Liz Cheney Referred For Criminal Prosecution

[otto105]

because when Liz did so corruptly -
otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

www.law.cornell.edu

How was she trying impede, obstruct or influence the official proceeding.

Has any witness stated that she did that to any of their testimony or the official proceeding?

 

[otto105]

and it's repeatedly been provided. You, like Liz, just didn't like the evidence, and therefore are pushing a false narrative.

Provided? How? When?

By whom?

 

[otto105]

How about the old woman who was indicted and convicted to 2 years in prison for praying outside of an abortion clinic? Thats just one off the top of my head.

Sure, post the specifics on the case. Then we all can judge whether you’re lying about that too.

 

[struth]

How was she trying impede, obstruct or influence the official proceeding.

Has any witness stated that she did that to any of their testimony or the official proceeding?

By backchannelling with a witness to change her testimony and commit perjury. It's all outlined in the results of the Congressional investigation that was referred to the DOJ

 

[Godboy]

Sure, post the specifics on the case. Then we all can judge whether you’re lying about that too.

They charged her with conspiracy to block access to a healthcare facility, as if people couldnt just simply walk around her. It was a lone old woman who was just praying.

 

[otto105]

But you won’t jesusboi so I will post the facts of that 75-year-old convict.


https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/...11/#:~:text=Misleading.,in front of a clinic.

 

[otto105]

They charged her with conspiracy to block access to a healthcare facility, as if people couldnt just simply walk around her. It was a lone old woman who was simply praying.

Nope, not even close.

 

[struth]

Provided? How? When?

By whom?

The United States Congress, if you click the link in the OP, the story provides the intel.

but here's a direct link to the conclusion of the investigation: https://justthenews.com/sites/defau...mpiled_Working_Doc__final_locked_version_.pdf

“Based on the evidence obtained by this Subcommittee, numerous federal laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney, the former Vice Chair of the January 6 Select Committee, and these violations should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” the report released by the House Administration Oversight Subcommittee and its chairman Barry Loudermilk stated.

"Evidence uncovered by the Subcommittee revealed that former Congresswoman Liz Cheney tampered with at least one witness, Cassidy Hutchinson, by secretly communicating with Hutchinson without Hutchinson’s attorney’s knowledge.," it added. “This secret communication with a witness is improper and likely violates 18 U.S.C. 1512. Such action is outside the due functioning of the legislative process and therefore not protected by the Speech and Debate clause."


“The Federal Bureau of Investigation must also investigate Representative Cheney for violating 18 U.S.C. 1622, which prohibits any person from procuring another person to commit perjury,” the report said. ”Based on the evidence obtained by this Subcommittee, Hutchinson committed perjury when she lied under oath to the Select Committee.”

 

[otto105]

By backchannelling with a witness to change her testimony and commit perjury. It's all outlined in the results of the Congressional investigation that was referred to the DOJ

Hilarious

You mean the partisan hack job report cited by the OP with no actual evidence.

 

[struth]

Hilarious

You mean the partisan hack job report cited by the OP with no actual evidence.

you can ignore the text messages and testimony all you want....won't change the fact the evidence exist.

 

[Godboy]

But you won’t jesusboi so I will post the facts of that 75-year-old convict.


https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/paulette-harlow-convicted-blocking-abortion-clinic-not-praying-2024-06-11/#:~:text=Misleading.,in front of a clinic.

Fair enough. She did more than i had read. That seems like a situation where you fine the person, or maybe even give them community service. Two fucking years in prison? Nah, thats insane. Thats politically motivated and flat out wrong.

 

[otto105]

The United States Congress, if you click the link in the OP, the story provides the intel.

but here's a direct link to the conclusion of the investigation: https://justthenews.com/sites/defau...mpiled_Working_Doc__final_locked_version_.pdf

“Based on the evidence obtained by this Subcommittee, numerous federal laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney, the former Vice Chair of the January 6 Select Committee, and these violations should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” the report released by the House Administration Oversight Subcommittee and its chairman Barry Loudermilk stated.

"Evidence uncovered by the Subcommittee revealed that former Congresswoman Liz Cheney tampered with at least one witness, Cassidy Hutchinson, by secretly communicating with Hutchinson without Hutchinson’s attorney’s knowledge.," it added. “This secret communication with a witness is improper and likely violates 18 U.S.C. 1512. Such action is outside the due functioning of the legislative process and therefore not protected by the Speech and Debate clause."


“The Federal Bureau of Investigation must also investigate Representative Cheney for violating 18 U.S.C. 1622, which prohibits any person from procuring another person to commit perjury,” the report said. ”Based on the evidence obtained by this Subcommittee, Hutchinson committed perjury when she lied under oath to the Select Committee.”

Yes, a republican hack job searching for any reason to sycophant to a orange makeup fat guy.

Does the report cite any actual evidence?

 

[otto105]

you can ignore the text messages and testimony all you want....won't change the fact the evidence exist.

Cassidy was a Democratic witness.

You just on another phishing trip to dumb.

 

[DonGlock26]

Yes fuckup, the prosecutor uses the police/FBI to investigate and gather evidence. Then, the prosecutor brings that evidence to the grand jury to help decide whether to bring charges. The grand jury doesn’t do the investigative work.

Why is that hard to understand?

Post 441

 

[struth]

Yes, a republican hack job searching for any reason to sycophant to a orange makeup fat guy.

Does the report cite any actual evidence?

actually the subcommittee was made up of a bipartisan group....try again.

 

[otto105]

Fair enough. She did more than i had read. That seems like a situation where you fine the person, or maybe even give them community service. Two fucking years in prison? Nah, thats insane. Thats politically motivated and flat out wrong.

It probably wasn’t the first time that she used illegal means to force her religion to deny people their rights.

 

[DonGlock26]

There’s no evidence of a crime, so there will be no investigation.

That's what investigations are for.

 

[Godboy]

Cassidy was a Democratic witness.

You just on another phishing trip to dumb.

This "fishing trip" will cost her a shitload of money, and she will be forced into depositions and court apoearances. Its going to really suck. It will be even worse if she is convicted.

 

[Marener]

That's what investigations are for.

Congress had an investigation and came up with nothing.

The DoJ does not start investigations without a reasonable basis.

 

[struth]

Cassidy was a Democratic witness.

You just on another phishing trip to dumb.

huh? what does that have to do with anything? That doesn't give the right to Liz to tamper with her testimony and have her commit perjury.