Letitia James receives SUBPOENA from the DOJ for violating President Trumps' civil rights.

[Nostra]

In order to appoint an inferior officer, Congress needs to have given the AG authority to do so.

None of these statutes create an office for which the AG can place an inferior officer.

See: Jack Smith.

 

[Nostra]

The AG can’t appoint a special attorney unless Congress authorizes them to do so.

Since we have no authorization in law, they can’t.

Jack Smith anyone????

 

[ThisIsMe]

.
Read the quote again.

suggests that the broad unsupervised powers given to the Special Counsel might make him a “Superior Officer”

Clearly you're incorrect because the basis of her ruling cannot be found on something that is SUGGESTED MIGHT be the case.

No, the basis of the case is that even if he was an inferior officer, there is no legal authority to appoint such an inferior officer.

I told you the reason she made her ruling.

No, the basis of the case is that even if he was an inferior officer, there is no legal authority to appoint such an inferior officer.

If was the case, why did you all support smiths appointment?

Besides that, we see the legal authority to appoint inferior officers. It comes from the appointments clause, backed up by CFR, which was based on a law passed by congress.


Why is it you all were gung ho about smith, but when it comes to the investigation into a dem, you all are throwing up red flags?

 

[Marener]

I told you the reason she made her ruling.

You are wrong. Either you are intentionally lying, you believed someone else who was lying, or you just didn’t even bother to look up and misremembered. The fact remains you’re wrong.

If was the case, why did you all support smiths appointment?

Besides that, we see the legal authority to appoint inferior officers. It comes from the appointments clause, backed up by CFR, which was based on a law passed by congress.


Why is it you all were gung ho about smith, but when it comes to the investigation into a dem, you all are throwing up red flags?

I think Cannon is wrong. That said, the case could have gone on with a different prosecutor.

What I’m arguing for now is consistency. There’s no excuse for Trump to use prosecutors he once argued were illegally appointed.

 

[struth]

You are wrong. Either you are intentionally lying, you believed someone else who was lying, or you just didn’t even bother to look up and misremembered. The fact remains you’re wrong.

I think Cannon is wrong. That said, the case could have gone on with a different prosecutor.

What I’m arguing for now is consistency. There’s no excuse for Trump to use prosecutors he once argued were illegally appointed.

He’s not

You clearly don’t understand the ruling

 

[Marener]

He’s not

You clearly don’t understand the ruling

His own article and quote proved he wrong. You’re both morons.

 

[struth]

His own article and quote proved he wrong. You’re both morons.

I’m not talking about any other poster but you

I read the opinion and I’ve read your post, clearly showing you dont know what the opinion says

 

[Papageorgio]

He can try, but he has no real power.

Unless he presents it to a different judge.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Unless he presents it to a different judge.

It is fun to sit back and watch Mariner flail

 

[Marener]

Unless he presents it to a different judge.

If he lacks authority, then it makes no difference.

 

[ThisIsMe]

You are wrong. Either you are intentionally lying, you believed someone else who was lying, or you just didn’t even bother to look up and misremembered. The fact remains you’re wrong.

If you read the arguments, there are a few reasons for her decision, among them is thought that smith was considered a superior officer.

In surprising ruling, judge dismisses Trump's classified documents case

In a surprising ruling, the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump has been dismissed by federal Judge Aileen Cannon.

abcnews.go.com

Judge Aileen Cannon ruled Monday that Smith's appointment as special counsel overseeing the documents case was unconstitutional because Smith was not appointed by the president or confirmed by Congress.

As prescribed by the cotus.

I think Cannon is wrong. That said, the case could have gone on with a different prosecutor.

What I’m arguing for now is consistency. There’s no excuse for Trump to use prosecutors he once argued were illegally appointed.

You're arguing for consistency after the fact. You had no problem with smith being illegally appointed, right? But NOW, its a problem.

 

[Marener]

If you read the arguments, there are a few reasons for her decision, among them is thought that smith was considered a superior officer.

I did read the ruling. You didn’t. She never decided if he was a principal officer or an inferior officer. That’s just a fact.

You're arguing for consistency after the fact. You had no problem with smith being illegally appointed, right? But NOW, it’s a problem.

I’m arguing for consistency going forward. There was never any ruling about the constitutionality of a special counsel before.

But even after this ruling, Trump goes ahead and illegally appoints special counsels.

 

[Papageorgio]

If he lacks authority, then it makes no difference.

If they go ahead with a special prosecutor, the. It does matter, because if a judge rules they have authority then, they have it.

 

[Concerned American]

If they go ahead with a special prosecutor, the. It does matter, because if a judge rules they have authority then, they have it.

Marener is a moron. She makes no cognizant, provable point, has no legal background to interpret judicial rulings and can't even spell her own handle. A typical troll that disregards logic and facts.

 

[Marener]

If they go ahead with a special prosecutor, the. It does matter, because if a judge rules they have authority then, they have it.

Why would a judge rule they have authority? Cannon didn’t see any authority.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Marener is a moron. She makes no cognizant, provable point, has no legal background to interpret judicial rulings and can't even spell her own handle. A typical troll that disregards logic and facts.

Mariner just goes around in circles. He can't get past his own bias.

 

[toobfreak]

She certainly is a criminal and a vindictive asshole.

Now, now, BF, that isn't really true, is it? I think she is just a regular, everyday asshole, at least as far as many New Yorkers are concerned!

After all she ran her campaign on Prosecuting Trump.

But then, about 80-90% of all democrats are now basing their entire elections and campaigns for office on first making Trump an enemy, then wiping him out to save the planet, but only if you elect them first.

Now she deserves to get a piece of her own medicine.

About a full drump truck full I'd say.

 

[Mack The Finger]

I know what's it's like to be persecuted but I'm accustomed to it living in this country, it's been going on for decades. To have your rights so publicly violated and so many American cowards unwilling to say "this is wrong what they are doing to this man" is a real damn shame. That's not the America I grew up knowing of and respecting from afar.

Good Post

 

[ThisIsMe]

I did read the ruling. You didn’t. She never decided if he was a principal officer or an inferior officer. That’s just a fact.

I linked the statements.

I’m arguing for consistency going forward. There was never any ruling about the constitutionality of a special counsel before.

Of course, "going forward". Thats very convenient.

But even after this ruling, Trump goes ahead and illegally appoints special counsels.

Bondi appointed him

 

[Blisterfinger]

I linked the statements.




Of course, "going forward". Thats very convenient.




Bondi appointed him

You have to keep things VERY simple for moronor.