Logical next step?

[martybegan]

He can think whatever he wants. It doesn't give him the right to act without justification.

All he did was investigate. And tell people to peacefully protest.

In the end Biden took office at the time he was supposed to.

 

[Curried Goats]

Go back to your urban plantation that the white democrats built for you, and obey your democrat massas, the fact that you fail to realize what the left has done means you deserve the line of bull they feed you!

Are all you conservatives morons who don't understand how plantations worked? This is a poorly constructed insult that just makes you look stupid.

1. Slaves built the wealth that supported plantains and this country. Not the plantation owners. They confiscated the wealth generated by the slaves.

2. I fully support the continued take over of the Democratic party by minorities. I don't have any issue putting a political knife into Joe Biden the moment it becomes politically advantageous for us to do so. Us being progressives.

3. That makes your whole insult imaginary. A fantasy. And how insulted do you imagine I am by you doing dress up and make believe?

 

[Marener]

All he did was investigate. And tell people to peacefully protest.

In the end Biden took office at the time he was supposed to.

That's simply not true and you continue to ignore any document facts to the contrary.

Like when he tried to instruct the DoJ to publish a statement saying that the election was corrupt despite there being no factual basis for the statement.

How long are you going to avoid acknowledging this?

 

[Mac-7]

A judge recently overturned an election snd ordered a new one held

 

[OKTexas]

Raising the question how is the life of the mother threatened by an unviable fetus, specifically.

A question you refused to answer.

Don't strain yourself. We know you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

Do you know what unviable means? An ectopic pregnancy or a dead or dying fetus is a danger to the mother and it's you that keeps throwing around general terms. So FOAD

.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

First, I'm not advocating for any harm to come to trump, or any of his supporters, but in the light of the recent Supreme court ruling, serious uncomfortable questions present themselves. A reasonable person might believe trumps threats to seek revenge on his opponents, as well as his offer to trade environmental protections for a billion dollars present a threat to the constitution and the wellbeing of the country. Having sworn to protect and defend the constitution, and in light of the new presidential authority, it is Biden's duty to prevent any chance of trump winning the upcoming presidential election in any way his newfound authority allows. Should Biden, exercise his newfound authority by imprisoning trump in Guantanamo, or some other way? If congress opposes such actions, they can always impeach him if they can get enough of our representatives to find him guilty.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/01/trump-immunity-scotus-decision-full-text-pdf/

Persecuting and imprisoning political opponents is what Republican presidents do – not Democratic presidents.

With Trump in the WH we’ll see unbridled corruption, criminality, and abuse of power.

 

[martybegan]

That's simply not true and you continue to ignore any document facts to the contrary.

Like when he tried to instruct the DoJ to publish a statement saying that the election was corrupt despite there being no factual basis for the statement.

How long are you going to avoid acknowledging this?

So what? I still think the election was corrupt in some places, and I supported him looking into it.

Meanwhile lets see what Dems come up with when Trump wins the EC count in November.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Persecuting and imprisoning political opponents is what Republican presidents do – not Democratic presidents.

With Trump in the WH we’ll see unbridled corruption, criminality, and abuse of power.

Lol just lol, you loons have been doing it to Trump for years

 

[Marener]

Do you know what unviable means? An ectopic pregnancy or a dead or dying fetus is a danger to the mother and it's you that keeps throwing around general terms. So FOAD

.

Unviable means unable to live outside the womb.

 

[Marener]

So what? I still think the election was corrupt in some places, and I supported him looking into it.

Meanwhile let’s see what Dems come up with when Trump wins the EC count in November.

Your argument makes sense only if your ignore facts and reality.

You can’t come to grips with what you support.

 

[OKTexas]

Unviable means unable to live outside the womb.

An unviable pregnancy is the inability to survive, not just outside the womb. I told your commie ass to look it up, since you seem to be incapable of that:


un·vi·a·ble
[ˌənˈvīəb(ə)l]
adjective
unviable (adjective)

1. not capable of working successfully; not feasible:
   "the commission found the plan to be financially unviable"
   
   
   .
   

 

[SavannahMann]

I'm sorry but I don't agree. Killing a political opponent is wrong no matter how many members of SCOTUS claim it can be legal.

We don’t legislate morality. We legislate crimes. Courts don’t examine morality, but criminality.

And morality is always a bit of a conundrum. Let’s say you can go back in time and kill Hitler as a baby. If you do you could prevent World War Two and the deaths of millions of innocents.

Is it moral to kill a dictator who will cause the deaths of millions of innocents? Or is it immoral to kill a baby?

In most elections we are left with the choice of what we call the lesser of two evils. In 2016 I said that Trump was the lesser evil. In 2020 I said that there wasn’t any difference and as such I didn’t vote. We always say that. It’s because we know we are doing the right thing, but the reality is we are left with two bad choices, and we have to choose the least worse one.

In this scenario you know Trump will be a dictator. You won’t be able to stop him once he is in office. He has said he will do it. The supports snort and scoff and say he is trolling the Left with the things.

So is it immoral to murder him? Is it more immoral to let him take the power and do the things he says he will?

 

[SavannahMann]

Clinton lied in a State court proceeding, and perjury is not a presidential duty.

.

It isn’t? So if the President is asked questions about top secret information under oath he must answer those questions?

 

[SavannahMann]

He ordered them to investigate the election. He also didn't try to stay in office, so any actual damages aren't there.

The Deposition was for acts performed before he was in office. try again.

You are fucking insane.

Trump did try and stay in office. You should read what he told the Department heads to do.

 

[SavannahMann]

Your political opponent is not an enemy of the nation.

Try again, mouth breather.

If Trump does what he says then he is an enemy of the nation.

 

[Dragonlady]

So the foreign commie bitch is lying her frozen ass off again. I post links where appropriate, the last one was Saturday, it sent Care4all heading for the hills.

.

You've never sent ANYONE running for the hills, in your entire posting history. And calling me a "lying commie bitch" does not mean I am one. In fact, the only people who consistently claim others are lying, are themselves "liars".

If the only way you can "win" the argument is to lie about other people and call them names, it doesn't say much about your belief system, or your reasons for supporting a white nationalist government.

Your refusal to acknowledge the white nationalism which underpins the Party of Trump, show you to be in complete denial. They say it openly. They're not going to count "urban votes, or let non-whites vote.

The whole point of Civil Rights lawsuits in some States is to setup black majority districts.

And again with the "anyone to the right of Mitt Romney is a racist white nationalist nazi. "

No it is not. The point of Civil Rights lawsuits is to prevent the suppression of minority voters.

You keep posting Russian, Chinese and Iranian propaganda and lies - all of which Republicans are gleefully parroting as their own ideas.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

They didn’t convey Qualified Immunity. They gave absolute immunity.

They absolutely didn't

Let’s explain the difference.

Qualified Immunity means the Cop, or Official, claims to be acting to carry out his duty. That claim is examined, usually by courts. The claim is turned down if the cop violated well established civil rights or the laws.

The immunity is qualified. As long as the cop was doing what policy said and did not violate an established civil right or restriction, the cop is immune from civil or criminal penalty.

This applies mostly the civil litigation. The President had that long before Trump showed up. The question is Criminal Responsibility.

Cops and other officials face criminal penalties all the time for violating laws. So comparing the Qualified Immunity to what is now the law for Presidents is laughable.

The protections now in place for the President are greater than any leader short of Dictator in history. Thou shall not disobey or question the Chief Executive. There are no limits to his power.

Assassinating Trump is the obvious example, and I honestly hope that Biden does so immediately. But remember how awful Biden was for ordering the forgiveness of the Student Loans? That is now perfectly legal. He just has to declare it part of his official duties as President and you can’t hold him accountable.

Heck. Biden can order the election stopped. Nobody can say anything about it. You can’t even impeach Biden now.

Impeachment is for High Crimes and Misdemeanors. But Biden can’t be charged with any crime, as he is immune to prosecution. So you can’t impeach him as he can’t commit any crime. Anything he does is automatically legal so long as it is official business of the Government.

The only way to get the President to once again be held accountable would be to overturn the decision by the Supremes, or pass an Amendment. The only way any demand for an Amendment will be heard is if Biden shows how dangerous this power created out of thin air really is.

So President Biden. You should announce that you have found Trump to be a danger to America and are ordering any and all Federal Employees to assassinate him immediately. Anyone who fails to do so will be charged with dereliction of duty.

This is exactly why homeschooling is surging. You people are an indictment of the public education system.

 

[Dragonlady]

He ordered them to investigate the election. He also didn't try to stay in office, so any actual damages aren't there.

The Deposition was for acts performed before he was in office. try again.

You are fucking insane.

And when they investigated and found nothing, he told them to go back and find SOMETHING, ANYTHING he could use. He told State Governors to just announce there were "issues" and let him do the rest. Let's put it this way - according to the SC, everything Richard Nixon did is legal and he should never have been impeached.

"I just want you to find 11,000 votes". But since federal elections and Electors' Certificates are in no way the function of the federal government or the President, Trump is still criminally liable for the fake electors scheme and his attempts to overthrow the election.

 

[forkup]

Show me one state law that forces a women to carry an unviable fetus to term. An unviable fetus in a danger to the mother.

.

5 women sue Texas over abortion bans, saying their lives were put at risk.

Five women are suing Texas, saying they were denied life-saving care and their health was put at risk, due to the state's strict abortion bans.

abcnews.go.com

This is the tragedy of people like you. You don't let such a thing as not being informed stop you from claiming things with great certainty.

 

[Dragonlady]

It has been almost 50 years since the high court ruled presidents have absolute immunity from civil lawsuits in Nixon v. Fitzgerald.

The court held ex-President Richard Nixon had such immunity for acts taken “within the ‘outer perimeter’ of his official responsibility.”

Yet in 1974’s United States v. Nixon, the court ruled a president is not immune from a criminal subpoena. Nixon was forced to comply with a subpoena for his White House tapes in the Watergate scandal from special counsel Leon Jaworski.

This new decision would have given Nixon immunity for his attempt to use the DOJ to cover up Watergate, and for his firing of the AG in the Saturday Night Massacre. In fact, under this SC ruling, Nixon could not be impeached for obstructing the Watergate Investigation, or any of his actions involving the DOJ, or the Cambodian War.