Liz Cheney Referred For Criminal Prosecution

[DonGlock26]

They did, but it contains no evidence of a crime.

According to who? You? MSNBC crackheads?

 

[DonGlock26]

In dealing with the grand jury, the prosecutor must always conduct himself or herself as an officer of the court whose function is to ensure that justice is done and that guilt shall not escape nor innocence suffer. The prosecutor must recognize that the grand jury is an independent body, whose functions include not only the investigation of crime and the initiation of criminal prosecution but also the protection of the citizenry from unfounded criminal charges. The prosecutor's responsibility is to advise the grand jury on the law and to present evidence for its consideration. In discharging these responsibilities, the prosecutor must be scrupulously fair to all witnesses and must do nothing to inflame or otherwise improperly influence the grand jurors.

Behold "investigation" right there in red.

 

[struth]

Ornato said she lied, but it's his word against his and Ornato does not seem like a very reliable witness as he had significant gaps in his memory, which is what Trump-world lawyers were telling the witnesses to do.

Nothing corrupt about communicating with a witness.

No, actually more then just Ornato, it was also Engel. They had no gaps in their memory, and testified that didn't happen. They even offered to come back, after she testified....Liz of course didn't want their testimony heard again.

Secret Service denial of Hutchinson story fuels attacks from both sides

The Secret Service is doubling down on its denial of an alleged altercation between former President Trump and his security detail on Jan. 6 of last year, providing a rare defense of Trump’s …

thehill.com

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2024-12/Final_Report_Compiled_Working_Doc__final_locked_version_.pdf

She also lied about writing a note

Expert Analysis Reveals Hutchinson Not the Author of January 6 Tweet

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration

cha.house.gov

Trump's driver contradicts Cassidy Hutchinson about Jan. 6 SUV altercation, GOP report says

Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony about Trump's actions on Jan. 6 was contradicted, in part, by Trump's driver, a new report from a Republican-led House committee claims

abcnews.go.com

"None of the White House employees corroborated Hutchinson's sensational story about President Trump lunging for the steering wheel

 

[Marener]

I was working shit for brains….

Anyway, in this post of yours, Liz Cheney Referred For Criminal Prosecution

You seem to think that nothing will be done about witness tampering….why?

Nothing will be done because there's no evidence of witness tampering.

 

[Marener]

According to who? You? MSNBC crackheads?

I read the report.

 

[Dragonlady]

you mean, other then all the witnesses that testified that she was lying? hahaha

Liz, throught corrupt backchannelling got her to change her testimony, and include those lies, lies Liz knew were lies, because she had the testimony of the people who were actually there.

NONE of the witnesses called Hutchison a liar or said it didn’t happen when giving sworn testimony. One SS guy in the car said “he didn’t see it happen” what he didn’t say was “it never happened”. He could have been looking outside the car and missed it, but saying he didn’t “see it happen” as opposed to “it never happened” is proof positive that he knew it happened, he just didn’t see it.

 

[struth]

Also, using the Heil Shitler! appointed lawyer for the do-called evidence is hilarious.

She dropped his ass because he wanted her to be loyal to a grifter ass and lie.

That was a lie too....as the evidence shows: https://justthenews.com/sites/defau...mpiled_Working_Doc__final_locked_version_.pdf

Contrary to the Select Committee’s and Hutchinson’s narrative, however, the Subcommittee obtained messages between Alyssa Farah Griffin and Hutchinson where Hutchinson admits that Passantino was acting in her best interest and that she agreed with his counsel.172

 

[otto105]

Ornato said she lied, but it's his word against his and Ornato does not seem like a very reliable witness as he had significant gaps in his memory, which is what Trump-world lawyers were telling the witnesses to do.

Nothing corrupt about communicating with a witness.

Everything he said in his testimony was I don’t recall or remember.

Butt kisser

 

[DonGlock26]

I read the report.

So you.

 

[struth]

NONE of the witnesses called Hutchison a liar or said it didn’t happen when giving sworn testimony. One SS guy in the car said “he didn’t see it happen” what he didn’t say was “it never happened”. He could have been looking outside the car and missed it, but saying he didn’t “see it happen” as opposed to “it never happened” is proof positive that he knew it happened, he just didn’t see it.

yes, yes they did. i provided links to show that

Secret Service denial of Hutchinson story fuels attacks from both sides

The Secret Service is doubling down on its denial of an alleged altercation between former President Trump and his security detail on Jan. 6 of last year, providing a rare defense of Trump’s …

thehill.com

Both Ornato and Engel, who remain active Secret Service agents, have said they are willing to testify under oath to dispute Hutchinson’s narrative, even as they have refused to speak publicly about it. The unnamed driver, the agency has signaled, is also denying her account.

 

[j-mac]

Nothing will be done because there's no evidence of witness tampering.

Did the committee just make it up?

 

[Marener]

Did the committee just make it up?

The accusation? Yes. There's no evidence to substantiate it.

It's all narrative for the low information MAGAs.

 

[struth]

Everything he said in his testimony was I don’t recall or remember.

Butt kisser

Secret Service denial of Hutchinson story fuels attacks from both sides

The Secret Service is doubling down on its denial of an alleged altercation between former President Trump and his security detail on Jan. 6 of last year, providing a rare defense of Trump’s …

thehill.com

Both Ornato and Engel, who remain active Secret Service agents, have said they are willing to testify under oath to dispute Hutchinson’s narrative, even as they have refused to speak publicly about it. The unnamed driver, the agency has signaled, is also denying her account.


Frankly, if you don't recall that is the correct thing to say....committing perjury and tampering with witness to have them committ perjury are both crimes and why Liz is in hot water and looking at 20 years.

 

[otto105]

That was a lie too....as the evidence shows: https://justthenews.com/sites/defau...mpiled_Working_Doc__final_locked_version_.pdf

Contrary to the Select Committee’s and Hutchinson’s narrative, however, the Subcommittee obtained messages between Alyssa Farah Griffin and Hutchinson where Hutchinson admits that Passantino was acting in her best interest and that she agreed with his counsel.172

You should read loudermilk’s report before post that shit. Even his report cites that sycophant lawyer given to her by Heil Shitler! Consulted her to omit the story she was told.

 

[WEATHER53]

She repeated a lie foolishly and brazenly and then Cheney ran with it as truth for some more Trump prosecution persecution

 

[struth]

The accusation? Yes. There's no evidence to substantiate it.

It's all narrative for the low information MAGAs.

you mean, besides all the testimony, and text messages? Showing the corrupt backchannelling and perjury?

Besides all that?

 

[otto105]

Secret Service denial of Hutchinson story fuels attacks from both sides

The Secret Service is doubling down on its denial of an alleged altercation between former President Trump and his security detail on Jan. 6 of last year, providing a rare defense of Trump’s …

thehill.com

Both Ornato and Engel, who remain active Secret Service agents, have said they are willing to testify under oath to dispute Hutchinson’s narrative, even as they have refused to speak publicly about it. The unnamed driver, the agency has signaled, is also denying her account.


Frankly, if you don't recall that is the correct thing to say....committing perjury and tampering with witness to have them committ perjury are both crimes and why Liz is in hot water and looking at 20 years.

I notice that they didn’t testify under oath, so there’s that.

 

[struth]

You should read loudermilk’s report before post that shit. Even his report cites that sycophant lawyer given to her by Heil Shitler! Consulted her to omit the story she was told.

I literally copied it from his report....that is in his report.

 

[struth]

I notice that they didn’t testify under oath, so there’s that.

they did, they were willing to come back AFTER Liz's tampered with witness...to correct the record....Liz wouldn't allow them to.

 

[otto105]

She repeated a lie foolishly and brazenly and then Cheney ran with it as truth for some more Trump prosecution persecution

She told her story as she was told.

Good luck with trying to make her a sycophant again.