Godboy
Diamond Member
- Dec 29, 2008
- 40,236
- 23,231
- 2,605
Whats this "probably" shit? Do you have evidence of it?It probably wasn’t the first time that she used illegal means to force her religion to deny people their rights.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whats this "probably" shit? Do you have evidence of it?It probably wasn’t the first time that she used illegal means to force her religion to deny people their rights.
If Congress came up with nothing, they wouldn't be referring anyone to the DOJ for criminal investigationCongress had an investigation and came up with nothing.
The DoJ does not start investigations without a reasonable basis.
Congress had an investigation and came up with nothing.
The DoJ does not start investigations without a reasonable basis.
I asked repeatedly and you couldn't provide it.and it's repeatedly been provided. You, like Liz, just didn't like the evidence, and therefore are pushing a false narrative.
In dealing with the grand jury, the prosecutor must always conduct himself or herself as an officer of the court whose function is to ensure that justice is done and that guilt shall not escape nor innocence suffer. The prosecutor must recognize that the grand jury is an independent body, whose functions include not only the investigation of crime and the initiation of criminal prosecution but also the protection of the citizenry from unfounded criminal charges. The prosecutor's responsibility is to advise the grand jury on the law and to present evidence for its consideration. In discharging these responsibilities, the prosecutor must be scrupulously fair to all witnesses and must do nothing to inflame or otherwise improperly influence the grand jurors.Post 441
Sure they would. These Republicans are unethical liars.If Congress came up with nothing, they wouldn't be referring anyone to the DOJ for criminal investigation
They did, but it contains no evidence of a crime.I thought they released a criminal referral for Liz?
Hutchinson lied about the steering wheel mania and Liz pushed that narrative incredibly hardI asked repeatedly and you couldn't provide it.
Where is the evidence Cheney asked Hutchinson to lie?
Who?How about the old woman who was indicted and convicted to 2 years in prison for praying outside of an abortion clinic? Thats just one off the top of my head.![]()
There's no proof she lied and there's no evidence that Cheney asked her to lie.Hutchinson lied about the steering wheel mania and Liz pushed that narrative incredibly hard
No, she truthfully testified to what she was told.Hutchinson lied about the steering wheel mania and Liz pushed that narrative incredibly hard
The lie proof is no one else in the vehicle agreed with her, in fact they refuted herThere's no proof she lied and there's no evidence that Cheney asked her to lie.
Kind of a problem for your phony narrative.
I asked repeatedly and you couldn't provide it.
Where is the evidence Cheney asked Hutchinson to lie?
Hutchinson never said she was in the vehicle, genius.The lie proof is no one else in the vehicle agreed with her, in fact they refuted her
Keep trying for lying
Her recounting of Trump grabbing the wheel was refuted by everyone else in the car. Cheney proceeded as if factNo, she truthfully testified to what she was told.
She stated that during her testimony. The fact that other sycophants have stayed loyal to a grifter isn’t her issue.
Well Liz isn't a republican anymore....so....you are wrong once againSure they would. These Republicans are unethical liars.
Unless you have evidence of Cheney asking her to lie, there's nothing illegal about Cheney communicating with Hutchinson to get her full testimony.
when she first used backchannels to reach here, then directly reached her, to get her to change her testimony, then when she took the stand had her lie.