Let’s assume Trump declares victory then leaves

[Churchill]

Let’s assume Trump declares “victory” then leaves.

I suspect the Israelis have a plan set aside for that eventuality, they might threaten him in some way, perhaps a secret dossier or perhaps pressure to do him harm in the prinaries or maybe commercially or even worse.

Iran still “2 weeks away”

US no longer welcome anywhere in the region. Qatar? UAE? They paid billions to the Trumps for protection and their nations are on fire

Who is going to pay for rebuilding?

Can you imagine telling Americans we have to rebuild Gaza and Tel Aviv?

Iran has no reason to reach a ceasefire with Israel, maybe ever

Is this wrong?

 

[BackAgain]

Enrichment was allowed to them according the threaty. The very idea of treaty was that the states without nuclear weapons should also have access to the benefits of nuclear energy.

For which enrichment needs to reach only 5% or less.

I challenge you to share with us all your grasp of what purpose exists for the enrichment of Uranium to 60% level, other than to make it available for enrichment to 90%?

I’m expecting you to run-away from even trying to answer that question with honesty.

You say, that Iranian regime is Islamo-fascist, but this is just your opinion (may be not even opinion, but just calling the names).

No. It’s called observation and accuracy. You couldn’t comprehend those things.

International law doesn't say that only Christian countries should have access to nuclear power.

Good to know. Not actually under discussion nor anything remotely akin to anything I’ve posted.

Quite contrary, it says that all countries should have such access if they are not trying to make nuclear weapons.

Simpletons like you always ignore that condition. It’s a very significant one.

Of course it means. Back in time, countries like South Africa, Switzerland, Iraq, Lybia, North Korea, South Korea, Japan and many others though: "Should we have nuclear weapons or shouldn't? Will it increase our safety or decrease?" And some of them decided to cancel their nuclear weapon program, and some decided to boost them. And now they see, that following rules is punished and breaking the rules is rewarded.

Lol. Again. No. It means absolutely nothing of the sort.

It isn’t really funny. It’s more laughably pathetic. Iran wasn’t punished for following any rules. You’re a moron.

And now what Brazil or Mexico think about nuclear weapons? Right, now they know that only nuclear weapons can protect them. And they will search for it, one way or another.

. Sure, Nostradumbass. Sure.

Yes, I think. And I think for more than one move ahead.

No. You don’t. Neither of those two claims is true.

 

[BackAgain]

I suspect the Israelis have a plan set aside for that eventuality, they might threaten him in some way, perhaps a secret dossier or perhaps pressure to do him harm in the prinaries or maybe commercially or even worse.

Your “suspicion” is just you being irrational and spewing baseless shitlib imbecility.

So, it’s difficult to believe that anybody credits anything you post.

 

[Zavulon]

For which enrichment needs to reach only 5% or less.

I challenge you to share with us all your grasp of what purpose exists for the enrichment of Uranium to 60% level, other than to make it available for enrichment to 90%?

As I said earlier, there are many possible civilian purposes for high enriched Uranium, including small reactor, like for submarines.

I’m expecting you to run-away from even trying to answer that question with honesty.

No run away. There are civilian purposes, like medical reactors or small reactors.

No. It’s called observation and accuracy. You couldn’t comprehend those things.

If I couldn't comprehend those things, why do you use them as arguments? And no, there is no international law that allow the USA decide who can have accces to nuclear weapons and who can't.

It isn’t really funny. It’s more laughably pathetic. Iran wasn’t punished for following any rules. You’re a moron.

Of course it was. You attacked them (as well as Lybia and Iraq before) exactly because you knew that they are not making nuclear weapons.

 

[BackAgain]

As I said earlier, there are many possible civilian purposes for high enriched Uranium, including small reactor, like for submarines

Wrong. No such level of enrichment is anywhere near close to necessary for any purpose other than to further enrich it to the 90% level. And you couldn’t support your make-believe claim of your life depended on it.

No run away. There are civilian purposes, like medical reactors or small reactors.

Nope. Nowhere anywhere close to a need for such a high level of enrichment.

Your ignorance is on full public display.

If I couldn't comprehend those things, why do you use them as arguments?

So that others don’t get misled by your nonsense.

And no, there is no international law that allow the USA decide who can have accces to nuclear weapons and who can't.

Cool. I never said there was. You’re the moron pretending to suddenly care about international law. (One of the silliest oxymorons in history, by the way.)

Of course it was. You attacked them (as well as Lybia and Iraq before) exactly because you knew that they are not making nuclear weapons.

It’s tragic that a completely retarded spinner of bullshit (ie, you) can make such obviously ridiculous assertions.

You’re truly ridiculous.

 

[Zavulon]

Wrong. No such level of enrichment is anywhere near close to necessary for any purpose other than to further enrich it to the 90% level. And you couldn’t support your make-believe claim of your life depended on it.

Plain lie. There are a lot of possible uses for highly enriched Urainium.

Why Do We Use Highly Enriched Uranium Research Reactors (HEUs)?

Every so often we hear something in the news about nuclear reactors fueled with highly enriched uranium (HEU); usually with regards to...

www.ntanet.net

It can be used in research reactors, in medical reactors, in submarine reactors, in space reactors, in many other ways.

Nope. Nowhere anywhere close to a need for such a high level of enrichment.

As I said - it's plain and obvious lie.

So that others don’t get misled by your nonsense.

If others are smarter than me - they could see my mistakes by themselves. If they are stupier - your arguments won't work on them, too.

 

[Zincwarrior]

I don’t know about you, but I sleep better knowing Iran doesn’t have nukes and won’t get them. By the time it’s our fight it’ll be too late.

Vs. Pakistan?

Also they still have their nuke shit.

 

[BackAgain]

Plain lie. There are a lot of possible uses for highly enriched Urainium.

Yes. You lied. Some enrichment is necessary. 3 to 5% for reactors. A bit more (but less than 20%) for scientific research.
Again, name one purpose for 60% other than to go for 90%. But don’t just babble. Show your work. Links.

Why Do We Use Highly Enriched Uranium Research Reactors (HEUs)?

Every so often we hear something in the news about nuclear reactors fueled with highly enriched uranium (HEU); usually with regards to...

www.ntanet.net

It can be used in research reactors, in medical reactors, in submarine reactors, in space reactors, in many other ways.

Again, some enrichment is necessary. But not 60%.

As I said - it's plain and obvious lie

Yep, but it’s still you who lied. And you won’t even admit it now.

If others are smarter than me - they could see my mistakes by themselves. If they are stupier - your arguments won't work on them, too.

You babble an awful lot. Maybe you think it makes your lies less obvious.

It’s high time that you educate yourself:

IAEA Impact: Making the World Safer, One Research Reactor At a Time

During the night of 29 September 2014, a heavy transport plane took off from an air base in Kazakhstan after an operation to remove fuel and increase the security of a research reactor.

www.iaea.org

 

[Zavulon]

Yes. You lied. Some enrichment is necessary. 3 to 5% for reactors. A bit more (but less than 20%) for scientific research.
Again, name one purpose for 60% other than to go for 90%. But don’t just babble. Show your work. Links.

Are you banned by google or just denie reality? It's not that difficult to make a simple search by yourself.

https://fissilematerials.org/library/ma01.pdf

The USA, UK, France, Russia used Highly Enriched (more than 90%) Uranium as fuel, so was planned for Brazil, India and even Australia. Some see it as a loophole in NPT and potential vulnerability, but what is not prohibited, is allowed. One can enrich Uranium as much as he wants, while he is not planning to use it to make bombs.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The only nation on fire is Iran.

Wow, you better step outside your bubble for a second.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Again, name one purpose for 60% other than to go for 90%.

Simple, leverage.

Well that was easy.

A softball question for anyone who knows anything about any of this.

Welcome to square one, congratulations.

 

[Mac-7]

But you should have a plan for your own actions, according your (or your spiritual leader's) understanding of the God's plan, shouldn't you? "We should support Israel because...." Or "we should hate Iranians because..."
Or "I'm just following the orders of reverend Joe, who is the spiritual guru of our 15th Reformation of Truly Unchangeable Church of the Crist Middle East Liberator" or something...

If you want convince people that you are reasonable people, not just crazy religious fanatics, you should use arguments. May be religious arguments, but arguments.

The only reason I would argue with you is if it mattered to me what you think

Which I dont

I’ve given you my testament that God and His Son Jesus Christ are real

While its true that I have never met God in the flesh I have seen His creation and its good

But what you choose to think is your business and really does not interest me