- Nov 26, 2011
- 123,644
- 57,063
- 2,290
Explain how having an opposing viewpoint on certain scientific theories disqualifies hiim?
Oh and who appointed him to that position?
Should we then ban anyone who's viewpoint is different than ours?
Is this not a country where you're free to express your opinions and ideas without being punished for them?
I don't agree with everyone's opinion but I would defend their right to voice their opinion.
If a jackass like this guy had been around in the 50s, he would have been a stumbling block on our way to the moon.
He's a dumbass and should not be making decisions which affect our scientific achievements and turning us into an uncompetitive nation.
.
The 50's were one of the most faith-backed eras in American history, and science was nurtured and exploited in our great Christian nation - just like always.
Fail.
And the Klan was calling evolution a tool of Satan. It was not the ignorant jackasses like that who got us to the moon.
Nor was it people like you.
We succeeded in spite of people like you.
People like you had actually held us back. Until Sputnik in the late 50s. Then our nation woke up to the colossal mistake we had made in ignoring science and math.
.
Last edited: