Liz Cheney Referred For Criminal Prosecution

[struth]

If it didn’t happen he would have said so in his testimony. He didn’t

He said he didn’t remember. Why? Because someone may have heard and that would subject him to perjury charges

He didn't say he didn't remember. You all keep lying.

In Ornato’s November 29, 2022, transcribed interview, he directly refuted Hutchinson’s testimony that she allegedly heard the story about what happened in the Beast. Ornato testified that the first time he had ever heard the story Hutchinson claims Ornato told her on January 6, was during Hutchinson’s public testimony.196 https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/...73D3298D955C8E19F.initial-findings-report.pdf
"I recall that day after Ms. Hutchinson's testimony. going to the Secret Service Counsel and being in his office and then the Secret Service spokesperson what my recollection was of that story. And I relayed that that that was not a story I recollect and I don't recall that story HAPPENING and the FIRST TIME hearing it was when she had said it."
Hutchinson’s testimony was also contradicted by the USSS agent who was with President Trump on January 6. On November 7, 2022, the Select Committee conducted a transcribed interview with the USSS agent who drove President Trump and Engel to and from the Ellipse on January 6, 2021. In this interview, the Select Committee did not ask the driver specifically about Hutchinson’s testimony. Hutchinson’s accusation came up only after the Secret Service agent’s attorney proactively brought up the subject. The driver testified that he specifically refuted the version of events as recounted by Hutchinson. The driver of the SUV testified that he “did not see him reach [redacted]. [President Trump] never grabbed the steering wheel. I didn’t see him, you know, lunge to try to get into the front seat at all.”197 Despite the driver of the President’s SUV testifying under oath that the Hutchinson story was false, the Select Committee chose to validate and promote Hutchinson’s version of the story as fact. The Select Committee hid the driver’s full testimony and only favorably mentioned his testimony in its Final Report, it did not release the full transcript.


This was all a hoax, a lie and a hoax created by the Jan 6th Committee, now Liz is looking at twenty years for witness tampering. The chickens have come home to roost

 

[DonGlock26]

Has there ever been a witness that testified that a prosecutor called to the stand, that was not spoken to first? Or a defense witness called to the stand, without the defense attorney knowing what they were going to say....without talking to them first?

Has there ever been a public congressional hearing, where a congressman called a witness, and the congressman did not already know what his witness would testify to, because he or staff interviewed him first?

This is NORMAL every day practice...not criminal!

Did you read the texts? They knew they were doing things they shouldn't be doing. Don't worry, the GJ will get to the bottom of it.

 

[DonGlock26]

None of which provide proof, just conspiracy theories. I prefer facts.

You can read the GJ's report, if one is seated.

 

[Jroc]

So no actual evidence of tampering with her testimon

her testimony is after the fact genius you dont send texts to witnesses plus she knowingly lied and destroyed evidence Benny Thompson should be charged with her which is why he's trying to get a pardon from Biden

 

[DonGlock26]

 

[DonGlock26]

Liz Cheney Goes Nuclear Over GOP Demand She Face Criminal Probe
A report released Tuesday by GOP leaders issued a harsh rebuke of the “failures and politicization” of the now-disbanded House Jan. 6 Committee and recommended a criminal investigation into former Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, one of the panel’s leading voices.

“Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi’s multimillion-dollar Select Committee was a political weapon with a singular focus to deceive the public into blaming President Trump for the violence on January 6 and to tarnish the legacy of his first Presidency,” Republicans in the 128-page report declared.

In addition to the recommendation that the FBI open an investigation into Cheney’s actions, the report also accused her of witness tampering for being in touch with former White House aide and committee witness Cassidy Hutchinson.

Liz Cheney Goes Nuclear Over GOP Demand She Face Criminal Probe

A report released Tuesday by GOP leaders issued a harsh rebuke of the “failures and politicization” of the now-disbanded House Jan. 6 Committee and recommended a criminal investigation into former Wyo...

www.yahoo.com

Liz, you can tell the grand jury all about it, after you are sworn in.

 

[Shareprofit]

Criminal witness tampering? That doesnt sound good.

Except it didn't happen, talking to a witness is not witness tampering. You MAGA are so full of shit.

 

[TNHarley]

Except it didn't happen, talking to a witness is not witness tampering. You MAGA are so full of shit.

Lol and im supposed to listen to some random, binary dipshit on the internet?

 

[0311]

You can start with this. The report, which you claim to have read, has hyperlinks.

Cassidy Hutchinson's first attorney was NOT acting in her best interest. He was pushing to lie and when she was advised to seek new counsel she dropped him. Again all you have conjecture, contention, inuendo and hearsay. You have no facts, just MAGA MAGGOT conspiracy theories.

 

[Jroc]

Cassidy Hutchinson's first attorney was NOT acting in her best interest. He was pushing to lie and when she was advised to seek new counsel she dropped him. Again all you have conjecture, contention, inuendo and hearsay. You have no facts, just MAGA MAGGOT conspiracy theories.

Pushing a lie?

 

[0311]

The problem with pushing an edited for content clip is that the original tape should be available for the purposes of comparison. You're pushing a lie. You know you are pushing a lie and do not care you are pushing lie.

I watched Ms. Hutchinson testify and she gave one best full and complete statements given in Jan. 6 Investigations. Her first attorney was more interested in protect 47 than working in the best interest of Ms. Hutchinson. She dropped him and found other counsel. Your lies won't fly so don't even try.

 

[Stann]

Her severe TDS broke her , she cought go to prison.

The House Administration Oversight Subcommittee, led by Chairman Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.), released an interim report on Tuesday regarding the January 6 Capitol riot. The report concluded that the attack was preventable and also called for an investigation into former Rep. Liz Cheney over allegations of criminal witness tampering during the Democrat-led congressional inquiry into the event.


Based on the evidence obtained by this Subcommittee, numerous federal laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney, the former Vice Chair of the January 6 Select Committee, and these violations should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” the report states.

FBI to Investigate Liz Cheney Over J6 Witness Tampering?

The House Administration Oversight Subcommittee, led by Chairman Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.), released

pjmedia.com

LOL , being prosecuted for going after a criminal like trump is a badge of honor. Especially in these times when we have so many confused people idolizing him.

 

[Stann]

~~~~~~~
Will Joey B. issue Lizzie a RINO a get out of jail free card?

I believe she already refused the offer. Although accepting such an offer is reasonable considering Trump's unwarranted desire for vengeance , it could indicate possible guilt. Cheney has none in this manner. None that is legitimate at least.

 

[WEATHER53]

He didn't say he didn't remember. You all keep lying.

In Ornato’s November 29, 2022, transcribed interview, he directly refuted Hutchinson’s testimony that she allegedly heard the story about what happened in the Beast. Ornato testified that the first time he had ever heard the story Hutchinson claims Ornato told her on January 6, was during Hutchinson’s public testimony.196 https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/...73D3298D955C8E19F.initial-findings-report.pdf
"I recall that day after Ms. Hutchinson's testimony. going to the Secret Service Counsel and being in his office and then the Secret Service spokesperson what my recollection was of that story. And I relayed that that that was not a story I recollect and I don't recall that story HAPPENING and the FIRST TIME hearing it was when she had said it."
Hutchinson’s testimony was also contradicted by the USSS agent who was with President Trump on January 6. On November 7, 2022, the Select Committee conducted a transcribed interview with the USSS agent who drove President Trump and Engel to and from the Ellipse on January 6, 2021. In this interview, the Select Committee did not ask the driver specifically about Hutchinson’s testimony. Hutchinson’s accusation came up only after the Secret Service agent’s attorney proactively brought up the subject. The driver testified that he specifically refuted the version of events as recounted by Hutchinson. The driver of the SUV testified that he “did not see him reach [redacted]. [President Trump] never grabbed the steering wheel. I didn’t see him, you know, lunge to try to get into the front seat at all.”197 Despite the driver of the President’s SUV testifying under oath that the Hutchinson story was false, the Select Committee chose to validate and promote Hutchinson’s version of the story as fact. The Select Committee hid the driver’s full testimony and only favorably mentioned his testimony in its Final Report, it did not release the full transcript.


This was all a hoax, a lie and a hoax created by the Jan 6th Committee, now Liz is looking at twenty years for witness tampering. The chickens have come home to roost

More proof that she just made it up and was never told anything. Even IF someone did put that in her ear it’s her responsibility (gasp!!) to confirm it’s validity before going on a harm Trump gossip rampage
Now we have confirmed that it was a lie built on a lie that someone else told her.
Democrat ships are sinking in every port and voyage

 

[WEATHER53]

Cassidy Hutchinson's first attorney was NOT acting in her best interest. He was pushing to lie and when she was advised to seek new counsel she dropped him. Again all you have conjecture, contention, inuendo and hearsay. You have no facts, just MAGA MAGGOT conspiracy theories.

This is as weak bullshit as it gets
She told a lie
She next lied about how and why she came to possess the untruthful info
Now your ass wiping feeble shit comes up with her first attorney was no good and that’s why she became involved with this harmful ruse.
You all need to spend far more time with your coloring books and less time pretending to be engaged in political conversation

 

[Lesh]

More proof that she just made it up and was never told anything. Even IF someone did put that in her ear it’s her responsibility (gasp!!) to confirm it’s validity before going on a harm Trump gossip rampage
Now we have confirmed that it was a lie built on a lie that someone else told her.
Democrat ships are sinking in every port and voyage

There is zero proof that she “made it up”.

And relating a story told to her is not telling a lie. It’s relating a story. That’s it. It’s not up to her to confirm that story.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Hutchinson said that it was Ornato who told her. Ornato said he doesn’t remember, but there’s plenty of reason to doubt his testimony since it was inconsistent with numerous other people.

In testimony to Jan. 6 committee, former White House deputy chief of staff Anthony Ornato said he didn't recall heated motorcade interaction with Trump

"I don't recall any conversation taking place about the possible movement of the president to the Capitol," Anthony Ornato testified.

www.cbsnews.com

Ornato was quick to deny it, in public, where there are no consequences for lying.

He suddenly had memory problems under oath, though...bwahahaha

 

[struth]

There is zero proof that she “made it up”.

And relating a story told to her is not telling a lie. It’s relating a story. That’s it. It’s not up to her to confirm that story.

you mean, besides all the testimony from everyone else saying it didn't happen? So why is everyone, but the witness that Liz used corrupt back channels to tamper with, lying?

 

[struth]

Ornato was quick to deny it, in public, where there are no consequences for lying.

He suddenly had memory problems under oath, though...bwahahaha

"I recall that day after Ms. Hutchinson's testimony. going to the Secret Service Counsel and being in his office and then the Secret Service spokesperson what my recollection was of that story. And I relayed that that that was not a story I recollect and I don't recall that story HAPPENING and the FIRST TIME hearing it was when she had said it."

Really? That was his testimony under oath....saying the first time he heard it was when she said it. What memory problems does he have?

 

[Lesh]

you mean, besides all the testimony from everyone else saying it didn't happen? So why is everyone, but the witness that Liz used corrupt back channels to tamper with, lying?

Who else said the CONVERSATION didn’t happen? Who even said that under oath?