Liberal women’s groups attack Coney Barrett For Hostile History Towards Reproductive Health & Rights - Can't Name Any

She apparently is in a penis-worshiping cult, pursuant to which she has taken some oath to enter into a master/slave contract with with guy named Jessie, which requires her to submit to this jessie in everything she does, even to spread her legs whenever he commands and allow him to dictate how she votes. She cannot take one oath that requires some sort of submission, sexual and otherwise, to a person outside of the U.S. Supreme Court and another that requires her to be fair to all Americans. Don't get me wrong. I don't care what these two do in their bedroom. How do you have a U.S. Supreme Court Justice who takes her S&M so seriously that she would throw the rights of millions of Americans under the bus to sustain it?

CrazyMad.gif
 
They break, you stupid fuck. Anyway, ( I now will now feel free to use the word "fucK" and all the rest of sexual talk), what the fuck is it any business of yours? This sexual contract that this woman has with this "husband" of hers, which apparently requires her to service him in every way, (he is NOT a member of the high court) instantly and without complaint, and requires her to "obey" any human with a penis, speaks against her being given a vote on the U.S. Supreme Court that would affect the personal lives of others. You people often speak about the LGBT "lifestyle" somehow being "shoved down [everyone's} throats," yet you want her to do the same.

clock_22.gif
 
Democrats, unstable Leftist Activists, and snowflake sheep REALLY need to learn that just because something comes out of their pie-hole does not make it true... In fact, more often than not what comes out of their mouth is BULLSHIT:


Case In Point:

"Barrett's history of hostility toward reproductive health and rights, expanded health care access, and more demonstrate that she will put Justice Ginsburg's long record of ensuring that everyone receives equal justice under the law at risk."
-- Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGill Johnson

WHAT 'hostility', Ms. Johnson?
.......<crickets>

THE TRUTH / FACT:
'The National Organization for Women, which is connected to a PAC that ENDORSED THE BIDEN HARRIS TICKET.

I AM SHOCKED!

:p





She apparently is in a penis-worshiping cult, pursuant to which she has taken some oath to enter into a master/slave contract with with guy named Jessie, which requires her to submit to this jessie in everything she does, even to spread her legs whenever he commands and allow him to dictate how she votes. She cannot take one oath that requires some sort of submission, sexual and otherwise, to a person outside of the U.S. Supreme Court and another that requires her to be fair to all Americans. Don't get me wrong. I don't care what these two do in their bedroom. How do you have a U.S. Supreme Court Justice who takes her S&M so seriously that she would throw the rights of millions of Americans under the bus to sustain it?
What is this stupid post about? I've never seen more useless tripe. Where is the S&M shit coming from? And people that say this stuff are probably referencing stuff from religion they don't even understand.....$10 bucks this is about something in the bible this person has no clue on it's meaning....just another talking point from the HUFFPO, and instead of questioning it and looking into it themselves, they rely on HUFFPO....now talk about cult like......the left is a massive cult that even scientologists laugh at.

Explain the garbage
Who in the hell relies on Huffpo? Are you not aware that wedding ceremonies in several "religious" groups required the bride to pledge that she will "obey" her husband? This was around centuries before there was anything known as the internet. it seems that "marriage" in many religions ad societies has, historically, meant a woman being subjugated to a man, rather than entering a partnership with a man.

In what culture or religion has a man's parents safeguarded him from sexuality until they can lead him, dressed in the purity of white as having no sexual history, to the sanctuary where he will be wed to a woman who also has been led to this sanctuary under the same conditions?

Were you a virgin (not having sex before) when you married the woman of your choice. Do you honor her, submit to her, love her in all things? If she says vote for a particular candidate, do you do it?

No. I cannot support a different sort of woman who has already promised to obey another human just because of his genitals. It's her choice to have what ever she wants in her bedroom, but she should not be in a position to impose her sexual fantasies on every American.
 
Democrats, unstable Leftist Activists, and snowflake sheep REALLY need to learn that just because something comes out of their pie-hole does not make it true... In fact, more often than not what comes out of their mouth is BULLSHIT:


Case In Point:

"Barrett's history of hostility toward reproductive health and rights, expanded health care access, and more demonstrate that she will put Justice Ginsburg's long record of ensuring that everyone receives equal justice under the law at risk."
-- Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGill Johnson

WHAT 'hostility', Ms. Johnson?
.......<crickets>

THE TRUTH / FACT:
'The National Organization for Women, which is connected to a PAC that ENDORSED THE BIDEN HARRIS TICKET.

I AM SHOCKED!

:p





She apparently is in a penis-worshiping cult, pursuant to which she has taken some oath to enter into a master/slave contract with with guy named Jessie, which requires her to submit to this jessie in everything she does, even to spread her legs whenever he commands and allow him to dictate how she votes. She cannot take one oath that requires some sort of submission, sexual and otherwise, to a person outside of the U.S. Supreme Court and another that requires her to be fair to all Americans. Don't get me wrong. I don't care what these two do in their bedroom. How do you have a U.S. Supreme Court Justice who takes her S&M so seriously that she would throw the rights of millions of Americans under the bus to sustain it?
What is this stupid post about? I've never seen more useless tripe. Where is the S&M shit coming from? And people that say this stuff are probably referencing stuff from religion they don't even understand.....$10 bucks this is about something in the bible this person has no clue on it's meaning....just another talking point from the HUFFPO, and instead of questioning it and looking into it themselves, they rely on HUFFPO....now talk about cult like......the left is a massive cult that even scientologists laugh at.

Explain the garbage
Who in the hell relies on Huffpo? Are you not aware that wedding ceremonies in several "religious" groups required the bride to pledge that she will "obey" her husband? This was around centuries before there was anything known as the internet. it seems that "marriage" in many religions ad societies has, historically, meant a woman being subjugated to a man, rather than entering a partnership with a man.

In what culture or religion has a man's parents safeguarded him from sexuality until they can lead him, dressed in the purity of white as having no sexual history, to the sanctuary where he will be wed to a woman who also has been led to this sanctuary under the same conditions?

Were you a virgin (not having sex before) when you married the woman of your choice. Do you honor her, submit to her, love her in all things? If she says vote for a particular candidate, do you do it?

No. I cannot support a different sort of woman who has already promised to obey another human just because of his genitals. It's her choice to have what ever she wants in her bedroom, but she should not be in a position to impose her sexual fantasies on every American.
But a pu$$y-grabbing pedophile who gropes and sniffs children should be President?
 
Who in the hell relies on Huffpo? Are you not aware that wedding ceremonies in several "religious" groups required the bride to pledge that she will "obey" her husband? This was around centuries before there was anything known as the internet. it seems that "marriage" in many religions ad societies has, historically, meant a woman being subjugated to a man, rather than entering a partnership with a man.

In what culture or religion has a man's parents safeguarded him from sexuality until they can lead him, dressed in the purity of white as having no sexual history, to the sanctuary where he will be wed to a woman who also has been led to this sanctuary under the same conditions?

Were you a virgin (not having sex before) when you married the woman of your choice. Do you honor her, submit to her, love her in all things? If she says vote for a particular candidate, do you do it?

No. I cannot support a different sort of woman who has already promised to obey another human just because of his genitals. It's her choice to have what ever she wants in her bedroom, but she should not be in a position to impose her sexual fantasies on every American.

tenor.gif
 
The vast majority of these 'Women's Groups' are Liberal activists / 'sleeper cells' that become activated to defend liberal progressive socialist Democrat women who embrace / share the only tolerated liberal agenda and ideology. Conservative women are on their own and 'fair game'. The Leftist 'Borg Collective' will not come to their defense, no matter how sexist, vile, or despicable the attack against them.
 
Democrats, unstable Leftist Activists, and snowflake sheep REALLY need to learn that just because something comes out of their pie-hole does not make it true... In fact, more often than not what comes out of their mouth is BULLSHIT:


Case In Point:

"Barrett's history of hostility toward reproductive health and rights, expanded health care access, and more demonstrate that she will put Justice Ginsburg's long record of ensuring that everyone receives equal justice under the law at risk."
-- Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGill Johnson

WHAT 'hostility', Ms. Johnson?
.......<crickets>

THE TRUTH / FACT:
'The National Organization for Women, which is connected to a PAC that ENDORSED THE BIDEN HARRIS TICKET.

I AM SHOCKED!

:p





She apparently is in a penis-worshiping cult, pursuant to which she has taken some oath to enter into a master/slave contract with with guy named Jessie, which requires her to submit to this jessie in everything she does, even to spread her legs whenever he commands and allow him to dictate how she votes. She cannot take one oath that requires some sort of submission, sexual and otherwise, to a person outside of the U.S. Supreme Court and another that requires her to be fair to all Americans. Don't get me wrong. I don't care what these two do in their bedroom. How do you have a U.S. Supreme Court Justice who takes her S&M so seriously that she would throw the rights of millions of Americans under the bus to sustain it?
Gee, I can't find those so called rights in the Constitution. Perhaps you could show us.
 
Where are Judge Barrett's rulings that back up all the tripe said about her? Cite her rulings and back up anti Amy claims with authority. Or just shut up.
 
Any person in a red state will be able to go to a blue state to kill their babies.

Also....just a thought, but.....use a fucking condom if you dont want to get preggers, you stupid fucks.

They break, you stupid fuck. Anyway, ( I now will now feel free to use the word "fucK" and all the rest of sexual talk), what the fuck is it any business of yours? This sexual contract that this woman has with this "husband" of hers, which apparently requires her to service him in every way, (he is NOT a member of the high court) instantly and without complaint, and requires her to "obey" any human with a penis, speaks against her being given a vote on the U.S. Supreme Court that would affect the personal lives of others. You people often speak about the LGBT "lifestyle" somehow being "shoved down [everyone's} throats," yet you want her to do the same.

I just want a neutral judge. I don't give a flying fuck about whatever games these two play in the privacy of their home, but their devotion to their sexual proclivities should not have an impact on national law.
I just want a neutral judge.

So you are glad Ginsberg is dead.
 
Democrats, unstable Leftist Activists, and snowflake sheep REALLY need to learn that just because something comes out of their pie-hole does not make it true... In fact, more often than not what comes out of their mouth is BULLSHIT:


Case In Point:

"Barrett's history of hostility toward reproductive health and rights, expanded health care access, and more demonstrate that she will put Justice Ginsburg's long record of ensuring that everyone receives equal justice under the law at risk."
-- Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGill Johnson

WHAT 'hostility', Ms. Johnson?
.......<crickets>

THE TRUTH / FACT:
'The National Organization for Women, which is connected to a PAC that ENDORSED THE BIDEN HARRIS TICKET.

I AM SHOCKED!

:p




The FemiNazis are still around? I was under the impression that NOW self-destructed.
:auiqs.jpg:
 
Democrats, unstable Leftist Activists, and snowflake sheep REALLY need to learn that just because something comes out of their pie-hole does not make it true... In fact, more often than not what comes out of their mouth is BULLSHIT:


Case In Point:

"Barrett's history of hostility toward reproductive health and rights, expanded health care access, and more demonstrate that she will put Justice Ginsburg's long record of ensuring that everyone receives equal justice under the law at risk."
-- Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGill Johnson

WHAT 'hostility', Ms. Johnson?
.......<crickets>

THE TRUTH / FACT:
'The National Organization for Women, which is connected to a PAC that ENDORSED THE BIDEN HARRIS TICKET.

I AM SHOCKED!

:p





She apparently is in a penis-worshiping cult, pursuant to which she has taken some oath to enter into a master/slave contract with with guy named Jessie, which requires her to submit to this jessie in everything she does, even to spread her legs whenever he commands and allow him to dictate how she votes. She cannot take one oath that requires some sort of submission, sexual and otherwise, to a person outside of the U.S. Supreme Court and another that requires her to be fair to all Americans. Don't get me wrong. I don't care what these two do in their bedroom. How do you have a U.S. Supreme Court Justice who takes her S&M so seriously that she would throw the rights of millions of Americans under the bus to sustain it?
What is this stupid post about? I've never seen more useless tripe. Where is the S&M shit coming from? And people that say this stuff are probably referencing stuff from religion they don't even understand.....$10 bucks this is about something in the bible this person has no clue on it's meaning....just another talking point from the HUFFPO, and instead of questioning it and looking into it themselves, they rely on HUFFPO....now talk about cult like......the left is a massive cult that even scientologists laugh at.

Explain the garbage
Who in the hell relies on Huffpo? Are you not aware that wedding ceremonies in several "religious" groups required the bride to pledge that she will "obey" her husband? This was around centuries before there was anything known as the internet. it seems that "marriage" in many religions ad societies has, historically, meant a woman being subjugated to a man, rather than entering a partnership with a man.

In what culture or religion has a man's parents safeguarded him from sexuality until they can lead him, dressed in the purity of white as having no sexual history, to the sanctuary where he will be wed to a woman who also has been led to this sanctuary under the same conditions?

Were you a virgin (not having sex before) when you married the woman of your choice. Do you honor her, submit to her, love her in all things? If she says vote for a particular candidate, do you do it?

No. I cannot support a different sort of woman who has already promised to obey another human just because of his genitals. It's her choice to have what ever she wants in her bedroom, but she should not be in a position to impose her sexual fantasies on every American.
Yes she does pledge that...but again, you dont know what that means...as a commielib you think it means S&M bedroom games......hell you lefties think hard work is a part of white supremacy.......and you support BLM with doesnt want a nuclear family, which means when the slave masters separated the children from the parent slaves, you guys endorse that....just another example of where progressives are cool with the tactics of slavery

you really want to live in a hedonistic, fucked up dystopia.....it's really really sad
 
FBI can't find the alleged liberal, antifa, skyscraper offices, even: Evidence of any widespread, liberal or left-wing organized cadre of partisan influence. When it comes to Red-State Governors, and their agenda: People can find the Conservative Agenda outcome, attached to public buildings in more than one Red-State.


World Famous Fable-Maker, Jesus ben Joseph, Son of Mary, called "Oh Christ," (if mostly in English): Concocted Abandonment as the Christian Message and Dogma in Matt 25: 14-30. Rather than providing support for household service workers, likely to become pregnant--or create a pregnancy: Out of the household a third of the service workers go. Not only is it "Outer Darkness," but the embellishment of weeping and gnashing of teeth is include.

Wolves on the prowl are apparently described: Fodder created from the Fable Maker's tale.

The arithmetic of fixed percentage raises of income--the usury in the story, alluding even to what Moses likely meant in Deut 23: 19-20: Has failed at long-term remedy, then, for thousands of years. The origins of subjugation of peoples likely go back to the application of food loans, coming out of the forests, maybe only 10,000 years ago.

The problem of the Dogma originates before the concept, Protestant, or even the concept Catholic or Christian. The Fable Maker said to render to Caesar that which is Roman, Render to the fictions of religions that which is fictions of religions. In the Arithmetic, everyone else gets nothing!

The Conservative outcome is becoming Red State apparent. Marx wasn't too up on the usury problem, either. Liberals and Socialists do tend to a concept of, "Reproductive Rights."

Support of the parents finds no friends at all, but especially in the prayers!

Finally, the Democratic Presidency of Bill Clinton would note: "It's the Economy, Stupid!" In the Fabled agenda, support of the parents is not so much. The agenda have to compared and contrasted. Bush was clueless, conceding that he had been taught that in a Recession, government should cut taxes. Problem: Half of federal tax forms--an upcoming subject(?)--had zero income tax liability already!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken Not Stirred!"
(Matt 20: 1-16, about the Stimulus and Obama-Biden Recovery: is mentioned not-so-much in the matter of origins, even! Liberals do support equal protection under law, for Born Persons. Close can at least be discussed, and often is discussed, and with no basis in any math!)
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top