Let get the truth about South Africa

[IM2]

You say this

You are entirely WRONG. You are a racist. I am not.

But then you say this

If whites hadn't come to Africa, you would still be running around naked being chased by lions.

If you can’t see the irony embedded in these remarks. After all, to deny that you have no racism to black people, and then to cut loose with a racist generalization about black people is the epitome of self-contradiction, then you’re probably not prepared to enter a dialogue about much of anything.

I have nothing against black people.

There are three kinds of white racist

1) White bigots - They hate blacks. They use the n-word. They have views that even most whites would regard as racist. What blacks would call being openly racist. Examples: The Klan, David Duke, the American history X type.

2) White implicit racists – They do not hate blacks. But they still think black people are messed up and whites are not. They see black people less moral and intelligent and more violent.

These are the the type who ACT RACIST - WHEN REQUIRED.

Why ? Because you do not want to become an outcast among white people, particularly the white people in your own family or at school or work

Because racism is bad and most whites are not bad people, most whites cannot be racist. So racism is dead.

Therefore something must be wrong with black people. (Crime stats, IQ, white inventor arguments)

3) Whites with integrity – These are whites are trying to unlearn their racism. Examples: John Brown, Tim Wise.

On USMB I would guess that:

• 10% are white bigots,
• 89% are white implicit racists
• 1% are whites with integrity.

Your racism is implicit that is, it's pretty much like the majority of white people.

Of course in small minds like yours, any criticism of you or blacks in general, is racist. LMFAO.

Get over yourself.

They are racists. They talk down to ****** and try to cause outrage because the superior white race keeps them all down.
Its pathetic how they think. Poor insecure twats :/

You refuse to understand that we have documented evidence supporting us,

 

[IM2]

Even if they have to steal and murder to get the land?

Yes.

You don't debate with a white supremacist. You kill them and then dig the bastards up and kill them again because they didn't die hard enough the first time.

Nothing to steal because it was not there land in the first place.

What about black supremacists? Im trying to decide if i should put you on ignore since there isnt a reason to debate hateful racist assholes

Black supremacists? LOL!

 

[Asclepias]

Even if they have to steal and murder to get the land?

Yes.

You don't debate with a white supremacist. You kill them and then dig the bastards up and kill them again because they didn't die hard enough the first time.

Nothing to steal because it was not there land in the first place.

Its amazing how white people will claim you stole your land back from them.

That’s bullshit. The blacks living today in SF don’t own the land. WTF!

There are plenty of Blacks living in San Francisco that own land. I know because they are in my family.

that land belongs to the natives

You whites killed off all the natives. The tribe that had possession of that land was slaughtered by you violent people. I'm pretty sure they would be more inclined to us Blacks living on it especially since they looked Black themselves.

The Ohlone people

 

[Asclepias]

Even if they have to steal and murder to get the land?

Yes.

You don't debate with a white supremacist. You kill them and then dig the bastards up and kill them again because they didn't die hard enough the first time.

Nothing to steal because it was not there land in the first place.

What about black supremacists? Im trying to decide if i should put you on ignore since there isnt a reason to debate hateful racist assholes

Black supremacists? LOL!

If you dont ride with their bullshit it automatically makes you a Black supremacist. Where have you been?

 

[bgrouse]

In a way, I'm actually in favor of seizing the lands from whites, expelling the whites, and giving all the land to the blacks. That way, the blacks will starve and/or murder each other even faster, which is the best possible conclusion.

I only wish IM2 would go there to live (at least for as long as he lives) since it's apparently so nice there without the whites in power.

 

[bgrouse]

Yes.

You don't debate with a white supremacist. You kill them and then dig the bastards up and kill them again because they didn't die hard enough the first time.

Nothing to steal because it was not there land in the first place.

Its amazing how white people will claim you stole your land back from them.

That’s bullshit. The blacks living today in SF don’t own the land. WTF!

There are plenty of Blacks living in San Francisco that own land. I know because they are in my family.

that land belongs to the natives

You whites killed off all the natives. The tribe that had possession of that land was slaughtered by you violent people. I'm pretty sure they would be more inclined to us Blacks living on it especially since they looked Black themselves.

The Ohlone people

How do you know the "Ohlone people" didn't murder some other inhabitants to steal their land?

 

[gipper]

Yes.

You don't debate with a white supremacist. You kill them and then dig the bastards up and kill them again because they didn't die hard enough the first time.

Nothing to steal because it was not there land in the first place.

Its amazing how white people will claim you stole your land back from them.

That’s bullshit. The blacks living today in SF don’t own the land. WTF!

There are plenty of Blacks living in San Francisco that own land. I know because they are in my family.

that land belongs to the natives

You whites killed off all the natives. The tribe that had possession of that land was slaughtered by you violent people. I'm pretty sure they would be more inclined to us Blacks living on it especially since they looked Black themselves.

The Ohlone people

You are confusing whites of centuries ago with whites of today.

Why are you so stupid?

 

[TNHarley]

You say this

You are entirely WRONG. You are a racist. I am not.

But then you say this

If whites hadn't come to Africa, you would still be running around naked being chased by lions.

If you can’t see the irony embedded in these remarks. After all, to deny that you have no racism to black people, and then to cut loose with a racist generalization about black people is the epitome of self-contradiction, then you’re probably not prepared to enter a dialogue about much of anything.

I have nothing against black people.

There are three kinds of white racist

1) White bigots - They hate blacks. They use the n-word. They have views that even most whites would regard as racist. What blacks would call being openly racist. Examples: The Klan, David Duke, the American history X type.

2) White implicit racists – They do not hate blacks. But they still think black people are messed up and whites are not. They see black people less moral and intelligent and more violent.

These are the the type who ACT RACIST - WHEN REQUIRED.

Why ? Because you do not want to become an outcast among white people, particularly the white people in your own family or at school or work

Because racism is bad and most whites are not bad people, most whites cannot be racist. So racism is dead.

Therefore something must be wrong with black people. (Crime stats, IQ, white inventor arguments)

3) Whites with integrity – These are whites are trying to unlearn their racism. Examples: John Brown, Tim Wise.

On USMB I would guess that:

• 10% are white bigots,
• 89% are white implicit racists
• 1% are whites with integrity.

Your racism is implicit that is, it's pretty much like the majority of white people.

Of course in small minds like yours, any criticism of you or blacks in general, is racist. LMFAO.

Get over yourself.

They are racists. They talk down to ****** and try to cause outrage because the superior white race keeps them all down.
Its pathetic how they think. Poor insecure twats :/

You refuse to understand that we have documented evidence supporting us,

So you have evidence you are inferior? No wonder you are so insecure :/

 

[TNHarley]

Even if they have to steal and murder to get the land?

Yes.

You don't debate with a white supremacist. You kill them and then dig the bastards up and kill them again because they didn't die hard enough the first time.

Nothing to steal because it was not there land in the first place.

What about black supremacists? Im trying to decide if i should put you on ignore since there isnt a reason to debate hateful racist assholes

Black supremacists? LOL!

Ikr? There can be no such thing. All you guys apparently seem to know your place.

 

[IM2]

Even if they have to steal and murder to get the land?

Yes.

You don't debate with a white supremacist. You kill them and then dig the bastards up and kill them again because they didn't die hard enough the first time.

Nothing to steal because it was not there land in the first place.

What about black supremacists? Im trying to decide if i should put you on ignore since there isnt a reason to debate hateful racist assholes

Black supremacists? LOL!

If you dont ride with their bullshit it automatically makes you a Black supremacist. Where have you been?

Damn, I forgot that. I gotta try my best to remember that the next time I reply.

 

[IM2]

Its amazing how white people will claim you stole your land back from them.

That’s bullshit. The blacks living today in SF don’t own the land. WTF!

There are plenty of Blacks living in San Francisco that own land. I know because they are in my family.

that land belongs to the natives

You whites killed off all the natives. The tribe that had possession of that land was slaughtered by you violent people. I'm pretty sure they would be more inclined to us Blacks living on it especially since they looked Black themselves.

The Ohlone people

You are confusing whites of centuries ago with whites of today.

Why are you so stupid?

Oh no he's not confused.

But you have psychosis.

 

[IM2]

You say this

You are entirely WRONG. You are a racist. I am not.

But then you say this

If whites hadn't come to Africa, you would still be running around naked being chased by lions.

If you can’t see the irony embedded in these remarks. After all, to deny that you have no racism to black people, and then to cut loose with a racist generalization about black people is the epitome of self-contradiction, then you’re probably not prepared to enter a dialogue about much of anything.

I have nothing against black people.

There are three kinds of white racist

1) White bigots - They hate blacks. They use the n-word. They have views that even most whites would regard as racist. What blacks would call being openly racist. Examples: The Klan, David Duke, the American history X type.

2) White implicit racists – They do not hate blacks. But they still think black people are messed up and whites are not. They see black people less moral and intelligent and more violent.

These are the the type who ACT RACIST - WHEN REQUIRED.

Why ? Because you do not want to become an outcast among white people, particularly the white people in your own family or at school or work

Because racism is bad and most whites are not bad people, most whites cannot be racist. So racism is dead.

Therefore something must be wrong with black people. (Crime stats, IQ, white inventor arguments)

3) Whites with integrity – These are whites are trying to unlearn their racism. Examples: John Brown, Tim Wise.

On USMB I would guess that:

• 10% are white bigots,
• 89% are white implicit racists
• 1% are whites with integrity.

Your racism is implicit that is, it's pretty much like the majority of white people.

Of course in small minds like yours, any criticism of you or blacks in general, is racist. LMFAO.

Get over yourself.

They are racists. They talk down to ****** and try to cause outrage because the superior white race keeps them all down.
Its pathetic how they think. Poor insecure twats :/

You refuse to understand that we have documented evidence supporting us,

So you have evidence you are inferior? No wonder you are so insecure :/

We have evidence of your racism. 241 years of it minimum from July 4, 1776 to right now.

 

[IM2]

Even if they have to steal and murder to get the land?

Yes.

You don't debate with a white supremacist. You kill them and then dig the bastards up and kill them again because they didn't die hard enough the first time.

Nothing to steal because it was not there land in the first place.

What about black supremacists? Im trying to decide if i should put you on ignore since there isnt a reason to debate hateful racist assholes

Black supremacists? LOL!

Ikr? There can be no such thing. All you guys apparently seem to know your place.

Our place is exactly the same as yours.

 

[gipper]

You say this
But then you say this
If you can’t see the irony embedded in these remarks. After all, to deny that you have no racism to black people, and then to cut loose with a racist generalization about black people is the epitome of self-contradiction, then you’re probably not prepared to enter a dialogue about much of anything.
There are three kinds of white racist

1) White bigots - They hate blacks. They use the n-word. They have views that even most whites would regard as racist. What blacks would call being openly racist. Examples: The Klan, David Duke, the American history X type.

2) White implicit racists – They do not hate blacks. But they still think black people are messed up and whites are not. They see black people less moral and intelligent and more violent.

These are the the type who ACT RACIST - WHEN REQUIRED.

Why ? Because you do not want to become an outcast among white people, particularly the white people in your own family or at school or work

Because racism is bad and most whites are not bad people, most whites cannot be racist. So racism is dead.

Therefore something must be wrong with black people. (Crime stats, IQ, white inventor arguments)

3) Whites with integrity – These are whites are trying to unlearn their racism. Examples: John Brown, Tim Wise.

On USMB I would guess that:

• 10% are white bigots,
• 89% are white implicit racists
• 1% are whites with integrity.

Your racism is implicit that is, it's pretty much like the majority of white people.

Of course in small minds like yours, any criticism of you or blacks in general, is racist. LMFAO.

Get over yourself.

They are racists. They talk down to ****** and try to cause outrage because the superior white race keeps them all down.
Its pathetic how they think. Poor insecure twats :/

You refuse to understand that we have documented evidence supporting us,

So you have evidence you are inferior? No wonder you are so insecure :/

We have evidence of your racism. 241 years of it minimum from July 4, 1776 to right now.

My ancestors fought to free yours and some of them died for the cause. I know this means nothing to a dunce like you, but oh well.

I know you don't understand history, but if it weren't for whites, you would still be in Africa running around naked and just as ignorant.

 

[ATL]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

 

[Taz]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

 

[TNHarley]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

How do you tie trump into this?

 

[ATL]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

 

[ATL]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

How do you tie trump into this?

It’s a pattern of ideological thought that follows history.

 

[TNHarley]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

How do you tie trump into this?

It’s a pattern of ideological thought that follows history.

Oh lord. Please elaborate