Let get the truth about South Africa

[ATL]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

How do you tie trump into this?

It’s a pattern of ideological thought that follows history.

Oh lord. Please elaborate

What part are you having trouble with? The link between what is posted in this thread and what the arguments against desegregation were like? The link between the apartheid apologists and the confederacy apologists? Where would you like to start?

 

[Taz]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback. They can sit around and cry all they want, nobody cares. It's like today's blacks, slavery didn't happen to them, they need to stop playing the victim card. Same thing with indians, they can mope around on a reservation or they can join the greater society and prosper. I bet most black South Africans weren't even alive during apartheid, so attacking whites is simply a racist thing.

 

[TNHarley]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

How do you tie trump into this?

It’s a pattern of ideological thought that follows history.

Oh lord. Please elaborate

What part are you having trouble with? The link between what is posted in this thread and what the arguments against desegregation were like? The link between the apartheid apologists and the confederacy apologists? Where would you like to start?

I am asking you how you tie trump into an individuals beliefs.
Sounds like that would be like 47 fallacies in one sentence.
Please explain, so i dont think you are a complete moron. TIA

 

[ATL]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback. They can sit around and cry all they want, nobody cares. It's like today's blacks, slavery didn't happen to them, they need to stop playing the victim card. Same thing with indians, they can mope around on a reservation or they can join the greater society and prosper. I bet most black South Africans weren't even alive during apartheid, so attacking whites is simply a racist thing.

So you are implying “might equals right”. Ok, now the tables have turned in SA where the blacks are now asserting their “might”, so in your purview, they are in the right.

 

[TNHarley]

I dont blame them for what they are doing. Then again, the constant circle of violence and hatred is stupid as ****. Its like when we kill civilians while hunting terrorists. When we do that, we create more terrorists.
If civilized countries cant learn from the same constant mistakes, why should we expect shitholes to?

 

[ATL]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

How do you tie trump into this?

It’s a pattern of ideological thought that follows history.

Oh lord. Please elaborate

What part are you having trouble with? The link between what is posted in this thread and what the arguments against desegregation were like? The link between the apartheid apologists and the confederacy apologists? Where would you like to start?

I am asking you how you tie trump into an individuals beliefs.
Sounds like that would be like 47 fallacies in one sentence.
Please explain, so i dont think you are a complete moron. TIA

I don’t have any concerns about what your personal inventory of my mental capabilities are. The implication you made speaks for itself, so that is an issue you will have to work out internally before expecting me to assist in helping you reach a conclusion based upon a fallacy. Which is ironic, considering you were the one to bring the notion of fallacies into this exchange between us.

 

[TNHarley]

How do you tie trump into this?

It’s a pattern of ideological thought that follows history.

Oh lord. Please elaborate

What part are you having trouble with? The link between what is posted in this thread and what the arguments against desegregation were like? The link between the apartheid apologists and the confederacy apologists? Where would you like to start?

I am asking you how you tie trump into an individuals beliefs.
Sounds like that would be like 47 fallacies in one sentence.
Please explain, so i dont think you are a complete moron. TIA

I don’t have any concerns about what your personal inventory of my mental capabilities are. The implication you made speaks for itself, so that is an issue you will have to work out internally before expecting me to assist in helping you reach a conclusion based upon a fallacy. Which is ironic, considering you were the one to bring the notion of fallacies into this exchange between us.

So you cant explain it. You just choose to sound like an idiot. Got it.

 

[Marion Morrison]

You say this

You are entirely WRONG. You are a racist. I am not.

But then you say this

If whites hadn't come to Africa, you would still be running around naked being chased by lions.

If you can’t see the irony embedded in these remarks. After all, to deny that you have no racism to black people, and then to cut loose with a racist generalization about black people is the epitome of self-contradiction, then you’re probably not prepared to enter a dialogue about much of anything.

I have nothing against black people.

There are three kinds of white racist

1) White bigots - They hate blacks. They use the n-word. They have views that even most whites would regard as racist. What blacks would call being openly racist. Examples: The Klan, David Duke, the American history X type.

2) White implicit racists – They do not hate blacks. But they still think black people are messed up and whites are not. They see black people less moral and intelligent and more violent.

These are the the type who ACT RACIST - WHEN REQUIRED.

Why ? Because you do not want to become an outcast among white people, particularly the white people in your own family or at school or work

Because racism is bad and most whites are not bad people, most whites cannot be racist. So racism is dead.

Therefore something must be wrong with black people. (Crime stats, IQ, white inventor arguments)

3) Whites with integrity – These are whites are trying to unlearn their racism. Examples: John Brown, Tim Wise.

On USMB I would guess that:

• 10% are white bigots,
• 89% are white implicit racists
• 1% are whites with integrity.

Your racism is implicit that is, it's pretty much like the majority of white people.

It appears racism is pervading your mind.

 

[Marion Morrison]

How do you tie trump into this?

It’s a pattern of ideological thought that follows history.

Oh lord. Please elaborate

What part are you having trouble with? The link between what is posted in this thread and what the arguments against desegregation were like? The link between the apartheid apologists and the confederacy apologists? Where would you like to start?

I am asking you how you tie trump into an individuals beliefs.
Sounds like that would be like 47 fallacies in one sentence.
Please explain, so i dont think you are a complete moron. TIA

I don’t have any concerns about what your personal inventory of my mental capabilities are. The implication you made speaks for itself, so that is an issue you will have to work out internally before expecting me to assist in helping you reach a conclusion based upon a fallacy. Which is ironic, considering you were the one to bring the notion of fallacies into this exchange between us.

So, whose sock are you?

 

[ATL]

It’s a pattern of ideological thought that follows history.

Oh lord. Please elaborate

What part are you having trouble with? The link between what is posted in this thread and what the arguments against desegregation were like? The link between the apartheid apologists and the confederacy apologists? Where would you like to start?

I am asking you how you tie trump into an individuals beliefs.
Sounds like that would be like 47 fallacies in one sentence.
Please explain, so i dont think you are a complete moron. TIA

I don’t have any concerns about what your personal inventory of my mental capabilities are. The implication you made speaks for itself, so that is an issue you will have to work out internally before expecting me to assist in helping you reach a conclusion based upon a fallacy. Which is ironic, considering you were the one to bring the notion of fallacies into this exchange between us.

So you cant explain it. You just choose to sound like an idiot. Got it.

If you think I sound like an idiot, then you are hearing yourself speak.

 

[ATL]

It’s a pattern of ideological thought that follows history.

Oh lord. Please elaborate

What part are you having trouble with? The link between what is posted in this thread and what the arguments against desegregation were like? The link between the apartheid apologists and the confederacy apologists? Where would you like to start?

I am asking you how you tie trump into an individuals beliefs.
Sounds like that would be like 47 fallacies in one sentence.
Please explain, so i dont think you are a complete moron. TIA

I don’t have any concerns about what your personal inventory of my mental capabilities are. The implication you made speaks for itself, so that is an issue you will have to work out internally before expecting me to assist in helping you reach a conclusion based upon a fallacy. Which is ironic, considering you were the one to bring the notion of fallacies into this exchange between us.

So, whose sock are you?

The one that is attempting to post on topic. Feel free to reciprocate.

 

[Marion Morrison]

That’s bullshit. The blacks living today in SF don’t own the land. WTF!

There are plenty of Blacks living in San Francisco that own land. I know because they are in my family.

that land belongs to the natives

You whites killed off all the natives. The tribe that had possession of that land was slaughtered by you violent people. I'm pretty sure they would be more inclined to us Blacks living on it especially since they looked Black themselves.

The Ohlone people

You are confusing whites of centuries ago with whites of today.

Why are you so stupid?

Oh no he's not confused.

But you have psychosis.

You say this
But then you say this
If you can’t see the irony embedded in these remarks. After all, to deny that you have no racism to black people, and then to cut loose with a racist generalization about black people is the epitome of self-contradiction, then you’re probably not prepared to enter a dialogue about much of anything.
There are three kinds of white racist

1) White bigots - They hate blacks. They use the n-word. They have views that even most whites would regard as racist. What blacks would call being openly racist. Examples: The Klan, David Duke, the American history X type.

2) White implicit racists – They do not hate blacks. But they still think black people are messed up and whites are not. They see black people less moral and intelligent and more violent.

These are the the type who ACT RACIST - WHEN REQUIRED.

Why ? Because you do not want to become an outcast among white people, particularly the white people in your own family or at school or work

Because racism is bad and most whites are not bad people, most whites cannot be racist. So racism is dead.

Therefore something must be wrong with black people. (Crime stats, IQ, white inventor arguments)

3) Whites with integrity – These are whites are trying to unlearn their racism. Examples: John Brown, Tim Wise.

On USMB I would guess that:

• 10% are white bigots,
• 89% are white implicit racists
• 1% are whites with integrity.

Your racism is implicit that is, it's pretty much like the majority of white people.

Of course in small minds like yours, any criticism of you or blacks in general, is racist. LMFAO.

Get over yourself.

They are racists. They talk down to ****** and try to cause outrage because the superior white race keeps them all down.
Its pathetic how they think. Poor insecure twats :/

You refuse to understand that we have documented evidence supporting us,

So you have evidence you are inferior? No wonder you are so insecure :/

We have evidence of your racism. 241 years of it minimum from July 4, 1776 to right now.

Did the mailman just deliver your reparations check?































Nope!

 

[IM2]

Of course in small minds like yours, any criticism of you or blacks in general, is racist. LMFAO.

Get over yourself.

They are racists. They talk down to ****** and try to cause outrage because the superior white race keeps them all down.
Its pathetic how they think. Poor insecure twats :/

You refuse to understand that we have documented evidence supporting us,

So you have evidence you are inferior? No wonder you are so insecure :/

We have evidence of your racism. 241 years of it minimum from July 4, 1776 to right now.

My ancestors fought to free yours and some of them died for the cause. I know this means nothing to a dunce like you, but oh well.

I know you don't understand history, but if it weren't for whites, you would still be in Africa running around naked and just as ignorant.

Your ancestors did not fight to free mine. I understand history quite well, you seem to have the problem.

 

[IM2]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

It's funny hw you white racists always want others to move on but your asses at still stuck in the past and wanting to return.to that past..

 

[Taz]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback. They can sit around and cry all they want, nobody cares. It's like today's blacks, slavery didn't happen to them, they need to stop playing the victim card. Same thing with indians, they can mope around on a reservation or they can join the greater society and prosper. I bet most black South Africans weren't even alive during apartheid, so attacking whites is simply a racist thing.

So you are implying “might equals right”. Ok, now the tables have turned in SA where the blacks are now asserting their “might”, so in your purview, they are in the right.

I never said any such thing, go re-read my post and please try again.

 

[Taz]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

It's funny hw you white racists always want others to move on but your asses at still stuck in the past and wanting to return.to that past..

Like when?

 

[IM2]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback. They can sit around and cry all they want, nobody cares. It's like today's blacks, slavery didn't happen to them, they need to stop playing the victim card. Same thing with indians, they can mope around on a reservation or they can join the greater society and prosper. I bet most black South Africans weren't even alive during apartheid, so attacking whites is simply a racist thing.

Another example of psychosis. Slavery wasn't the end. Apparently he 100 years after slavery didn't happen according to you. And for e Naïve Americans every day you whites think this us your country is an affront to them. As long as you occupy it,then they do live under the same oppression their ancestors dd. Apartheid ended in 1991 idiot, many of the South Africans living now did endure apartheid.

 

[IM2]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

It's funny hw you white racists always want others to move on but your asses at still stuck in the past and wanting to return.to that past..

Like when?

Like Make America Great Again dumb ass.

 

[Taz]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

There can be no “moving on” when the reason they are there in the first place isn’t taken into consideration. That’s like blaming the Native Americans for the Trail of Tears, or only blaming the US for killing the redcoats.

If indians were attacking us en masse there would be blowback. They can sit around and cry all they want, nobody cares. It's like today's blacks, slavery didn't happen to them, they need to stop playing the victim card. Same thing with indians, they can mope around on a reservation or they can join the greater society and prosper. I bet most black South Africans weren't even alive during apartheid, so attacking whites is simply a racist thing.

Another example of psychosis. Slavery wasn't the end. Apparently he 100 years after slavery didn't happen according to you. And for e Naïve Americans every day you whites think this us your country is an affront to them. As long as you occupy it,then they do live under the same oppression their ancestors dd. Apartheid ended in 1991 idiot, many of the South Africans living now did endure apartheid.

So who is living in the past? Because your last post would suggest that it's you.

But you said whites are living in the past. How?

 

[Taz]

So, after reading the posts here, what has been established is that there are some members that are outraged over the whites in SA being oppressed by the government, having land that was taken from the indigenous people returned, but they have zero concern when apartheid was flourishing. Even to the point that they are calling those that highlight the atrocities that occurred under apartheid, racists, for speaking about it....

Yea, I totally see how Trump won based upon middle ‘murica’s silent voice....

I'd like to think they've moved on from apartheid, but no, tit for tat in a continual cycle is what's happening, just like an old hillbilly feud, and you're ok with that.

It's funny hw you white racists always want others to move on but your asses at still stuck in the past and wanting to return.to that past..

Like when?

Like Make America Great Again dumb ass.

Not looking to go backwards, but forwards to greatness. Is that all you've got?