Like the man said, no matter how many lib insurrectionists ICE is forced to shoot, it wont be enough

Arrested and released the same day

The pansy cops were paper tigers
LOL.
Those are your wannabe Rambo's.
8 of those morons to wrestle ONE person to the ground?
ONE mall cop could do what it took the 8 Rambo wannabe's to do.
 
LOL.
Those are your wannabe Rambo's.
8 of those morons to wrestle ONE person to the ground?
ONE mall cop could do what it took the 8 Rambo wannabe's to do.
Your side is responsible for all the violence in the streets by refusing to turn over criminal illegal aliens directly from the jails to ICE
 
He might have a bomb, so it’s fine to shoot him?

wtf?
Yep. He had a gun. He pulled that gun out. It is already an armed attack. In a case of armed attack (especially that suicidal) cops can't be sure that he has nothing more, and that there are no other attackers. So, they have right to shoot, as far as I understand their regulations.
 
Yep. He had a gun. He pulled that gun out. It is already an armed attack. In a case of armed attack (especially that suicidal) cops can't be sure that he has nothing more, and that there are no other attackers. So, they have right to shoot, as far as I understand their regulations.

Pretti pulled the gun out?
 
Pretti pulled the gun out?
It doesn't seem impossible so far. And it depends on specific regulations what do you count as "armed attack". Say, according Russian regulations it is "armed attack" even when attacker has his firearm in a holster and attack a cop with his bare hands, or even just refuse to give his weapons to cops.
 
ICE is a law enforcement agency, isn't it? And obstructing the work of law enforcement agencies may be a form of complicity in a crime, as far as I understand. If so, we have organised criminal group, armed with firearms and attacking policemen. Right?
In what way was he obstructing their work? And even if he was obstructing their work that doesn’t justify pepper spraying him and beating him. It certainly doesn’t justify killing him
 
Apart of all other questions, the cops couldn't be sure that he has no explosive device on him, nor that there are no other criminals around them, preparing another attack.


It is quite understandable in those circumstances. That's why I don't like idea of allowing civilians posses small conceivable firearms. It too often force cops to shoot first.
Wow man. You are trying wasaaaay to hard to justify murder. Step back and take a breath. We don’t kill people because they may have a bomb with no evidence of a bomb threat. That’s the dumbest excuse I’ve heard yet
 
Wow man. You are trying wasaaaay to hard to justify murder. Step back and take a breath. We don’t kill people because they may have a bomb with no evidence of a bomb threat. That’s the dumbest excuse I’ve heard yet
You kill guys who have a toy gun and don't put it on the ground after cop's demand.
 
We don’t kill people because they may have a bomb with no evidence of a bomb threat. That’s the dumbest excuse I’ve heard yet
ailzga.jpg



"WE" don't. The government routinely does though.
 
ailzga.jpg



"WE" don't. The government routinely does though.
Apparently so…. I was speaking to principles. I would hope what I said was something that everybody could agree with. It wasn’t a political statement
 
15th post
I think we ALL know what pretty pretti was. Despite how he managed to get himself killed, and with sufficient deference and appropriate condolences to his family and friends, I think it is beyond question that the sustainability of our republic is better off within him in our presence.
 
It doesn't seem impossible so far. And it depends on specific regulations what do you count as "armed attack". Say, according Russian regulations it is "armed attack" even when attacker has his firearm in a holster and attack a cop with his bare hands, or even just refuse to give his weapons to cops.

What kind of word salad nonsense is that?

You said he pulled his gun out. He didn’t.
 
I think we ALL know what pretty pretti was. Despite how he managed to get himself killed, and with sufficient deference and appropriate condolences to his family and friends, I think it is beyond question that the sustainability of our republic is better off within him in our presence.
If the state can kill anyone it wants b/c it claims the person holds views opposed to it, America is done.
 
Back
Top Bottom