SniperFire
Senior Member
Again, that is YOUR Straw Man. I said you don't need to know EVERYTHING to prove energy cannot be created or destroyed. Your moronic position is that if we don't know everything we can't know anything.The logic fail is on your part. Nobody has said that something is not true until it's proven. But logically speaking, when the study of science has brought us to conclusions regarding matters (like the fact that energy cannot be created) your insisting that it's not true requires positive proof for your position.
Sure he did. Ask Ed the Flat-earther if it is possible that science does not fully understand the nature of and origins of energy.
He simply will refuse to admit the possibility.
LOL
(watch this duck)
Hey Ed.
Is it possible that science does not know everything there is to know about the origin of energy?