Reciprocal force is different than initiation....Do you really need that spelled out?
Tax Man did not initiate force. He attempted to justify its use against a rival ideological belief. The same as you.
He approved and applauded the use of proactive aggression...I approve of and applaud reciprocal defensive force against said aggressors...If the difference needs to be spelled out to you, I don't know what to say.
There is no difference. You are both approving and applauding vigilante justice.
There is nothing more you can say.
Wow, no wonder you have the philosophy that you do.
You need to study anthropology and basic human nature.
If you can't see the difference, it is understandable where you get your views.
How is Antifa "bringing justice," against Tucker's right to free speech by initiating violence?
That's f**ed up.
How is Antifa "bringing justice," against Tucker's right to free speech by initiating violence?
I don't understand this being directed at me. Why is bringing justice in quotes? I thought it was clear what I thought of ANTIFA's intimidation tactics.
Something else I don't understand is anarchists calling for a ******* dictator to solve their problems using violent means.
Tax Man said that ANTIFA was justified in its intimidation tactics for the things Carlson said. To which, Oddball took exception and called for violence against Tax Man for what he said.
What the **** is the difference?
Oh, my sincere apologies.
I did not take the exchange that way.
It was my understanding that you were equating that the actions of Antifa, as the same as those who took up arms in reaction to Antifa.
I did not think Oddball was calling for violence against Taxman. Oddball's way is to be trolling and sardonic to the terminally stupid. No one seriously supports right wing fascist/light dictators, it is just a way to be funny. The frustration with folks and the Che' t-shirts and their like? Seriously?
People are just sick of the double standards. I had to call out an anarcho friend of mine who would seriously spout the voluntarism creedo and then support Pinochet? WTF?!
And then these Antifa supporters get all offended when folks joke about the necessity of using Pinochet tactics to root out corruption that has
the masses hopelessly brainwashed against their own interests?
OTH, folks should not be so willfully blind as to ignore Pinochet's connections with the same folks that orchestrate the monsters on the left.
I think we have misunderstanding. My apologies.
I thought you were implying that antifa was doing justice.
Who produced demonstrably better results with far fewer crimes against humanity? Are we such slaves to the global corporate banking cabal and their transparent agenda?
In the end, they will create the conditions for a global corporate police state, fascism is fascism, from the left or the right. The King doesn't care what you call it.