Let's have a conversation

[BackAgain]

Dismiss this as cavalierly as you wish. It may bite you in the special elections and mid-terms.

I agree that the usual midterm loss of Party Members in the House (for the Party in the White House) may not happen, this time around.

For one thing, President Trump has been doing an excellent job. The leftist apparatchik media have tried their best to spin it otherwise. But I sense that the People (even some Democrats, nowadays) see the media coverage for what it is. Bullshit. Non-objective. Highly partisan for the left. Unreliable. And rarely based on verifiable “sources.” If so, the logical move is to reward and support him.

Second: The public reaction (again, this even includes Democrats, to some extent) is visceral. And the more the shills for the left try to claim that the right is “seeking to politicize the assassination,” the more that reasonable people will jettison the Dims.

They may not see it. Or they don’t know how to handle it. But, either way, what they are doing can’t work.

The splintering of the Dims is nice to see.

 

[TemplarKormac]

The splintering of the Dims is nice to see.

Agreed.

 

[Dirk the Daring]

Would that be a conspiracy?

No, I think it would be stupidity.

 

[Dirk the Daring]

I wouldn’t celebrate his murder. I oppose murder. Even where the victim happens to be a race baiting divisive dishonest gray-mail artist.

I was not accusing you specifically, just the brain dead reactionaries that exist on BOTH sides of the political spectrum.

 

[Hurricanelover]

For those on the left who insist on having a 'conversation' about hot-button issues--remember that's all Charlie Kirk wanted to do.

"Let's have a conversation."

Charlie Kirk wanted to 'have a conversation,' and he got shot dead for it. Is it a conversation you want, or something else? Say, maybe, total capitulation to your own views of the world?

Think about that for a minute. Please.

The problem is his belief system is literally out of the dark ages. Why the **** would a gay man support and wish to advance this? The belief system that would have both of us hanging from trees?

 

[TemplarKormac]

The problem is his belief system is literally out of the dark ages. Why the **** would a gay man support and wish to advance this? The belief system that would have both of us hanging from trees?

Begging your pardon?

 

[Hurricanelover]

Begging your pardon?

He wants to ban homosexuality and abolish gay marriage. Didn't you know?

 

[TemplarKormac]

He wants to ban homosexuality and abolish gay marriage. Didn't you know?

Wherever did you find that information?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

So how's your conversation with the membership going? Getting any answers to your questions?

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

It’s all in your imagination; MAGA needs boogeymen.

And Charlie Kirk was not a boogeyman to the left? If not, explain his assassination and the ensuing celebrations.

 

[Mac1958]

Do you think it's only a "conversation" when one or both sides change their beliefs?

No.

 

[sparky]

your typical MAGA.

MAGA needs boogeymen.

MAGA isn't about Trump , or a cult konradv

it's a revolution dedicated to the freedom and prosperity of the American people

the left wants to paint it as a cult, because it exposes their failed policies and direction as a detriment to said attributes

when they finally own up to this, there will be 'conversation'

~S~

 

[frigidweirdo]

And Charlie Kirk was not a boogeyman to the left? If not, explain his assassination and the ensuing celebrations.

He was assassinated because someone wanted to do it, and they did it. Simple as.

And people will celebrate. Because there are such people.

That you're trying to make out that the WHOLE OF THE LEFT is in on this, that the WHOLE OF THE LEFT pulled the trigger and THE WHOLE OF THE LEFT celebrated, is pretty weird

 

[Mac1958]

I was not accusing you specifically, just the brain dead reactionaries that exist on BOTH sides of the political spectrum.

We're in no condition to even BEGIN to fix our problems right now. In order to just begin to fix a problem, you need -- at very least -- to be operating from both a shared reality and a shared goal. We're not even close to that.

 

[sparky]

That you're trying to make out that the WHOLE OF THE LEFT is in on this, that the WHOLE OF THE LEFT pulled the trigger and THE WHOLE OF THE LEFT celebrated, is pretty weird

Hasn't the left proved their stance on Charlie frigid one?

>>>

~S~

 

[konradv]

Dismiss this as cavalierly as you wish. It may bite you in the special elections and mid-terms.

The deification of Charlie Kirk is going to be on the mid-term ballot?! I’d be more worried about the effects of Trump’s increased authoritarianism.

 

[konradv]

No, I think it would be stupidity.

So, definitely in MAGA’s ballpark.

 

[konradv]

And Charlie Kirk was not a boogeyman to the left? If not, explain his assassination and the ensuing celebrations.

MAGA lies.

 

[konradv]

MAGA isn't about Trump , or a cult konradv
it's a revolution dedicated to the freedom and prosperity of the American people

Then why are you backing an authoritarian? What happens when he comes after your favorite comedian?

 

[Dirk the Daring]

So, definitely in MAGA’s ballpark.

I can poke some holes in that theory.