Let get the truth about South Africa

[IM2]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback. They can sit around and cry all they want, nobody cares. It's like today's blacks, slavery didn't happen to them, they need to stop playing the victim card. Same thing with indians, they can mope around on a reservation or they can join the greater society and prosper. I bet most black South Africans weren't even alive during apartheid, so attacking whites is simply a racist thing.

So you are implying “might equals right”. Ok, now the tables have turned in SA where the blacks are now asserting their “might”, so in your purview, they are in the right.

I never said any such thing, go re-read my post and please try again.

"If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback."

Yes you did.

.

 

[ATL]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback. They can sit around and cry all they want, nobody cares. It's like today's blacks, slavery didn't happen to them, they need to stop playing the victim card. Same thing with indians, they can mope around on a reservation or they can join the greater society and prosper. I bet most black South Africans weren't even alive during apartheid, so attacking whites is simply a racist thing.

So you are implying “might equals right”. Ok, now the tables have turned in SA where the blacks are now asserting their “might”, so in your purview, they are in the right.

I never said any such thing, go re-read my post and please try again.

Oh, I read your post, which is why I responded. You say “If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback‘, you do know that the only reason they were attacking anyone was because the invaders were taking their land and resources. But you were ok with it, so might equals right.

Um...apartheid ended in the ‘90s. You really think most SA’s were not alive then? Really.

 

[IM2]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback. They can sit around and cry all they want, nobody cares. It's like today's blacks, slavery didn't happen to them, they need to stop playing the victim card. Same thing with indians, they can mope around on a reservation or they can join the greater society and prosper. I bet most black South Africans weren't even alive during apartheid, so attacking whites is simply a racist thing.

Another example of psychosis. Slavery wasn't the end. Apparently he 100 years after slavery didn't happen according to you. And for e Naïve Americans every day you whites think this us your country is an affront to them. As long as you occupy it,then they do live under the same oppression their ancestors dd. Apartheid ended in 1991 idiot, many of the South Africans living now did endure apartheid.

So who is living in the past? Because your last post would suggest that it's you.

But you said whites are living in the past. How?

.You have the same mentality whites had in the 1700's. Your ass lives in the past.

 

[ATL]

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback. They can sit around and cry all they want, nobody cares. It's like today's blacks, slavery didn't happen to them, they need to stop playing the victim card. Same thing with indians, they can mope around on a reservation or they can join the greater society and prosper. I bet most black South Africans weren't even alive during apartheid, so attacking whites is simply a racist thing.

Another example of psychosis. Slavery wasn't the end. Apparently he 100 years after slavery didn't happen according to you. And for e Naïve Americans every day you whites think this us your country is an affront to them. As long as you occupy it,then they do live under the same oppression their ancestors dd. Apartheid ended in 1991 idiot, many of the South Africans living now did endure apartheid.

So who is living in the past? Because your last post would suggest that it's you.

But you said whites are living in the past. How?

.You have the same mentality whites had in the 1700's. Your ass lives in the past.

True, sadly, many share that same mentality. It enables them to marginalize civil rights movements, and the biggest way they do it is by calling it racist.

 

[IM2]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

It's funny hw you white racists always want others to move on but your asses at still stuck in the past and wanting to return.to that past..

Like when?

Like Make America Great Again dumb ass.

Not looking to go backwards, but forwards to greatness. Is that all you've got?

You can't look forward when what you believe is backwards.

 

[Taz]

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback. They can sit around and cry all they want, nobody cares. It's like today's blacks, slavery didn't happen to them, they need to stop playing the victim card. Same thing with indians, they can mope around on a reservation or they can join the greater society and prosper. I bet most black South Africans weren't even alive during apartheid, so attacking whites is simply a racist thing.

So you are implying “might equals right”. Ok, now the tables have turned in SA where the blacks are now asserting their “might”, so in your purview, they are in the right.

I never said any such thing, go re-read my post and please try again.

"If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback."

Yes you did.

.

You guys are hard of English. If people are attacking us or anyone, nobody just sits by, they fight back. That has nothing to do with "might is right".

 

[Taz]

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback. They can sit around and cry all they want, nobody cares. It's like today's blacks, slavery didn't happen to them, they need to stop playing the victim card. Same thing with indians, they can mope around on a reservation or they can join the greater society and prosper. I bet most black South Africans weren't even alive during apartheid, so attacking whites is simply a racist thing.

So you are implying “might equals right”. Ok, now the tables have turned in SA where the blacks are now asserting their “might”, so in your purview, they are in the right.

I never said any such thing, go re-read my post and please try again.

Oh, I read your post, which is why I responded. You say “If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback‘, you do know that the only reason they were attacking anyone was because the invaders were taking their land and resources. But you were ok with it, so might equals right.

Um...apartheid ended in the ‘90s. You really think most SA’s were not alive then? Really.

I was talking about today, not the past. None of us were there, so it's not our problem. It's simply history. Don't blame whites today for that shit.

 

[Taz]

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback. They can sit around and cry all they want, nobody cares. It's like today's blacks, slavery didn't happen to them, they need to stop playing the victim card. Same thing with indians, they can mope around on a reservation or they can join the greater society and prosper. I bet most black South Africans weren't even alive during apartheid, so attacking whites is simply a racist thing.

Another example of psychosis. Slavery wasn't the end. Apparently he 100 years after slavery didn't happen according to you. And for e Naïve Americans every day you whites think this us your country is an affront to them. As long as you occupy it,then they do live under the same oppression their ancestors dd. Apartheid ended in 1991 idiot, many of the South Africans living now did endure apartheid.

So who is living in the past? Because your last post would suggest that it's you.

But you said whites are living in the past. How?

.You have the same mentality whites had in the 1700's. Your ass lives in the past.

So you have nothing. Got it. Now go eat a banana, you're the one living in the past.

 

[Taz]

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

It's funny hw you white racists always want others to move on but your asses at still stuck in the past and wanting to return.to that past..

Like when?

Like Make America Great Again dumb ass.

Not looking to go backwards, but forwards to greatness. Is that all you've got?

You can't look forward when what you believe is backwards.

So believing that the way forward for blacks is to stay in school and threat it with more importance is backwards? Um... no.

 

[IM2]

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback. They can sit around and cry all they want, nobody cares. It's like today's blacks, slavery didn't happen to them, they need to stop playing the victim card. Same thing with indians, they can mope around on a reservation or they can join the greater society and prosper. I bet most black South Africans weren't even alive during apartheid, so attacking whites is simply a racist thing.

So you are implying “might equals right”. Ok, now the tables have turned in SA where the blacks are now asserting their “might”, so in your purview, they are in the right.

I never said any such thing, go re-read my post and please try again.

Oh, I read your post, which is why I responded. You say “If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback‘, you do know that the only reason they were attacking anyone was because the invaders were taking their land and resources. But you were ok with it, so might equals right.

Um...apartheid ended in the ‘90s. You really think most SA’s were not alive then? Really.

I was talking about today, not the past. None of us were there, so it's not our problem. It's simply history. Don't blame whites today for that shit.

Today you are a racist and living. That's what you get blamed for. .And you will be blamed for the racism you have benefitted from.

 

[IM2]

It's funny hw you white racists always want others to move on but your asses at still stuck in the past and wanting to return.to that past..

Like when?

Like Make America Great Again dumb ass.

Not looking to go backwards, but forwards to greatness. Is that all you've got?

You can't look forward when what you believe is backwards.

So believing that the way forward for blacks is to stay in school and threat it with more importance is backwards? Um... no.

Given that blacks have been doing that for over 150 years, what you believe is based upon a bunch of racist assertions that started in the past.

 

[gipper]

They are racists. They talk down to ****** and try to cause outrage because the superior white race keeps them all down.
Its pathetic how they think. Poor insecure twats :/

You refuse to understand that we have documented evidence supporting us,

So you have evidence you are inferior? No wonder you are so insecure :/

We have evidence of your racism. 241 years of it minimum from July 4, 1776 to right now.

My ancestors fought to free yours and some of them died for the cause. I know this means nothing to a dunce like you, but oh well.

I know you don't understand history, but if it weren't for whites, you would still be in Africa running around naked and just as ignorant.

Your ancestors did not fight to free mine. I understand history quite well, you seem to have the problem.

We have been through this before, but apparently you come here new every day.

They did fight to free your ancestors. They were devote Christians and devout abolitionists. Read history.

 

[IM2]

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback. They can sit around and cry all they want, nobody cares. It's like today's blacks, slavery didn't happen to them, they need to stop playing the victim card. Same thing with indians, they can mope around on a reservation or they can join the greater society and prosper. I bet most black South Africans weren't even alive during apartheid, so attacking whites is simply a racist thing.

Another example of psychosis. Slavery wasn't the end. Apparently he 100 years after slavery didn't happen according to you. And for e Naïve Americans every day you whites think this us your country is an affront to them. As long as you occupy it,then they do live under the same oppression their ancestors dd. Apartheid ended in 1991 idiot, many of the South Africans living now did endure apartheid.

So who is living in the past? Because your last post would suggest that it's you.

But you said whites are living in the past. How?

.You have the same mentality whites had in the 1700's. Your ass lives in the past.

So you have nothing. Got it. Now go eat a banana, you're the one living in the past.

All I need is your opinion. Like you telling me to go eat a banana. That shows how your ass still has the same racist attitude whites had in the 1700's. That's living in the past and you're doing it.

 

[Marion Morrison]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

It's funny hw you white racists always want others to move on but your asses at still stuck in the past and wanting to return.to that past..

I look forward to the future! The future of watching you grow older and older, still waiting for that reparations check that never seems to arrive.

 

[impuretrash]

Who invented the modern conception of human rights? Who wrote the laws abolishing slavery? What about US civil rights legislation? That's right.

 

[IM2]

You refuse to understand that we have documented evidence supporting us,

So you have evidence you are inferior? No wonder you are so insecure :/

We have evidence of your racism. 241 years of it minimum from July 4, 1776 to right now.

My ancestors fought to free yours and some of them died for the cause. I know this means nothing to a dunce like you, but oh well.

I know you don't understand history, but if it weren't for whites, you would still be in Africa running around naked and just as ignorant.

Your ancestors did not fight to free mine. I understand history quite well, you seem to have the problem.

We have been through this before, but apparently you come here new every day.

They did fight to free your ancestors. They were devote Christians and devout abolitionists. Read history.

I have read plenty of history and whites did fight to free my ancestors.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

'south africa' is very violent , probably one of the most violent places in the world . Farmers are tortured and murdered and most of them are White , descendants of good hard working people . Get rid of them and you just might starve IM2 .

They descended from rapists, murderers, and robbers. That's how they got the land. I won't be starving if they are removed from that stolen land

You might not be, but the South Africans will starve. The same thing happened when your buddy mugabe stole all the white farms in zimbabwe. That country was once the bread basket of Africa, now it can't even feed itself.

I doubt that anyone will starve. And really whites need to shut up about Mugabe. For 887 years Zimbabwe was doing quite fine. Whites decided to colonize a fully functioning nation and ruined it.

LOL, Rhodesia was a gem of Africa, Zimbabwe is a tarnish of Africa.

Mugabe destroyed it all.

 

[IM2]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

It's funny hw you white racists always want others to move on but your asses at still stuck in the past and wanting to return.to that past..

I look forward to the future! The future of watching you grow older and older, still waiting for that reparations check.

You keep on watching and I'll keep on getting my retirement check.. So look forward to the future of a dead America because ****** thought it was funny to break spiritual law by enslaving people and not ever paying them.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

and a bit of info on 'sud african' murders of Boer Farmers . --- #FarmMurders hashtag on Twitter --- check it out IM2 .

No. The boer farmers killed to get that land.

'
As did Bantu peoples, keep in mind the San Bushman are the indigenous peoples of Southern Africa, today the San Bushman is on the verge of getting their heritage permanently destroyed, the Bushman shall vanish from the Earth if these patterns continue.

 

[IM2]

'south africa' is very violent , probably one of the most violent places in the world . Farmers are tortured and murdered and most of them are White , descendants of good hard working people . Get rid of them and you just might starve IM2 .

They descended from rapists, murderers, and robbers. That's how they got the land. I won't be starving if they are removed from that stolen land

You might not be, but the South Africans will starve. The same thing happened when your buddy mugabe stole all the white farms in zimbabwe. That country was once the bread basket of Africa, now it can't even feed itself.

I doubt that anyone will starve. And really whites need to shut up about Mugabe. For 887 years Zimbabwe was doing quite fine. Whites decided to colonize a fully functioning nation and ruined it.

LOL, Rhodesia was a gem of Africa, Zimbabwe is a tarnish of Africa.

Mugabe destroyed it all.

Mugabe didn't destroy shit Rhodes did.