Like the man said, no matter how many lib insurrectionists ICE is forced to shoot, it wont be enough

[XponentialChaos]

How did they know he was disarmed? Did they do a pat down? If they did i didn't see it.

They didn’t know. They should have determined if he’s actually a threat before murdering him.

The trigger-happy morons shot first and asked questions later.

 

[toobfreak]

Its either shoot them or expand the loony bins to accommodate and treat their mental illness And the left refuses to do either one

The only treatment for this wave of human refuse is to plug 'em and plant 'em.

When your computer develops a cracked motherboard, you throw it away, you don't try to fix it.

 

[Eman623]

They didn’t know. They should have determined if he’s actually a threat before murdering him.

The trigger-happy morons shot first and asked questions later.

Because his gun went off.

HIS gun

 

[Lesh]

I think his gun shot first.

The gun that was taken from him?

 

[XponentialChaos]

Because his gun went off.

HIS gun

Even if that’s true, does that make it acceptable for them to murder Pretti???

A gun goes off and that’s all the excuse they need to murder the nearest unarmed person they have detained???

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It won't be enough, because the knuckle dragging, hardcore MAGAts are the minority. In the end, they can't win, without cheating or brutalizing people. It's just math.

 

[Mac-7]

From the thread title it sounds like you support murder

You lie when you call it murder

 

[Mac-7]

Did Rittenhouse also go there with the intention to shoot people?

Try being consistent.

Thats a deflection

If I recall you attack Rittenhouse bringing a weapon to the riots

But when ANTIFA/Black Lies Matter threatened him he defended himself and turned out to be a better shot than the wacko libs

Who was Petti planning to shoot?

The only answer was ICE and other federal agents

 

[M14 Shooter]

Stop babbling ya fool

Look at you, yet again proving me correct.
*****.

 

[M14 Shooter]

So wait

You said NO guns and now we see you admit to at least one.

He said no guns were brought into the Capitol
Why did you leave that part out?
Oh - because you're lying *****.

 

[22lcidw]

It won't be enough, because the knuckle dragging, hardcore MAGAts are the minority. In the end, they can't win, without cheating or brutalizing people. It's just math.

I expect as the nation gets poorer the social programs will send out less in checks and benefits. That is the real math. It does not occur to you that there are limits on where the money comes from.

 

[Lesh]

He said no guns were brought into the Capitol
Why did you leave that part out?
Oh - because you're lying *****.

A., Only that idiot was talking about Jan 6.
Tha was not the only right wing riot
B. As noted there were guns THERE. AT THE PROTEST… which was the subject
C. I illustrated numerous right wing Trumper protests where guns were present. Again… the topic

D. **** off troll

 

[TimFitz]

Its either shoot them or expand the loony bins to accommodate and treat their mental illness

And the left refuses to do either one

Lookie! A facist who needs memes to fill his head!

 

[TimFitz]

He had 2 extra magazines and 45 rounds of ammo

Thats a full load for any peace-loving trump hater

I do not believe that. ICE and the Trump regime lie consistantly.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

 

[M14 Shooter]

A., Only that idiot was talking about Jan 6.
Tha was not the only right wing riot
B. As noted there were guns THERE. AT THE PROTEST… which was the subject

You're lying. Again.
He very clearly stated "Into the Capitol building"
The answer is: Zero.

You lied. All you do is lie.

D. **** off troll

Awww.. What the matter boo-boo kitty -- does your ***** hurt?
Lying *****.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Thats a deflection

If I recall you attack Rittenhouse bringing a weapon to the riots

But when ANTIFA/Black Lies Matter threatened him he defended himself and turned out to be a better shot than the wacko libs

Who was Petti planning to shoot?

The only answer was ICE and other federal agents

I’m just using your MAGA reasoning against you.

You said that Pretti’s amount of ammo indicates that he was there to shoot people. Then the same can be said of Rittenhouse.

 

[Mac-7]

I’m just using your MAGA reasoning against you.

You said that Pretti’s amount of ammo indicates that he was there to shoot people. Then the same can be said of Rittenhouse.

You are deflecting

There is no rational explanation for a bleeding heart liberal having a handgun and 45 rounds of ammo at a riot when the only targets he could find are federal law enforcement agents

 

[XponentialChaos]

You are deflecting

There is no rational explanation for a bleeding heart liberal having a handgun and 45 rounds of ammo at a riot when the only targets he could find are federal law enforcement agents

Right. But there is a rational explanation for Rittenhouse having lots of ammo.

MAGA logic is inconsistent. You tried.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

I’m just using your MAGA reasoning against you.

You said that Pretti’s amount of ammo indicates that he was there to shoot people. Then the same can be said of Rittenhouse.

That's "different".