LMBO!! Sea levels are FALLING!!!

[skookerasbil]

Falling Sea Level

duh

And the climate crusaders wonder why nobody cares about global warming!!! Every time they go off on these hysterical rants, science pokes them right smack dab in the eye!!!


[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/Alaska%20in%20Jan.png.html][/URL]



Who's not winning?!!!

 

[gipper]

The truth means nothing to AGW believers. They believe!!!

 

[Old Rocks]

• Full-text
• PDF

Article Citation:
John D. Boon (2012) Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America. Journal of Coastal Research: Volume 28, Issue 6: pp. 1437 – 1445.
doi: An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie




RESEARCH PAPERS
Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America
John D. Boon
[email protected]





ABSTRACT
Boon, J.D., 2012. Evidence of sea level acceleration at U.S. and Canadian tide stations, Atlantic Coast, North America.

Evidence of statistically significant acceleration in sea level rise relative to land is found in a recent analysis of monthly mean sea level (mmsl) at tide stations on the Atlantic coast of North America. Serial trend analysis was used at 11 U.S. Atlantic coast stations and 1 Canadian station (Halifax, Nova Scotia) with record lengths exceeding 75 years to examine change in the linear trend rate of rise over time. Deriving trend estimates that apply in the median year of fixed-length mmsl series, reversals in rate direction (increasing or decreasing) were observed around 1939–40 and again in the mid-1960s except at the northeasternmost stations in the latter period. What has not been observed until recently is a sharp reversal (in 1987) followed by a uniform, near-linear change in rise rate that infers constant acceleration at eight mid- to NE Atlantic tide stations, change not seen at SE U.S. Atlantic stations. Quadratic regression and analysis of variance applied to mmsl series over the last 43 years (1969–2011) confirms that addition of a quadratic term representing acceleration is statistically significant at 16 tide stations from Virginia to Nova Scotia. Previous quadratic model studies have focused on sea level series of longer spanning periods with variable serial trends undermining quadratic expression of either accelerating or decelerating sea level. Although the present 43-year analysis offers no proof that acceleration will be long lived, the rapidity of the nascent serial trend increase within the region of interest is unusual. Assuming constant acceleration exists and continues, the regression model projects mmsl by 2050 varying between 0.2 and 0.9 m above mean sea level (MSL) in the NE region and between −0.3 and 0.4 m above MSL in the SE region.

Real Climate has about as much credibility as the Weekly Globe. Here is real information from people who do real studies on the subject.

 

[Old Rocks]

Steven Goddard (Tony Heller)
Credentials

• Bachelor of Science.
• Bachelor in Electrical Engineering.

Source: [1]

Background
Steven Goddard is a global warming skeptic and guest author at the climate change skeptic blog WattsUpWithThat (WUWT). The name “Steven Goddard” is a pseudonym used by Tony Heller, according to the Heartland Institute. [2]

Goddard is known for a 2008 article in The Register where he posited that Arctic Sea ice is not receding and claimed that data from the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) showing the opposite was incorrect. Goddard later issued a retraction on his statement. [3], [4]

Goddard operates a blog titled “Real Science” blog, originally Real-Science.com, and now as the Wordpress blog Real Science. Goddard has gone to some lengths to keep his identity hidden and his blog's web domain has been blocked from any identifying WhoIs information.

Stance on Climate Change
“Global temperatures in 2012 are cooler than they were 22 years ago. The only colder period since 1990 was after the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo.

Scientists have been quite lucky about the lack of large volcanic eruptions this century, which has allowed them to continue fooling the particularly weak-minded about global warming.” [5]

Steven Goddard

Heller doesn't even have the courage to publish under his name. And no credentials at all connected to climate research. He is a fake and a fraud.

 

[gipper]

• Full-text
• PDF

Article Citation:
John D. Boon (2012) Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America. Journal of Coastal Research: Volume 28, Issue 6: pp. 1437 – 1445.
doi: An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie




RESEARCH PAPERS
Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America
John D. Boon
[email protected]





ABSTRACT
Boon, J.D., 2012. Evidence of sea level acceleration at U.S. and Canadian tide stations, Atlantic Coast, North America.

Evidence of statistically significant acceleration in sea level rise relative to land is found in a recent analysis of monthly mean sea level (mmsl) at tide stations on the Atlantic coast of North America. Serial trend analysis was used at 11 U.S. Atlantic coast stations and 1 Canadian station (Halifax, Nova Scotia) with record lengths exceeding 75 years to examine change in the linear trend rate of rise over time. Deriving trend estimates that apply in the median year of fixed-length mmsl series, reversals in rate direction (increasing or decreasing) were observed around 1939–40 and again in the mid-1960s except at the northeasternmost stations in the latter period. What has not been observed until recently is a sharp reversal (in 1987) followed by a uniform, near-linear change in rise rate that infers constant acceleration at eight mid- to NE Atlantic tide stations, change not seen at SE U.S. Atlantic stations. Quadratic regression and analysis of variance applied to mmsl series over the last 43 years (1969–2011) confirms that addition of a quadratic term representing acceleration is statistically significant at 16 tide stations from Virginia to Nova Scotia. Previous quadratic model studies have focused on sea level series of longer spanning periods with variable serial trends undermining quadratic expression of either accelerating or decelerating sea level. Although the present 43-year analysis offers no proof that acceleration will be long lived, the rapidity of the nascent serial trend increase within the region of interest is unusual. Assuming constant acceleration exists and continues, the regression model projects mmsl by 2050 varying between 0.2 and 0.9 m above mean sea level (MSL) in the NE region and between −0.3 and 0.4 m above MSL in the SE region.

Real Climate has about as much credibility as the Weekly Globe. Here is real information from people who do real studies on the subject.

Well then, somebody is lying.

Who could it be?

 

[jc456]

• Full-text
• PDF

Article Citation:
John D. Boon (2012) Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America. Journal of Coastal Research: Volume 28, Issue 6: pp. 1437 – 1445.
doi: An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie




RESEARCH PAPERS
Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America
John D. Boon
[email protected]





ABSTRACT
Boon, J.D., 2012. Evidence of sea level acceleration at U.S. and Canadian tide stations, Atlantic Coast, North America.

Evidence of statistically significant acceleration in sea level rise relative to land is found in a recent analysis of monthly mean sea level (mmsl) at tide stations on the Atlantic coast of North America. Serial trend analysis was used at 11 U.S. Atlantic coast stations and 1 Canadian station (Halifax, Nova Scotia) with record lengths exceeding 75 years to examine change in the linear trend rate of rise over time. Deriving trend estimates that apply in the median year of fixed-length mmsl series, reversals in rate direction (increasing or decreasing) were observed around 1939–40 and again in the mid-1960s except at the northeasternmost stations in the latter period. What has not been observed until recently is a sharp reversal (in 1987) followed by a uniform, near-linear change in rise rate that infers constant acceleration at eight mid- to NE Atlantic tide stations, change not seen at SE U.S. Atlantic stations. Quadratic regression and analysis of variance applied to mmsl series over the last 43 years (1969–2011) confirms that addition of a quadratic term representing acceleration is statistically significant at 16 tide stations from Virginia to Nova Scotia. Previous quadratic model studies have focused on sea level series of longer spanning periods with variable serial trends undermining quadratic expression of either accelerating or decelerating sea level. Although the present 43-year analysis offers no proof that acceleration will be long lived, the rapidity of the nascent serial trend increase within the region of interest is unusual. Assuming constant acceleration exists and continues, the regression model projects mmsl by 2050 varying between 0.2 and 0.9 m above mean sea level (MSL) in the NE region and between −0.3 and 0.4 m above MSL in the SE region.

Real Climate has about as much credibility as the Weekly Globe. Here is real information from people who do real studies on the subject.

then why are Hawaii and Key West not suffering?

 

[G.T.]

• Full-text
• PDF

Article Citation:
John D. Boon (2012) Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America. Journal of Coastal Research: Volume 28, Issue 6: pp. 1437 – 1445.
doi: An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie




RESEARCH PAPERS
Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America
John D. Boon
[email protected]





ABSTRACT
Boon, J.D., 2012. Evidence of sea level acceleration at U.S. and Canadian tide stations, Atlantic Coast, North America.

Evidence of statistically significant acceleration in sea level rise relative to land is found in a recent analysis of monthly mean sea level (mmsl) at tide stations on the Atlantic coast of North America. Serial trend analysis was used at 11 U.S. Atlantic coast stations and 1 Canadian station (Halifax, Nova Scotia) with record lengths exceeding 75 years to examine change in the linear trend rate of rise over time. Deriving trend estimates that apply in the median year of fixed-length mmsl series, reversals in rate direction (increasing or decreasing) were observed around 1939–40 and again in the mid-1960s except at the northeasternmost stations in the latter period. What has not been observed until recently is a sharp reversal (in 1987) followed by a uniform, near-linear change in rise rate that infers constant acceleration at eight mid- to NE Atlantic tide stations, change not seen at SE U.S. Atlantic stations. Quadratic regression and analysis of variance applied to mmsl series over the last 43 years (1969–2011) confirms that addition of a quadratic term representing acceleration is statistically significant at 16 tide stations from Virginia to Nova Scotia. Previous quadratic model studies have focused on sea level series of longer spanning periods with variable serial trends undermining quadratic expression of either accelerating or decelerating sea level. Although the present 43-year analysis offers no proof that acceleration will be long lived, the rapidity of the nascent serial trend increase within the region of interest is unusual. Assuming constant acceleration exists and continues, the regression model projects mmsl by 2050 varying between 0.2 and 0.9 m above mean sea level (MSL) in the NE region and between −0.3 and 0.4 m above MSL in the SE region.

Real Climate has about as much credibility as the Weekly Globe. Here is real information from people who do real studies on the subject.

then why aren't Hawaii and Key West not suffering?

arent not is a double negative bro

 

[flacaltenn]

• Full-text
• PDF

Article Citation:
John D. Boon (2012) Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America. Journal of Coastal Research: Volume 28, Issue 6: pp. 1437 – 1445.
doi: An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie




RESEARCH PAPERS
Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America
John D. Boon
[email protected]





ABSTRACT
Boon, J.D., 2012. Evidence of sea level acceleration at U.S. and Canadian tide stations, Atlantic Coast, North America.

Evidence of statistically significant acceleration in sea level rise relative to land is found in a recent analysis of monthly mean sea level (mmsl) at tide stations on the Atlantic coast of North America. Serial trend analysis was used at 11 U.S. Atlantic coast stations and 1 Canadian station (Halifax, Nova Scotia) with record lengths exceeding 75 years to examine change in the linear trend rate of rise over time. Deriving trend estimates that apply in the median year of fixed-length mmsl series, reversals in rate direction (increasing or decreasing) were observed around 1939–40 and again in the mid-1960s except at the northeasternmost stations in the latter period. What has not been observed until recently is a sharp reversal (in 1987) followed by a uniform, near-linear change in rise rate that infers constant acceleration at eight mid- to NE Atlantic tide stations, change not seen at SE U.S. Atlantic stations. Quadratic regression and analysis of variance applied to mmsl series over the last 43 years (1969–2011) confirms that addition of a quadratic term representing acceleration is statistically significant at 16 tide stations from Virginia to Nova Scotia. Previous quadratic model studies have focused on sea level series of longer spanning periods with variable serial trends undermining quadratic expression of either accelerating or decelerating sea level. Although the present 43-year analysis offers no proof that acceleration will be long lived, the rapidity of the nascent serial trend increase within the region of interest is unusual. Assuming constant acceleration exists and continues, the regression model projects mmsl by 2050 varying between 0.2 and 0.9 m above mean sea level (MSL) in the NE region and between −0.3 and 0.4 m above MSL in the SE region.

Real Climate has about as much credibility as the Weekly Globe. Here is real information from people who do real studies on the subject.

Hey Rocks. The way this works is you DON'T pull papers from 2012 to refute newer findings of MSL data.
Just thought you should know..

 

[flacaltenn]

• Full-text
• PDF

Article Citation:
John D. Boon (2012) Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America. Journal of Coastal Research: Volume 28, Issue 6: pp. 1437 – 1445.
doi: An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie




RESEARCH PAPERS
Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America
John D. Boon
[email protected]





ABSTRACT
Boon, J.D., 2012. Evidence of sea level acceleration at U.S. and Canadian tide stations, Atlantic Coast, North America.

Evidence of statistically significant acceleration in sea level rise relative to land is found in a recent analysis of monthly mean sea level (mmsl) at tide stations on the Atlantic coast of North America. Serial trend analysis was used at 11 U.S. Atlantic coast stations and 1 Canadian station (Halifax, Nova Scotia) with record lengths exceeding 75 years to examine change in the linear trend rate of rise over time. Deriving trend estimates that apply in the median year of fixed-length mmsl series, reversals in rate direction (increasing or decreasing) were observed around 1939–40 and again in the mid-1960s except at the northeasternmost stations in the latter period. What has not been observed until recently is a sharp reversal (in 1987) followed by a uniform, near-linear change in rise rate that infers constant acceleration at eight mid- to NE Atlantic tide stations, change not seen at SE U.S. Atlantic stations. Quadratic regression and analysis of variance applied to mmsl series over the last 43 years (1969–2011) confirms that addition of a quadratic term representing acceleration is statistically significant at 16 tide stations from Virginia to Nova Scotia. Previous quadratic model studies have focused on sea level series of longer spanning periods with variable serial trends undermining quadratic expression of either accelerating or decelerating sea level. Although the present 43-year analysis offers no proof that acceleration will be long lived, the rapidity of the nascent serial trend increase within the region of interest is unusual. Assuming constant acceleration exists and continues, the regression model projects mmsl by 2050 varying between 0.2 and 0.9 m above mean sea level (MSL) in the NE region and between −0.3 and 0.4 m above MSL in the SE region.

Real Climate has about as much credibility as the Weekly Globe. Here is real information from people who do real studies on the subject.

then why are Hawaii and Key West not suffering?

Because the ocean levels are NOT FLAT. And they VARY.. You look at a worldwide map of "Sea Level" and you'll see this. They are influenced locally quite a bit by gravity variations and currents and floor topology and TEMPERATURE..

We are spoiled by the term MSL.. It's actually one of the most complex constructs on the planet.. To get it accurate to the millimeter range anyway.. Ask a professional surveyor. They'll tell how complicated it is..

So levels CAN be dropping in some areas and rising in others in DECADES..

But we're finding that those Pac Island issues are more long term topology issues than blatant SL rise. Those islands are "spreading out" and getting lower over time if the geologic activity is dormant..

 

[koshergrl]

*yawn*

 

[flacaltenn]

*yawn*

You aren't amused by the sanity of this compared to the hysterical daily GW propaganda campaign????
The herd has been purposely panicked and you're napping??

 

[jc456]

• Full-text
• PDF

Article Citation:
John D. Boon (2012) Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America. Journal of Coastal Research: Volume 28, Issue 6: pp. 1437 – 1445.
doi: An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie




RESEARCH PAPERS
Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America
John D. Boon
[email protected]





ABSTRACT
Boon, J.D., 2012. Evidence of sea level acceleration at U.S. and Canadian tide stations, Atlantic Coast, North America.

Evidence of statistically significant acceleration in sea level rise relative to land is found in a recent analysis of monthly mean sea level (mmsl) at tide stations on the Atlantic coast of North America. Serial trend analysis was used at 11 U.S. Atlantic coast stations and 1 Canadian station (Halifax, Nova Scotia) with record lengths exceeding 75 years to examine change in the linear trend rate of rise over time. Deriving trend estimates that apply in the median year of fixed-length mmsl series, reversals in rate direction (increasing or decreasing) were observed around 1939–40 and again in the mid-1960s except at the northeasternmost stations in the latter period. What has not been observed until recently is a sharp reversal (in 1987) followed by a uniform, near-linear change in rise rate that infers constant acceleration at eight mid- to NE Atlantic tide stations, change not seen at SE U.S. Atlantic stations. Quadratic regression and analysis of variance applied to mmsl series over the last 43 years (1969–2011) confirms that addition of a quadratic term representing acceleration is statistically significant at 16 tide stations from Virginia to Nova Scotia. Previous quadratic model studies have focused on sea level series of longer spanning periods with variable serial trends undermining quadratic expression of either accelerating or decelerating sea level. Although the present 43-year analysis offers no proof that acceleration will be long lived, the rapidity of the nascent serial trend increase within the region of interest is unusual. Assuming constant acceleration exists and continues, the regression model projects mmsl by 2050 varying between 0.2 and 0.9 m above mean sea level (MSL) in the NE region and between −0.3 and 0.4 m above MSL in the SE region.

Real Climate has about as much credibility as the Weekly Globe. Here is real information from people who do real studies on the subject.

then why are Hawaii and Key West not suffering?

Because the ocean levels are NOT FLAT. And they VARY.. You look at a worldwide map of "Sea Level" and you'll see this. They are influenced locally quite a bit by gravity variations and currents and floor topology and TEMPERATURE..

We are spoiled by the term MSL.. It's actually one of the most complex constructs on the planet.. To get it accurate to the millimeter range anyway.. Ask a professional surveyor. They'll tell how complicated it is..

So levels CAN be dropping in some areas and rising in others in DECADES..

But we're finding that those Pac Island issues are more long term topology issues than blatant SL rise. Those islands are "spreading out" and getting lower over time if the geologic activity is dormant..

especially any island with volcanic activity by it. Again, the warmers in here are ignoring reality and factual geological behavior and whining about something that has nothing to do with what they complain about.

 

[koshergrl]

*yawn*

You aren't amused by the sanity of this compared to the hysterical daily GW propaganda campaign????
The herd has been purposely panicked and you're napping??

Translation...

OMG OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG
THE WEATHER IS NOT STATIC!!!!! THINGS CHANGE!
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG

I reiterate...*yawn*.

 

[skookerasbil]

Look at the heads exploding on this thread.

What a laugh......here we have scientific measurement FACTS attempting to be countered with dinosaur articles from YEARS ago!!!!!!

Losing s0ns......the water levels are falling. Tough shit on you guys!!!


Progressives..........these people define fraud. Its like they come right to your party, shit on the floor and insist there is no smell and ask for a glass of Macallan 18!!

 

[skookerasbil]

PS......in Manhattan, the drop is significant!!! With a capital S s0ns!!!

Oh and also......this was a top story on DRUDGE yesterday........right up there with the news from Belgium.



Whos not winning???

 

[G.T.]

PS......in Manhattan, the drop is significant!!! With a capital S s0ns!!!

Oh and also......this was a top story on DRUDGE yesterday........right up there with the news from Belgium.



Whos not winning???

Someone who reads a site called drudge should prolly be euthanized.

 

[skookerasbil]

PS......in Manhattan, the drop is significant!!! With a capital S s0ns!!!

Oh and also......this was a top story on DRUDGE yesterday........right up there with the news from Belgium.



Whos not winning???

Someone who reads a site called drudge should prolly be euthanized.

Only a billion hits/month s0n!!!

Your place for news..............MSNBC.........has about what? 179 viewers/day!!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Sea levels falling...because global warming!!!

 

[G.T.]

PS......in Manhattan, the drop is significant!!! With a capital S s0ns!!!

Oh and also......this was a top story on DRUDGE yesterday........right up there with the news from Belgium.



Whos not winning???

Someone who reads a site called drudge should prolly be euthanized.

Only a billion hits/month s0n!!!

Your place for news..............MSNBC.........has about what? 179 viewers/day!!

You dont decide my "place for news" you impotent no pussy getting virgin. And no, he doesnt get a billion hits a month. You fail fail fail awwwww

 

[G.T.]

Sea levels falling...because global warming!!!

Frank, the next "level" youll reach and supercede in life will only come once you let go of your global warming OBSESSION. Quote ya daddy. Its ok. I am other ppl's daddies, too.