forkintheroad7]

The leftists who support the disgruntled, fired FBI folks who filed the lawsuit complaining of political motivations

are OK with politically motivated firings

but only when Dim admins do them

 

[forkintheroad7]

Patel telling Booker it was his time, not Booker's showed just how entitled this administration is. No longer a democrat, but I will be celebrating with them when this administration is toast.

Go TRUMP Admin!

 

[Seymour Flops]

Patel telling Booker it was his time, not Booker's showed just how entitled this administration is. No longer a democrat, but I will be celebrating with them when this administration is toast.

Always the "not Democrats" who are willing to twist and turn to blame Trump and Trumpers for the failures of "not my party."

It was Patel's time, because the chairman granted him time to respond since Booker had talked over Patel every time Patel tried to answer the question.

Booker's time was over. He used it to berate and rant, instead of allowing the witness to answer. So the chair gave the witness time. But Booker felt entitled to continue to talk over him.

Here's the clip:



I know you're "no longer a Democrat," but do you think Booker is really that angry, or is it just bad acting?

If he's really that angry, he should take early retirement before he blows a gasket.

 

[BackAgain]

He built his rapid rise in Trump world to creating manure.

MissFit ^ can’t even get basic prepositions right.

Oh. Also, its claim is just another fiction pawned off as if it was real.

 

[forkintheroad7]

Always the "not Democrats" who are willing to twist and turn to blame Trump and Trumpers for the failures of "not my party."

It was Patel's time, because the chairman granted him time to respond since Booker had talked over Patel every time Patel tried to answer the question.

Booker's time was over. He used it to berate and rant, instead of allowing the witness to answer. So the chair gave the witness time. But Booker felt entitled to continue to talk over him.

Here's the clip:



I know you're "no longer a Democrat," but do you think Booker is really that angry, or is it just bad acting?

If he's really that angry, he should take early retirement before he blows a gasket.

The women behind Booker are thinking to themselves:

"Wow, that Kash dude is kind of cute"

 

[Seymour Flops]

Patel and Repbublicans used this hearing to float a new trial balloon: that Epstein trafficked young women, including minors, to himself and the question is who else "if anyone" did he traffic them to? In other words, the only name on "Epstein's List" is Epstein himelf.

Clever, but the cleverness comes too late.

Very few people, if any, will ever believe anything other than that there are powerful men to whom Epstein trafficked girls, and powerful men in government who have protected those men from being exposed since the Obama Administration.

They will ride out the clock. People who want "the names, dammit!" will tire of asking for them long before powerful men tire of maintaining their power.

 

[forkintheroad7]

Always the "not Democrats" who are willing to twist and turn to blame Trump and Trumpers for the failures of "not my party."

It was Patel's time, because the chairman granted him time to respond since Booker had talked over Patel every time Patel tried to answer the question.

Booker's time was over. He used it to berate and rant, instead of allowing the witness to answer. So the chair gave the witness time. But Booker felt entitled to continue to talk over him.

Here's the clip:



I know you're "no longer a Democrat," but do you think Booker is really that angry, or is it just bad acting?

If he's really that angry, he should take early retirement before he blows a gasket.

LOL

Yeh, I was wondering the same thing: is Booker really that angry or just acting? If you hve to ask, you kind of know the answer. I tend to think he is acting. The reason I say that is that the left HATE children and want to murder as many as they can in the womb... therefore depriving them of ALL rights the rest of us have in one violent act, rights they CLAIM to always care about (but they lie 24/7).

When the leftists care about THAT, then we can believe they care about Kash Patel and his agency getting child traffickers, which they ARE .. Booker is just another liar in the Party of Liars

 

[BothWings]

No, the very first thing is: Schiff is a proven liar and you're believing his shit.

Or just supporting it.

 

[airplanemechanic]

What a ridiculous claim.

Patel isn’t very bright. He only knows how to toss around right wing red meat on Fox for the Knick;e draggers to Bob their heads to.

The fact that someone as classy as Patel has to even LOOK at someone who needed a preemptive pardon from poopypants is ridiculous. **** pencil neck.

 

[LeftofLeft]

He built his rapid rise in Trump world to creating manure.

By all means, please try and defend Schiff.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I saw that exchange. Patel was no holds barred brilliant.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

so why hasn't HE been impeached?

When will the Trump admin get around to that project?

I mean, can't the president initiate something like that? Oh wait, I think it has to originate in the House.

James Comer!

Because you cannot impeach a member of the House or Senate.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Always the "not Democrats" who are willing to twist and turn to blame Trump and Trumpers for the failures of "not my party."

It was Patel's time, because the chairman granted him time to respond since Booker had talked over Patel every time Patel tried to answer the question.

Booker's time was over. He used it to berate and rant, instead of allowing the witness to answer. So the chair gave the witness time. But Booker felt entitled to continue to talk over him.

Here's the clip:



I know you're "no longer a Democrat," but do you think Booker is really that angry, or is it just bad acting?

If he's really that angry, he should take early retirement before he blows a gasket.

Spartacus has decided to stay in the closet and not come out as he recently announced he is engaged to his beard.

 

[forkintheroad7]

Patel was probably thinking through this Booker questioning:

"Geez, the things I have to put up with being head of the FBI... Listening to this Booker guy is like being in Hell"

 

[forkintheroad7]

Because you cannot impeach a member of the House or Senate.

I heard you can. And if not, things should be changed so you can.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I heard you can. And if not, things should be changed so you can.

Try reading your Constitution. I taught this fact in my government and history classes.

The House could have or the Senate can remove him at any time they want.

 

[Dante]

In 2017 Schiff went on Meet The Press and said he's seen "evidence that is not circumstantial and very worthy of investigation" with regard to Russia Gate. He also claimed Russians delivered help to the Trump campaign. When he was pressed he merely said the evidence was 'classified.' Schiff helped launch the first false impeachment against Trump.

DOJ Report Exposes Adam Schiff’s Lies and Leaks | @amacforamerica

A critical look at Adam Schiff's rise and controversies, including classified leaks and Russia collusion claims.

amac.us

Russia did provide help to the Trump campaign. Even AI has that one:

AI Overview

It is well-documented by multiple U.S. government investigations that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election with the intent of helping Donald Trump's campaign
. However, these investigations found that while the Trump campaign welcomed Russian help, there was not sufficient evidence to establish a criminal conspiracy with the Russian government

WAKE UP!

 

[Dante]

In 2017 Schiff went on Meet The Press and said he's seen "evidence that is not circumstantial and very worthy of investigation" with regard to Russia Gate. He also claimed Russians delivered help to the Trump campaign. When he was pressed he merely said the evidence was 'classified.' Schiff helped launch the first false impeachment against Trump.

DOJ Report Exposes Adam Schiff’s Lies and Leaks | @amacforamerica

A critical look at Adam Schiff's rise and controversies, including classified leaks and Russia collusion claims.

amac.us

Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election

The report purposely does not come to a final conclusion, as the other reports did, about whether there is enough evidence that Trump’s campaign coordinated or colluded with Russia to sway the election, leaving its findings open to partisan interpretation.

www.pbs.org