Well, that didn't make any sense. I never said anything about Harvey Milk. I said that the American Republican Taliban party is a bunch of terrorists who threaten America with violence to get what they want, even when what they want is based on misinformation, disinformation, and half-truth.
You seem to think that kids think that two mommies or two daddies is "strange". Kids don't think that. Kids raised by a same-sex couple think of two mommies or two daddies as two mommies or two daddies who love them very much and want to educate them and protect them from harm as any parent should try to do for their children. Your irrational fear of what you don't understand is the only reason that you oppose gay marriage. You need to stop. It is not your right to impose your psychotic worldview on the rest of American society. You are wrong. You need to learn that. But if you could learn then you wouldn't be a Conservative Christian.
You should say something about Harvey Milk. Since he stands as the icon for the LGBT movement across the nation and the world, and since LGBT is about sexual behavior, you should pay close attention to the sexual behavior Harvey Milk was engaged in as "representative" of that cult-sex movement. It was sodomy upon homeless teen boys who were vulnerable and addled on drugs; also mentally ill. So much for consensual sex as being part of that movement.
A cult based on statutory rape is a terrible place to base a social movement.
And those children you talk about will one day pick up a book about their mommies' or daddies' hero and read what he did to children.
And those children you talk about will one day pick up on the biology class they just took where it takes a man and a woman to produce a baby, a baby like themselves.
And those children you talk about will wonder why one of their mommies dresses like, talks like and walks like a man, when for a fact she is not a man an the child knows it.
And those children you talk about will wonder why one of their daddies lisps more than the other and talks in falsetto, wiggling his hips like a woman, when for a fact he is not.
And those children who grow ever more sophisticated in their questioning nature as they age into adolescence, will begin to wonder why it is that one of their mommies who claims to be attracted to women is with a woman who looks, acts, walks and talks like a man.
And those children who grow ever more sophisticated in their questioning nature as they age into adolescence, will begin to wonder why it is that one of their daddies who claims to be attracted to men is with a man who looks, acts, walks and talks like a woman...
Crazy-making ideas like these cannot be a sanctioned part of the formative years of children of the next few generations we are raising as a villiage to keep this villiage intact for years to come. Children are not objects merely to be protected from harm by well-meaning [if non-reflective] parents. Children are our future society. They are spirits in their own right. They are vulnerable beings forming into their own independent minds, using logic to cipher their world and navigate it effectively. That's why questions from children can be so maddening. Here's an example of one. [and don't tell me this won't happen because we've seen that it does in the adult world of the LGBT cult inquisition every single day]
Child: "Mommy, you know how you say you aren't into men and you are attracted to my other mommy"?
Lesbian mom: "yes dear, I do"
Child: "Well, some kids at school were noticing that other mommy dresses like and looks like a man, and acts like one. Many of them thought she was a man until I told them."
Lesbian mom: [laughing it off] "oh yes dear, that's just her style".
Child: [using the logic in all childrens' minds] "Well then how come if she looks like and acts like a man and you say you like women, you are attracted to her?"
Lesbian mom: [voice tightening, scowling now] "Never mind! She's a woman and I love her for that!"
Child: "but mommy she doesn't look like a lady.."
Lesbian mom: "Enough! Now go outside and play!" [Exasperated, pours a tall glass of wine]
Of course the last few sentences of that dialogue can twist and turn a bit longer, depending on the LGBT's level of sophistication in manipulating language. But inevitably as the child ages and learns hypocrisy, the conversation will end the same way. Which is essentially telling the child that THEY are crazy or imagining things and that obvious logical dichotomies ought not to be explored!
Which is a longer way of saying "gaslighting the child".
