Like the man said, no matter how many lib insurrectionists ICE is forced to shoot, it wont be enough

[Mac-7]

Right. But there is a rational explanation for Rittenhouse having lots of ammo.

MAGA logic is inconsistent. You tried.

Yes

Right or wrong Rittenhouse was confronting private citizens who were burning and looting

He was not trying to kill police officers

Petti was obviously planning to shoot federal law enforcement officers as an act of insurection

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Yes

Right or wrong Rittenhouse was confronting private citizens who were burning and looting

He was not trying to kill police officers

Petti was obviously planning to shoot federal law enforcement officers as an act of insurection

LOL.
Sure................Now pulling out your phone is an "insurrection".

 

[XponentialChaos]

Petti was obviously planning to shoot federal law enforcement officers as an act of insurection

That’s ridiculously stupid.

What‘s obvious is that you would be defending him if he was wearing a red hat.

 

[Mac-7]

That's "different".

View attachment 1212127

You are helping to condemn your own side

Violence in the streets begets more violence

The liberal cops allowed the floyd riots to continue and that brought rittenhouse to show up

Now the lib cops are making the same mistake and that is costing more wacko libs to lose their lives

 

[Mac-7]

That’s ridiculously stupid.

What‘s obvious is that you would be defending him if he was wearing a red hat.

Was he expecting a seige?

3 full clips of ammo suggest a lot of shooting

 

[XponentialChaos]

Was he expecting a seige?

3 full clips of ammo suggest a lot of shooting

Your MAGA reasoning already fell apart when we tried applying it to Rittenhouse.

 

[Mac-7]

Your MAGA reasoning already fell apart when we tried applying it to Rittenhouse.

I answered rittenhouse

He shot rioters

Petti was a rioter armed to shoot federal law enforcement officers

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

I answered rittenhouse

He shot rioters

Petti was a rioter armed to shoot federal law enforcement officers

With a PHONE?

 

[XponentialChaos]

I answered rittenhouse

He shot rioters

Petti was a rioter armed to shoot federal law enforcement officers

If someone brings lots of ammo to a protest, is that an indication that they intend to shoot a lot of people? Yes or no.

Try being consistent.

 

[Mac-7]

With a PHONE?

With 9mm semi auto handgun

 

[Mac-7]

If someone brings lots of ammo to a protest, is that an indication that they intend to shoot a lot of people? Yes or no.

Try being consistent.

No concealed carry holder needs that much ammo for self defense

Petti was not a peaceful protester

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

You are helping to condemn your own side

No, just exposing your hypocritical side.

Violence in the streets begets more violence

The liberal cops allowed the floyd riots to continue and that brought rittenhouse to show up

Then how did over 14,000 people get arrested?

Now the lib cops are making the same mistake and that is costing more wacko libs to lose their lives

 

[Zavulon]

They didn’t know. They should have determined if he’s actually a threat before murdering him.

Apart of all other questions, the cops couldn't be sure that he has no explosive device on him, nor that there are no other criminals around them, preparing another attack.

The trigger-happy morons shot first and asked questions later.

It is quite understandable in those circumstances. That's why I don't like idea of allowing civilians posses small conceivable firearms. It too often force cops to shoot first.

 

[Slade3200]

He may have been doing more than that

Like what? Trying to defend himself after getting jumped by a bunch of ice agents for trying to help a lady who got thrown to the ground?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

With 9mm semi auto handgun

The only people that pull that gun were he ICE wannabe Rambo's that pulled that 9mm, out of the back of his pants

 

[XponentialChaos]

No concealed carry holder needs that much ammo for self defense

Petti was not a peaceful protester

You didn’t answer the yes/no question, as I expected.

If he was wearing a red hat, you would support him doing so.

 

[Mac-7]

No, just exposing your hypocritical side.

Then how did over 14,000 people get arrested?

Arrested and released the same day

The pansy cops were paper tigers

 

[Mac-7]

You didn’t answer the yes/no question, as I expected.

If he was wearing a red hat, you would support him doing so.

He would not need so much ammo unless he planned to use it

 

[XponentialChaos]

Apart of all other questions, the cops couldn't be sure that he has no explosive device on him, nor that there are no other criminals around them, preparing another attack.


It is quite understandable in those circumstances. That's why I don't like idea of allowing civilians posses small conceivable firearms. It too often force cops to shoot first.

He might have a bomb, so it’s fine to shoot him?

wtf?

 

[Zavulon]

Like what? Trying to defend himself after getting jumped by a bunch of ice agents for trying to help a lady who got thrown to the ground?

ICE is a law enforcement agency, isn't it? And obstructing the work of law enforcement agencies may be a form of complicity in a crime, as far as I understand. If so, we have organised criminal group, armed with firearms and attacking policemen. Right?