And yet you are the one that comes off as unhinged. I don't need to foment about NARTH. They have no credibility.
Facts please , lets have some facts - come on girl - you cant possibly be as dumb as you sound - lets have some fact
Dr. George Rekers, NARTH "doctor":
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, stated in the decision: "Dr. Cochran (Professor of Epidemiology and Statistics at the University of California in Los Angeles) also testified about errors in scientific methodology and reporting in Dr. Rekers’ study, stating that Dr. Rekers had failed to present an objective review of the evidence on those subjects. Cochran concluded that Dr. Rekers’ work did not meet established standards in the field. Another expert, Dr. Peplau (Professor of Psychology at the University of California in Los Angeles), testified that Dr. Rekers had omitted in his review of the scientific literature “other published, widely cited studies on the stability of actual relationships over time.”[48]
Dr. Paul Cameron, NARTH "doctor":
In 1983, the American Psychological Association expelled Cameron for non-cooperation with an ethics investigation. Position statements issued by the American Sociological Association, Canadian Psychological Association and the Nebraska Psychological Association have accused Cameron of misrepresenting social science research.[1]
In these anti gay marriage cases coming to court, lawyers arguing in favor of bigotry are having a harder and harder time finding actual scientists to back up their claims.
The universe of such experts, however, may not be large. In describing Dr. Rekers’s selection in the Florida case, Mr. McCollum told reporters last week, “There were only two willing to step forward and testify, and we searched a long time.”
Scandal Stirs Legal Questions in Anti-Gay Cases
Greetings Seahag, my apologies for the delay in replying to your post, I know you must have been absolutley devastated with anticipation, but alas I was involved in the real world.
Link # 1 - Re: an American psychologist and ordained Southern Baptist minister, a holy roller with a sheepsking, George Rekers lmao - you simply have to be kidding sweetheart. George is as much a scientist as any of the clowns you like to cite - which translated means - he's not much of a scientists at all . [I Thought at least you would take a shot at Jeffrey Santinover.] He as well as his polar opposites at the APA have abandoned Scientific Objectivity in favor of a political aagenda - In georges case it's a religous one . A very poor example and hardly represenaive of NARTH as a whole, or the very sound theory of Ex-Gay therapy. On this segment of your assignment, taking into consideration your limited mental capacities - I give you an A for effort - but a d minus for subtance.
Link # 2 - Re: Paul Cameron, Cameron has done politically incorrect work associating homosexuality with sexual abuse and has pointed out the reduced life expectancy within the Gay community. THis is TAboo and sacrelig as per the Fagmasters controlling the APA , he went against the mandates of Big Brother and invoked the wrath of its totalitarian dictators - for this he was expelled from the APA - Camerons work is bordering on brilliant , although not withoout minor flaws [Is anything done by human beings perfect _ I say Nay] Nobody has been able to debunk it. Cameron is a courageous and brilliant man , and history will prove him to be so . He is martyr and enemy of the Socio-Fascist Liberal Agenda. On this segment of your assignment I give an F [F for Fucked Up]
Link # 3 is simply a rehashing of the George Reker scenario and not worth commenting on a second time - Bu I'll be generous and give you a C for that segment.
The balance of your homework
In these anti gay marriage cases coming to court, lawyers arguing in favor of bigotry are having a harder and harder time finding actual scientists to back up their claims.
The universe of such experts, however, may not be large. In describing Dr. Rekers’s selection in the Florida case, Mr. McCollum told reporters last week, “There were only two willing to step forward and testify, and we searched a long time.”
...A long sentence that doesn't say much - of course they're having a hard time dumbass - what scientist wants his career ruined and life destroyed for speaking out against the Gay Lords and Socio-Fascists - look what they did to Paul Cameron ! The statement says that there were only two WILLING to come forward, the rest cowered.
Sorry SeaWytch - as stated , I do realize that you are working with very limited mental capacities but I have to give you an F on this homework assignment - better luck next time - do keep trying .....
[/quote]
