Of course, when Libs say "global warming" they use GLOBAL statistics, but when CON$ claim global cooling they not only use very LOCAL stats, they claim snow in the dead of Winter, even when the temp the day of the snowfall was above average, is a new Ice Age.
There's that RETARDED lie again.
Do you understand that snow happens when WARMER MOISTER air collides with the air at 30 deg?
Of course, when Libs say "global warming" they use GLOBAL statistics, but when CON$ claim global cooling they not only use very LOCAL stats, they claim snow in the dead of Winter, even when the temp the day of the snowfall was above average, is a new Ice Age.
There's that RETARDED lie again.
The decade from 1999 to 2009 has been the WARMEST in the history of direct instrument measurement.
So let's have fun with CON$ervaTard "logic:"
1999 to 2009 was the warmest decade in the history of direct instrument measurement, so we've been cooling since 1998.
Gee a few posts earlier we were not warming since 1998, now it's only 4 years.There's that RETARDED lie again.
The decade from 1999 to 2009 has been the WARMEST in the history of direct instrument measurement.
So let's have fun with CON$ervaTard "logic:"
1999 to 2009 was the warmest decade in the history of direct instrument measurement, so we've been cooling since 1998.
According to man-made global warming advocates, CO2 emissions are the main driver of climate change and natural weather patterns caused by sun activity and other native contributors play second fiddle.
But here we have UN climate scientists admitting that natural climate change contributors have eclipsed the effect of CO2 emissions for the past 10 years, even as carbon belchers like China and India have increased CO2 output at record levels!
Global temperatures have remained reasonably flat since a decline in 1998 and cooling trends are now being observed despite the fact that carbon dioxide levels have increased in the atmosphere (see graph below).
Indeed, the latest evidence from climatological surveys shows that the earths upper oceans and the troposphere, the primary indicators of climate change, have not been warming for the last four years.
Do you understand that snow happens when WARMER MOISTER air collides with the air at 30 deg?
What a moron!
Gee a few posts earlier we were not warming since 1998, now it's only 4 years.There's that RETARDED lie again.
The decade from 1999 to 2009 has been the WARMEST in the history of direct instrument measurement.
So let's have fun with CON$ervaTard "logic:"
1999 to 2009 was the warmest decade in the history of direct instrument measurement, so we've been cooling since 1998.
According to man-made global warming advocates, CO2 emissions are the main driver of climate change and natural weather patterns caused by sun activity and other native contributors play second fiddle.
But here we have UN climate scientists admitting that natural climate change contributors have eclipsed the effect of CO2 emissions for the past 10 years, even as carbon belchers like China and India have increased CO2 output at record levels!
Global temperatures have remained reasonably flat since a decline in 1998 and cooling trends are now being observed despite the fact that carbon dioxide levels have increased in the atmosphere (see graph below).
Indeed, the latest evidence from climatological surveys shows that the earth’s upper oceans and the troposphere, the primary indicators of climate change, have not been warming for the last four years.
Notice when CON$ lie about temp they ALWAYS use the UAH data that used the opposite sign to "correct" for diurnal satellite drift. Even after Christy and Spencer were caught with their cooked numbers and they were corrected and the correct chart was posted. CON$ NEVER use the correct data. Three guess why, and the first two don't count.
First of all it doesn't have to be " much warmer than usual" just warmer than the air it collides with. And the warm moist air that caused the bulk of the snow in the nor'easter that hit the east coast came from the Atlantic Ocean.Do you understand that snow happens when WARMER MOISTER air collides with the air at 30 deg?
What a moron!
I do understand that. I am wondering where this moisture was evaporated from. What superheated part of the earth did it come from?
In order for your claim to have any substance, you must know where this moisture came frmo and that it came from a part of the earth that is much warmer than usual.
First of all it doesn't have to be " much warmer than usual" just warmer than the air it collides with. And the warm moist air that caused the bulk of the snow in the nor'easter that hit the east coast came from the Atlantic Ocean.Do you understand that snow happens when WARMER MOISTER air collides with the air at 30 deg?
What a moron!
I do understand that. I am wondering where this moisture was evaporated from. What superheated part of the earth did it come from?
In order for your claim to have any substance, you must know where this moisture came frmo and that it came from a part of the earth that is much warmer than usual.
Christy and Spencer have already admitted that the chart you posted used the opposite sign in correcting for diurnal satellite drift. The chart I posted uses the correct sign and shows warming.Gee a few posts earlier we were not warming since 1998, now it's only 4 years.According to man-made global warming advocates, CO2 emissions are the main driver of climate change and natural weather patterns caused by sun activity and other native contributors play second fiddle.
But here we have UN climate scientists admitting that natural climate change contributors have eclipsed the effect of CO2 emissions for the past 10 years, even as carbon belchers like China and India have increased CO2 output at record levels!
Global temperatures have remained reasonably flat since a decline in 1998 and cooling trends are now being observed despite the fact that carbon dioxide levels have increased in the atmosphere (see graph below).
Indeed, the latest evidence from climatological surveys shows that the earth’s upper oceans and the troposphere, the primary indicators of climate change, have not been warming for the last four years.
Notice when CON$ lie about temp they ALWAYS use the UAH data that used the opposite sign to "correct" for diurnal satellite drift. Even after Christy and Spencer were caught with their cooked numbers and they were corrected and the correct chart was posted. CON$ NEVER use the correct data. Three guess why, and the first two don't count.
What's wrong you having a hard time reading, if you notice right above the first graph it states "Global temperatures have remained reasonably flat since a decline in 1998 and cooling trends are now being observed despite the fact that carbon dioxide levels have increased in the atmosphere (see graph below). "
Prove the graph I provided was incorrect!
