Let's have a conversation

Unless you condemn it, it's easy to assume you condone it.

Silence is golden.
I condemn killing anyone and for any reason. We all have the right to live (even though it may be in prison for the rest of our lives).

My post was not about condemning or condoning this act. It is about the fact that this one act does not represent fairly what we are all about.
 
I'm considering all aspects of this. I still believe JFK was shot from the fenced in parking lot next to the grassy knoll. I have a video with a gent in prison who I believe made that shot. Happy to share if you're interested.

I personally don't see how a shot from the roof would have hit the left neck where the wound is. Like I said earlier, I see something in the video I shared with something behind his ear right before he's hit and that something disappeared. However, seems like an odd shot from that side. I don't personally believe the kid shot him. I still believe the gentleman in the black shirt motions with his left arm half second before the shot. I don't know what to do with that, but it is very suspicious to me.

I've tried repeatedly to do a frame by frame of the dude coming off the roof and I don't see a rifle. The cloth in his flaps, if it were a rifle, it wouldn't flap.

The dude was indeed on the roof, the dude definitely ran after the shot, but I don't see a weapon in his hand and that's bugged me since day one.
There would be such a huge difference even in the sound recorded, between a close range shot and one from 200 yards away.

I don't want to argue for the sake of arguing.

If I get time, I will try to get some better stills from the best video I can find but, please consider how many cops from different departments would have to be in on a conspiracy like the one you are hinting at.
 
I've watched several videos of Kirk's "conversations" over the last few days.

They are the standard "I'm 100% right, you're 100% wrong" crap coming from both him and the liberal.

That's a debate, not a conversation. Nothing constructive is created in debates like that. No common ground or new ideas come from that. Kirk was just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Both ends have plenty of them.

Debates of any sort typically are not for the benefit of the people actually involved, they are specifically intended for the people listening.
 
He ended up hiring the former AG of California and a two term (I believe) US Senator. Pretty good qualifications for anyone male or female, black or white.

My question to you in our conversation....AG of the largest state in the union and US Senator. What better qualificaitons for VP would you want?
Irrelevant. The point is that gender and skin color mattered more than her qualifications. And as we've all seen, Harris was a veritable train wreck as VP.

Before you jump to any conclusions or misconstrue what I'm saying, Harris was not a bad VP pick because she was a woman of color. She just was, in spite of her gender, skin color and even her otherwise impressive resume.
 
Can you agree he has something wrapped in a dark cloth that he places in the gutter, then grabs it with his left hand, right before he drops to the ground?
yep, he had a backpack on when he went up. It's all I see something made of cloth. One would need to explain where the back pack went, the rifle wouldn't fit. At first I thought he put the stock in the backpack and the barrel extended out from that. But when I again tried a frame by frame, I don't see a barrell anywhere. And I don't see a towel.
 
When you post a germaine link, perhaps I’ll take a look at it. Your “conversation” style is apparently to bring up outliers nobody has ever heard of, label them, and pass that off as proof....
Then again, this one is better.

 
yep, he had a backpack on when he went up. It's all I see something made of cloth. One would need to explain where the back pack went, the rifle wouldn't fit. At first I thought he put the stock in the backpack and the barrel extended out from that. But when I again tried a frame by frame, I don't see a barrell anywhere. And I don't see a towel.
When he's coming off the roof, he's wearing the backpack, the thing in his hand is the gun, wrapped in the towel.

Authorities have not released it yet, but I guarantee the towel wrapped around the gun was dark blue or black.
 
Serious? It's an hour and 40 minutes video. Where are a few of the points where he did "quite poorly"
A woman at 1:09:35 did quite well, and Kirk had few substantive responses.
 
When he's coming off the roof, he's wearing the backpack, the thing in his hand is the gun, wrapped in the towel.

Authorities have not released it yet, but I guarantee the towel wrapped around the gun was dark blue or black.
I honestly don't see any backpack on his back.
 
Hitchens would have eviscerated Kirk. I would have loved to watch a fantasy debate between Chris and William F. Buckley.


Stupid OX. It's not a sporting event. It's right trying to stop wrong. Minimize the evil damage. The $38T crowd.l, slow thieves & Grifters. Educate a few youth to change off public school D programming. You board swine are too far gone. Over a decade not one of you evil criminals has wised up even one micrometer.
 
Irrelevant.
Qualifications are irrelevant? Are you sure you’re not a DEI hire?
The point is that gender and skin color mattered more than her qualifications. And as we've all seen, Harris was a veritable train wreck as VP.
Not true.
Before you jump to any conclusions or misconstrue what I'm saying, Harris was not a bad VP pick because she was a woman of color. She just was, in spite of her gender, skin color and even her otherwise impressive resume.
jennifer-lawrence-ok.gif


Yeah see, this is the problem.

He called her a DEI hire meaning that he--Kirk--is only considering her race and gender.

If you look at the qualifications--which is all you should look at (outside of background checks and that sort of thing) when hiring someone--she had what you even admitted was an “impressive resume”. You take her qualifications and put them on a white piece of paper next to the current VP for example, there is no question about her superiority to Vance.
 
15th post
So can we say the colleges themselves were also smart to "go after kids in college"?

Everyone pretty much understands that colleges - staff and professors - are largely liberal and that a lot of them put a liberal spin on the way they teach their courses. That's been a sticking point for conservatives for years.

So, can we be truly objective casting a jaundiced eye towards Kirk's motives when we know colleges and universities basically do the same thing?
In my opinion, the far right has had it in for academia over my whole life. Same shit, different year.
 
Qualifications are irrelevant? Are you sure you’re not a DEI hire?

Not true.

Yeah see, this is the problem.

He called her a DEI hire meaning that he--Kirk--is only considering her race and gender.
Joe Biden emphasized the importance of choice in selecting a Black woman for the Supreme Court.During a speech in 2020, he stated that he would prioritize nominating a Black woman to the Supreme Court, highlighting the significance of representation and diversity in the judiciary.
 
Then again, this one is better.


Becoming a problem where as folks like McVeigh, Koresh, Whitman, Root, and countless others are a problem.

The common thread between the imbalanced straight white guy mass shooters and the ones who are imbalanced homosexual is that none of them should have access to guns. Of course we’re not going to do anything about that self-evident fact.
 
Joe Biden emphasized the importance of choice in selecting a Black woman for the Supreme Court.During a speech in 2020, he stated that he would prioritize nominating a Black woman to the Supreme Court, highlighting the significance of representation and diversity in the judiciary.
He hired a black woman who was extremely well qualified. All you see is a black woman.
 
Back
Top Bottom