Letitia James receives SUBPOENA from the DOJ for violating President Trumps' civil rights.

[Concerned American]

It goes on to say that if the appeals court disagrees with her view on the statutory language for appointing an inferior officer, it could still be overturned if the court determines he was a principal officer, which is obvious.

Where is the quoted passage?

 

[Papageorgio]

What did you truncate? "Of course, however..."

Cannon never ruled on whether Smith was a primary or an inferior, she ruled that he needed Senate approval because the scope was outside the laws currently on the books, the only special prosecutor she thought worked with in their constitutional scope was the Iran Contra Special Prosecutor, can’t remember his name, she added in her decision that she believed Smith was acting as a primary but would let another court decide the matter, which is a coward ploy, however she shot down lamps all special prosecutors. Bondi can limit her Special prosecutor’s scope or go to the Senate and get one approved or she can roll the dice and take a chance that an appeals judge would rule the Bondi was well within the current laws.

 

[ThisIsMe]

None of your articles say she made a finding that he’s a superior officer.

So you can post as many articles as you want, they don’t say what you claim.

None of the statutes cited as legal authority for the appointment…gives the Attorney General broad inferior-officer appointing power or bestows upon him the right to appoint a federal officer with the kind of prosecutorial power wielded by Special Counsel Smith," Cannon wrote.

Why would she write that? Because the kind of prosecutorial power he had would rest only in a superior officer.

 

[Papageorgio]

Why would she write that? Because the kind of prosecutorial power he had would rest only in a superior officer.

She wrote it because she reasoned that even with the statutes, only one special prosecutor met the burden of not need to be confirmed by the Senate. So whether Smith acted like a primary or not , it was irrelevant to her ruling and Smith need Senate approval because.

 

[ThisIsMe]

She wrote it because she reasoned that even with the statutes, only one special prosecutor met the burden of not need to be confirmed by the Senate. So whether Smith acted like a primary or not , it was irrelevant to her ruling and Smith need Senate approval because.

Or, because under his appointment, he was acting in the role of a superior officer that needed senate confirmation.

The appointment clause clearly says there is a method by which department heads can appoint inferior officers.

 

[Papageorgio]

Or, because under his appointment, he was acting in the role of a superior officer that needed senate confirmation.

The appointment clause clearly says there is a method by which department heads can appoint inferior officers.

She didn’t rule on that portion, in her ruling she felt he didn’t have Senate approval to be an inferior or primary officer. So it didn’t matter what role he played. It is a confusing decision. Bondi still can get authority from the Senate or appoint someone herself and hope the court would rule differently. Many legal experts feel her interpretation was wrong.

 

[berg80]

I invite everyone, but especially trumples, to read IN FULL this letter from Letisha James' attorney, Abbe Lowell. As big an ask as this is I think if you read it with an open mind, fact check any errors you believe are presented, you may find yourself agreeing the investigation in to James is clearly a matter of revenge for her being able to win the case against Don. It is incredibly compelling.

Abbe Lowell letter to Ed Martin - Aug. 18, 2025

A letter sent Aug. 18, 2025 from Abbe Lowell, a lawyer for New York Attorney General Letitia James, to Ed Martin, the director of the Justice Department’s Weaponization Working Group.

www.documentcloud.org

 

[Marener]

Why would she write that? Because the kind of prosecutorial power he had would rest only in a superior officer.

She had the opportunity to declare he was a principal officer and didn’t.

That’s a fact.

It was not the basis of her ruling as you can see from your quote that she did determine the AG can’t appoint an inferior officer.

 

[ThisIsMe]

She didn’t rule on that portion, in her ruling she felt he didn’t have Senate approval to be an inferior or primary officer. So it didn’t matter what role he played. It is a confusing decision. Bondi still can get authority from the Senate or appoint someone herself and hope the court would rule differently. Many legal experts feel her interpretation was wrong.

Cannon last month heard arguments from Trump's attorneys seeking to have the classified documents case dismissed on the grounds that Smith was unlawfully appointed.

"The Framers gave Congress a pivotal role in the appointment of principal and inferior officers," Cannon wrote in her lengthy order Monday. "That role cannot be usurped by the Executive Branch or diffused elsewhere -- whether in this case or in another case, whether in times of heightened national need or not."

In surprising ruling, judge dismisses Trump's classified documents case

In a surprising ruling, the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump has been dismissed by federal Judge Aileen Cannon.

abcnews.go.com

 

[frigidweirdo]

If Trump were guilty of something egregious the world could accept accountability demanded on his part.

What he faced was in my opinion, and I stated so at the time; was an insulting, dangerous and alarming abuse of power and violation of his civil rights. To go after him with the courts for taking a loan from a bank that has unlimited funds to confirm the value of the collateral, independent of even the lender making a claim, has to be a violation of his rights and suitable for some judicial recourse.

Just because he is worth billions and is a well known figure doesn't mean he should be treated unfairly by the state. Justice must be blind and not vexation in nature. The lender didn't complain and even profited from the loan (not something they can't always say in lending).

Appraisal of any asset is always as much of an art as a science. Owner goes high, lender/buyer goes low, you generally meet at some number. If the bank had any questions in their confidence in the value they loaned against there is no way in hell they would give him a loan. At worst, they might knowingly accept a higher risk due to the property or client but ultimately it is THEIR business to know what risk is acceptable. It's certainly not criminal or in the purview of an AG in a state to intervene in this private transaction.

He didn't do anything wrong and nor did the lender. This was a private loan between two entities and Trump paid it back with interest. The fine leveled against him was right out of the Soviet playbook.

If you ever wanted to tell the world that "New York is not a place you want to invest your capital", by definition this case illustrated such a declaration.

I know what's it's like to be persecuted but I'm accustomed to it living in this country, it's been going on for decades. To have your rights so publicly violated and so many American cowards unwilling to say "this is wrong what they are doing to this man" is a real damn shame. That's not the America I grew up knowing of and respecting from afar.

Right, going after Trump for committing crimes goes against this human rights. So, if he wins ALL CRIMINALS will be able to do the same.

 

[frigidweirdo]

It wasn't just James, that creepy Trump hating judge Engeron should be disbarred for his absurd judgment against Trump.

Disbar anyone who hates Trump, just turn the US into a ******* dictatorship while you're at it.

 

[MarathonMike]

Disbar anyone who hates Trump, just turn the US into a ******* dictatorship while you're at it.

No, not anyone. Just that vile hateful ***** who announced when she was running for AG she will do everything in her power to bring down Trump. Is that clear enough for you?

 

[frigidweirdo]

No, not anyone. Just that vile hateful ***** who announced when she was running for AG she will do everything in her power to bring down Trump. Is that clear enough for you?

I mean, it's pretty clear that reality isn't your main focus.

 

[skye]

 

[Jroc]

Disbar anyone who hates Trump, just turn the US into a ******* dictatorship while you're at it.

Disbar anyone who's connected to Trump more like it.. that's what a a actually happened fraud

 

[Dragonlady]

Let's go!!! Justice is coming for AG James. Her Stalinist attempt to destroy Donald Trump is finally going to get full scrutiny. This is in addition to the investigation into her miraculous rise in net worth through crooked real estate deals.

NY AG Letitia James subpoenaed by Justice Department over $454M civil fraud case against Trump

James was hit with subpoenas as part of a grand jury probe by the Albany US Attorney’s Office into her office’s $454 million civil fraud case against President Trump.

nypost.com

The DOJ has no power over Letitia, James, or her prosecutions.

 

[Edgetho]

 

[Edgetho]

Disbar anyone who's connected to Trump more like it.. that's what a a actually happened fraud

Or kill them. Whichever is easier for dimocrap scum-sucking slime.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Did letitia not commit mortgage and bank fraud?

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Her and Jack Smith were the biggest out of line grandstanders and I’m looking forward to their just punishments