Leftists, this teen must be crushed!!!

By your assumption that all transgender are child molesters... that's what makes you a bigot.

When they are openly, actively going after children, involving children in their perverted activities, then yes, this makes them child molesters. This makes them pedophiles.

And it takes no ordinary level of madness and evil, but an extraordinary Incel Joe level of madness and evil, to characterize one as a “bigot” for desiring children to be protected from obvious pedophiles.
 

Here we have a minor who was transitioned before reaching adulthood, and now regrets it.

But too late, she has already had her perfectly normal body parts mutilated, and she can never have children.

Now she is suing anyone and everyone who helped her transition.

This teen must be crushed into ash, otherwise, only more of this will occur, and the next thing you know it won't be allowed at all.

As we now, the Swamp will never allow this, so it should not be hard to take the teens will to live away by crushing her into dust.
I've been going through this with my youngest for a few years.
I haven't found anyone coercing to the kid or me.
If anything, they're careful to distinguish between actual and social driven responses.

Crushed?
I feel for them.
Where were their parents?

I as a parent would have preferred a different outcome but my kid has to live their life and I have to live mine.
During the process she's gone from a C-D student and will graduate early with honors.
She's happy.
She's got career plans.

As a parent I could not ask for more.
 
Male pedophiles who go after boys, who go after the same sex as themselves. So yes, “gays”.

A heterosexual man who was a pedophile would only be interested in going after little girls, not little boys.

Only a faggot would be interested in going after little boys.

As I’ve said before, gay or closeted gay. Why would Joe think differently?
 
I never claimed that all transgenders are child molesters.

I’ve made the specific claim that men dressed in grotesque parodies of women is promoted by leftist ideologues for the purpose of sexualization and grooming of children.

Your religion of woke’ism is what shouldn’t be foisted on children.

Your woke’ist religion that promotes convicted child molesters reading sexually explicit material to children is perverse and dangerous.

The woke’ist ideology that seeks to deny the biological fact that there are only two genders is laughable. To suggest to a child that gender is meaningless is to undermine a basic fact of biology and a fundamental concept of reality.

You and lil miss hot mess would make a lovely couple.

If doing trans shows in front of children won’t influence them, then why don’t we allow “black face” shows stereotyping blacks in front of children?
 
HOw about minding your own business in general?



It's all a conspiracy!!!


Did you just say you didn't have specific numbers?


I suspect a lot of that is because 1) these therapies take place over years and 2) A lot of these treatments are highly confidential.. again, HIPAA.


actually, they'd probably be in more trouble if they denied her care and she killed herself after the school bully grabbed her ta-tas.

Again, I've stopped wasting time trying to reason with bigots, I just crush them like bugs.



Shush, the grownups are talking.

I'd have the exact same position if it was a male to female transitioner. He/She has every right to sue her doctor if there was valid malpractice.

HOw about minding your own business in general?

Because someone has to speak out when adults are trying to allow 6 -12 year olds to make life altering decisions.

It's all a conspiracy!!!

Well, considering you can find stats for nearly everything you want on the internet, but form some reason, stats on trans gender treatments by specific ages…not easy to find…

Did you just say you didn't have specific numbers?

Not on a specific age, the article says that there is a 100% jump in people claiming gender dysphoria in the 6-17 year old range..I want to know how that breaks down by age.

I suspect a lot of that is because 1) these therapies take place over years and 2) A lot of these treatments are highly confidential.. again, HIPAA.

The first part could be, but I’m not really talking about treatments at the end, I’m talking about breaking down all these gender dysphoria and when treatment started, for each age in that data.

HIPPA isn’t a concern since no personal information would be released. They already have data to state that the age range is 6-17 which means they probably also have the data that shows how that breaks down by specific age, they just won’t post that data. It would be interesting to find out how many of them skewed more toward the 6 yr old range, and toward the 17 yr old range.

actually, they'd probably be in more trouble if they denied her care and she killed herself after the school bully grabbed her ta-tas.

That’s why they have a wide ranging field of psychology. And, I’m THIS case, you might be correct, we don’t know, how much effort did they punt into getting her psychological help before they just gave in to her wishes.

That doesn’t, however, have anything to do with the hundreds of thousands of other teens that are gender dysphoric, and who knows how many of those are getting sex altering treatment suggested to them?

Again, I've stopped wasting time trying to reason with bigots, I just crush them like bugs.

Where does bigotry come into this? Have I said anything about people shouldn’t be allowed to get sex change surgery? No…I said KIDS shouldn’t be able to do it because there are too many unknowns, and they themselves may not even know, but you’re perfectly fine putting a 6 year old on puberty blockers, when they are still developing both mentally and physically.
 
Except that's not even a good analogy, as Brockman was the driving force behind the therapy she got. Since gender confirmation surgery isn't illegal, it's not a good comparison.



Um, okay. I could just tell them that I was a prophet who had spoken to God and he was telling me to seal them to get them a seat in heaven... oh, wait, that shit didn't work for Joseph Smith, either.

Okay, now that I've gotten the obligatory Mormon Cheap Shot(TM) out of the way, medical treatment isn't rape. She needed a buy in from her parents, her doctors (a team of them) AND of course, had to agree to the procedure herself. So not quite the same as a rape, as much as you guys want to pretend it is.



No, it's part of making them more understanding and compassionate, clearly something you lack. Nobody is going to become gay from seeing a drag queen anymore than they would by watching a Bugs Bunny cartoon. Sexuality is more complicated than that.



How big do you think these laps are, exactly? Never mind, don't want to know.



First, I don't believe that being trans is any more a mental illness than being gay or being a woman. Yet 50 years ago, people like you said homosexuality was a mental illness. 150 years ago, proper men thought that women's anxieties were brought about by having a uterus (the word "Hysteria" deriving from the Latin "hystericus" or suffering in the womb).

This is therapy with proven results that are beneficial.

So I will say it again for the slow learners. If there was actual medical malpractice here, I'm all for holding the people responsible. But if they gave the best treatment based on what the patient was telling them, there's not an issue here. And her filing seems... less than impressive.


Ok joe, so if your idea is that because she really wanted it that means it’s ok, then we should let 13 year olds drink, and smoke, get tattoos, go to bars, I mean if they really want it, they should be able to make those decisions for themselves, right? If it’s laws that are getting in the way of those things, then we should abolish those laws, because if a teen has the capacity to make choices that can alter their body and mind, then they should be able to make other life decisions for themselves too, right?
 
As I’ve said before, gay or closeted gay. Why would Joe think differently?

Why does he think that a boy can be a girl, or vice versa?

Really, when you deny the hard distinction between male and female, then you also deny any basis for distinguishing homosexual from heterosexual. Lies and madness are built upon lies and madness.
 
Last edited:
HOw about minding your own business in general?
Because someone has to speak out when adults are trying to allow 6 -12 year olds to make life altering decisions.

“What I particularly admire in him is the firm stand he has taken, not only against the oppressors of his countrymen, but also against those opportunists who are always ready to compromise with the Devil. He perceives very clearly that the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it.”

—Albert Einstein, speaking of Pablo Casals​
 
Living in Mormon Bob's head. Holy shit, he's been ranting about me all afternoon!
Why do you think Drag Queen Story Time should include convicted child molesters?
If you can't discuss the issue honestly, not sure why there's a point talking to you...

Mental illness is not cured nor mitigated by forcing sane people to accept the delusions of mental cases as valid.

A “transgender” person has no choice but to ultimate face and deal with the reality that h'orsh'/it is not what h'orsh'/it thinks h'orsh'/it is or wants to be.

A “trans women” will never be an actual woman, no matter what quasi-medical Frankensteinery he has done to himself, no matter how successfully others are deceived into seeing him as a woman. He will always be a man, albeit a mutilated, ruined, fucked-up form of a man; and nothing can ever change that.
Again, Bob, tell me which one of these used to be a man.

transgender-beauty-pageant-women.jpg


Not going to happen.

Our side is based on truth, and your side is based on insane lies.

Natural selection will do its thing, and your side is exactly the sort of detritus that natural selection functions to clear away.

Funny, the Slave Owner and the racist said the same kind of thing 150 years ago. Darwin even predicted the extinction of black people in "Descent of Man".

The girlfriend and I went to the Field Museum this week. (I mention this because you seem to obsess on such matters). one of the things we saw were the Hoffman Statues, that purported to show the superiority of white people. (They were commissioned in the 1930s). Now the museum shows those statues, but with a long video explaining why the racist attitudes behind their commissioning was wrong.

Sixty years ago, it was illegal to marry outside your race in this country.

Fifty years ago, homosexuality was listed as being a mental illness. Now gays can get married.

Progress marches on, always to be more inclusive, not less.

Society owes her a huge apology for that.

The very worst claims she made, the very worst predictions she made about the intent of the faggot-rights movement with regard to children, have been proven, over time, to be understated. We now have you deprave freaks openly going after children in a far worse way than she ever imagined.

No one is going after children. I suspect that if you talked to a group of young people outside your cult, most of them would be straight, but they'd still be horrified by your phobias.
 
When they are openly, actively going after children, involving children in their perverted activities, then yes, this makes them child molesters. This makes them pedophiles.

And it takes no ordinary level of madness and evil, but an extraordinary @Incel Joe level of madness and evil, to characterize one as a “bigot” for desiring children to be protected from obvious pedophiles.

No one is going after children. teaching kids not to be bigots is not going after them.

Why does he think that a boy can be a girl, or vice versa?

Really, when you deny the hard distinction between male and female, then you also deny any basis for distinguishing homosexual from heterosexual. Lies and madness are built upon lies and madness.

Maybe because- get this - not everyone has the same attitudes towards sex, and progress has changed.

For instance, when I was a kid, one of my cousins had a kid out of wedlock and moved in with her boyfriend for a few years before they got married.
It was a great scandal. My grandparents were supposedly spinning in their graves.

Today, most people live together before marriage. It's actually considered the norm. And frankly, I can even see an advantage to it, you find out all those annoying things about your partner before you've signed over half your property.

“What I particularly admire in him is the firm stand he has taken, not only against the oppressors of his countrymen, but also against those opportunists who are always ready to compromise with the Devil. He perceives very clearly that the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it.”

—Albert Einstein, speaking of Pablo Casals

There is no Devil. And frankly, reading your Bible, I'm having a hard time picturing him as the Bad Guy.

God is the one who endorses slavery, child murder, genocide, etc. etc. etc. Satan just killed Job's children on a wager with God.

Not to say that there isn't some good stuff in the Bible, but it lost on the "Christian Right"

1678588146516.webp
 
As I’ve said before, gay or closeted gay. Why would Joe think differently?

I'm not black or Asian. I think racism is wrong.
I'm not a woman. I think misogyny is wrong.
I'm not Jewish. I think what the Nazis did was wrong. (I also think what the Zionists are doing to the Palestinians is wrong, for the same reason).
I'm not gay, I think homophobia is wrong.
I'm not transgender, I think transphobia is wrong.

Can I make it any simpler for you.

I don't extend my tolerance to religion, for the most part, because I don't see religion as a good influence. For every Christian who sees Jesus calling him to good works, there's one who thinks Jesus is telling him to be an intolerant bigot.
 
I'm not black or Asian. I think racism is wrong.
I'm not a woman. I think misogyny is wrong.
I'm not Jewish. I think what the Nazis did was wrong. (I also think what the Zionists are doing to the Palestinians is wrong, for the same reason).
I'm not gay, I think homophobia is wrong.
I'm not transgender, I think transphobia is wrong.

Can I make it any simpler for you.

I don't extend my tolerance to religion, for the most part, because I don't see religion as a good influence. For every Christian who sees Jesus calling him to good works, there's one who thinks Jesus is telling him to be an intolerant bigot.

Sure Joe, so you blame the young for the actions you for the adults. 🤦‍♂️
 
Because someone has to speak out when adults are trying to allow 6 -12 year olds to make life altering decisions.

Yup, that's why they have parents. If the parents are transphobic bigots who try to slap some Jesus into her, that's why we have legal guardians.

Well, considering you can find stats for nearly everything you want on the internet, but form some reason, stats on trans gender treatments by specific ages…not easy to find…

Right, it's all a conspiracy!!!

Not on a specific age, the article says that there is a 100% jump in people claiming gender dysphoria in the 6-17 year old range..I want to know how that breaks down by age.

I'm sure you do. but the reason why there's a increase is because they are better at recognizing it now.

HIPPA isn’t a concern since no personal information would be released. They already have data to state that the age range is 6-17 which means they probably also have the data that shows how that breaks down by specific age, they just won’t post that data. It would be interesting to find out how many of them skewed more toward the 6 yr old range, and toward the 17 yr old range.
Nope, HIPAA specifically prohibits release of medical information.

That’s why they have a wide ranging field of psychology. And, I’m THIS case, you might be correct, we don’t know, how much effort did they punt into getting her psychological help before they just gave in to her wishes.

That doesn’t, however, have anything to do with the hundreds of thousands of other teens that are gender dysphoric, and who knows how many of those are getting sex altering treatment suggested to them?

I wouldn't know. And I've said repeatedly, if the doctors screwed up here, they should pay malpractice settlements. I'm just not seeing malpractice in this rambling 35 page filing. I'm seeing a very disturbed young woman who insisted she was something she wasn't. But since HIPAA won't let Kaiser release her full medical records, we won't know for sure. But enjoy her why you can, I guess. And throw her away when you are done with her.

Where does bigotry come into this? Have I said anything about people shouldn’t be allowed to get sex change surgery? No…I said KIDS shouldn’t be able to do it because there are too many unknowns, and they themselves may not even know, but you’re perfectly fine putting a 6 year old on puberty blockers, when they are still developing both mentally and physically.

Six year olds are probably too young. But again, I'm not a doctor. Neither are you. Neither is that Mormon Freak who has been stalking me all day.

Ok joe, so if your idea is that because she really wanted it that means it’s ok, then we should let 13 year olds drink, and smoke, get tattoos, go to bars, I mean if they really want it, they should be able to make those decisions for themselves, right? If it’s laws that are getting in the way of those things, then we should abolish those laws, because if a teen has the capacity to make choices that can alter their body and mind, then they should be able to make other life decisions for themselves too, right?
Funny you should mention smoking, because Big Tobacco was SPECIFICALLY marketing their products to 13 year olds for decades (and they are doing the same with vaping now). Yet when liberals try to put a stop to it, Republicans went to the mattresses for years.
 
Natural selection will do its thing, and your side is exactly the sort of detritus that natural selection functions to clear away.
Funny, the Slave Owner and the racist said the same kind of thing 150 years ago. Darwin even predicted the extinction of black people in "Descent of Man".

I call bullshit.

There is not, and never was, any reason, in accordance to any understanding of natural selection, to expect that black people would go extinct, as long as they continued to breed.

On the other hand, trannies and faggots effectively remove themselves from the gene pool. Breeding requires proper application of the difference between male and female, and those who do not make that application, and especially those who have their reproductive systems mutilated, effectively sterilizing themselves, forfeit the ability to pass their genetic detritus on to future generations.

The future belongs not to sexually-defectives freaks that remove themselves from the gene pool, but to normal people, who continue to produce offspring. That is how it has always been, and that is how it always will be.

The current fad of denying the proper relationship between the sexes of denying even the biological distinction itself between sexes, is a fad that cannot persist, that will fall away as natural selection cleans up the mess that is producing this fad.
 
Living in Mormon Bob's head. Holy shit, he's been ranting about me all afternoon!

If you can't discuss the issue honestly, not sure why there's a point talking to you...


Again, Bob, tell me which one of these used to be a man.

transgender-beauty-pageant-women.jpg




Funny, the Slave Owner and the racist said the same kind of thing 150 years ago. Darwin even predicted the extinction of black people in "Descent of Man".

The girlfriend and I went to the Field Museum this week. (I mention this because you seem to obsess on such matters). one of the things we saw were the Hoffman Statues, that purported to show the superiority of white people. (They were commissioned in the 1930s). Now the museum shows those statues, but with a long video explaining why the racist attitudes behind their commissioning was wrong.

Sixty years ago, it was illegal to marry outside your race in this country.

Fifty years ago, homosexuality was listed as being a mental illness. Now gays can get married.

Progress marches on, always to be more inclusive, not less.



No one is going after children. I suspect that if you talked to a group of young people outside your cult, most of them would be straight, but they'd still be horrified by your phobias.

That was quite the usual sidestep. I was inquiring why a convicted child molester would be allowed to read to children at a Tranny Story Time. You seem unconcerned about that.

It seems leftist groomers have this need to present obese men in outlandish styles of makeup and womens clothes as role models for behavior, models of behavior that the groomers want children to emulate. A part of childhood development involves learneds behaviors and values of their peers and role models. That’s why leftist groomers focus on young, impressionable children.

There was a published study connected to "Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria" conducted at Brown University Parent reports of adolescents and young adults perceived to show signs of a rapid onset of gender dysphoria Curiously, the university pulled it down because of a “Rapid Onset” of leftist “Groomer Rage Syndrome”. The study shows that increasingly, parents are reporting post-pubescent children (not the doped children) who suddenly decide they're trans "in the context of belonging to a peer group where one, multiple, or even all of the friends have become gender dysphoric and transgender-identified during the same timeframe."


No wonder leftist groomers want every chance they can get to coerce the youngest children. The younger the better, eh? Groomer manipulation is more effective in the youngest, most impressionable children.
 
No one is going after children.
No one is going after children. teaching kids not to be bigots is not going after them.

It is happening out in the open, for everyone to see. Denying it serves no purpose at all, other than to show everyone what a lying piece of shit you are; but even that is no purpose, since everyone who ahs ever interacted with you already knows.
 
Again, Bob, tell me which one of these used to be a man.

transgender-beauty-pageant-women.jpg
immediately apparent to me.

Let me guess, you want an alibi for various “encounters” you have had.

BTW, for those of us who actually can define what a woman is, there’s no such thing as “used to be a….”
 
Back
Top Bottom