aris2chat
Gold Member
- Feb 17, 2012
- 18,678
- 4,687
- 280
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The result will be an explosion of child prostitutes, standing on every street corner in every city in California. The police will be powerless to do anything about it. I saw the same thing happen in the 1980's when the homelessness situation got out of hand.
Your headline is shocking but it gives the wrong impression. After reviewing the actual legislation,SB 1322, it became clearer that the republican author in your link was being purposely misleading.
You miss the point. A person who is NOT committing a crime CANNOT be taken into custody. That would be an unconstitutional seizure, a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which reads:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The Democrats who authored this bill and voted for this are mostly lawyers, who KNOW exactly what they are doing. They KNOW that preventing police from arresting child prostitutes will have the effect of legalizing it for all intents and purposes.
This is a major agenda item for Democrats, sexualizing minors and warping them with their perverted tendencies. That is why a nine-year-old transgender child is now on the cover of National Geographic:
View attachment 104575
The author is incorrect when he says these Democrats are "well intentioned."
They are not.
They know EXACTLY what they are doing.
The result will be an explosion of child prostitutes, standing on every street corner in every city in California. The police will be powerless to do anything about it. I saw the same thing happen in the 1980's when the homelessness situation got out of hand.
What would be a better way of handling it? Is criminalizing these children, who are really victims - the best way?
Then stop being a Democrat, because you're on the side of the child abusers if you are.This is sick...
The abuser of children should die.
The result will be an explosion of child prostitutes, standing on every street corner in every city in California. The police will be powerless to do anything about it. I saw the same thing happen in the 1980's when the homelessness situation got out of hand.
Rights of the Child 'nonsense'? What rights shouldn't children have? Life? Liberty? Does that nonsense extend to a fetus? Or is it just once a child is born should it's rights be stripped away? And why do Conservatives seem to love to poo poo the concept of rights, unless they want to buy an AR 15?The author is incorrect when he says these Democrats are "well intentioned."
They are not.
They know EXACTLY what they are doing.
The UN tried something similar back in the 70s, connected with the "rights of the child" nonsense.
More about the story the biased OP link failed to provide:Then stop being a Democrat, because you're on the side of the child abusers if you are.This is sick...
The abuser of children should die.
You miss the point. A person who is NOT committing a crime CANNOT be taken into custody. That would be an unconstitutional seizure, a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which reads:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The Democrats who authored this bill and voted for this are mostly lawyers, who KNOW exactly what they are doing. They KNOW that preventing police from arresting child prostitutes will have the effect of legalizing it for all intents and purposes.
This is a major agenda item for Democrats, sexualizing minors and warping them with their perverted tendencies. That is why a nine-year-old transgender child is now on the cover of National Geographic:
View attachment 104575
You said:A person who is NOT committing a crime CANNOT be taken into custody. That would be an unconstitutional seizure, a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
so, are you saying a human being is the same thing as a human being's personal, non living possessions???You miss the point. A person who is NOT committing a crime CANNOT be taken into custody. That would be an unconstitutional seizure, a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which reads:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The Democrats who authored this bill and voted for this are mostly lawyers, who KNOW exactly what they are doing. They KNOW that preventing police from arresting child prostitutes will have the effect of legalizing it for all intents and purposes.
This is a major agenda item for Democrats, sexualizing minors and warping them with their perverted tendencies. That is why a nine-year-old transgender child is now on the cover of National Geographic:
View attachment 104575