Leftist Extremist Socialist Democrat Governance Insanity: California City BANS SITTING IN PUBLIC...No Kidding

[Muhammed]

That is some serious moonbattery right there.

 

[MisterBeale]

So does the Fascist Wing support the mandatory spread of the New Virus in these affluent areas or what?

Tell the class what these rules have to do with the spread of this virus. . . .

. . . you seem to have some insight the rest of us lack. . . .

It's a temp order Community News and Updates | City of Manhattan Beach from the elected official. Not extreme socialism, just doing what they think is best for public safety.

It's a moronic order lapped up by morons like you.

Useless or moronic, doesn't make it extreme socialism. That would be confiscating all those nice homes and properties and redistributing them to the homeless masses wouldn't it? Not removing public chairs and asking people to limit their public exposure.

Fine. . . let's not call it "socialism," or "fascism," or "communism."

Let's be precise in our language, shall we?

Especially in California, and now, it seems with the nation at large. . . we are entering a new era, where local government, and the nation at large, must submit to the World Economic Forum, the WHO, and the agenda of the UN.

It is Authoritarian, and the people have no choice in the matter. We listen to the establishment experts, or no experts at all regarding; the media, the economy, science, and now, apparently, elections too. . .

It is a gas-lit world, ain't it?

Authoritarianism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

". . . In an influential 1964 work,[4] the political scientist Juan Linz defined authoritarianism as possessing four qualities:

1. Limited political pluralism, realized with constraints on the legislature, political parties and interest groups.
2. Political legitimacy based upon appeals to emotion and identification of the regime as a necessary evil to combat "easily recognizable societal problems, such as underdevelopment or insurgency".
3. Minimal political mobilization and suppression of anti-regime activities.
4. Ill-defined executive powers, often vague and shifting, which extends the power of the executive.[5][6]

Minimally defined, an authoritarian government lacks free and competitive direct elections to legislatures, free and competitive direct or indirect elections for executives, or both.[7] Broadly defined, authoritarian states include countries that lack the civil liberties such as freedom of religion, or countries in which the government and the opposition do not alternate in power at least once following free elections.[8] Authoritarian states might contain nominally democratic institutions such as political parties, legislatures and elections which are managed to entrench authoritarian rule and can feature fraudulent, non-competitive elections.[9]. . . "

 

[martybegan]

So does the Fascist Wing support the mandatory spread of the New Virus in these affluent areas or what?

Tell the class what these rules have to do with the spread of this virus. . . .

. . . you seem to have some insight the rest of us lack. . . .

It's a temp order Community News and Updates | City of Manhattan Beach from the elected official. Not extreme socialism, just doing what they think is best for public safety.

It's a moronic order lapped up by morons like you.

Useless or moronic, doesn't make it extreme socialism. That would be confiscating all those nice homes and properties and redistributing them to the homeless masses wouldn't it? Not removing public chairs and asking people to limit their public exposure.

It makes it repressive useless government nannyism, the retarded younger sibling of socialism/communism.

 

[MisterBeale]

Please someone explain the science behind this.

I'll explain the science. . .

It is easier to flee from authoritarians on bike than it is on foot. . .

 

[surada]

"No, that wasn’t a typo in the title suggesting that the city has banned public defecation. (They wouldn’t do that anyway. California doesn’t enforce “quality of life crimes.”) Manhattan Beach, a suburb of Los Angeles is beginning the process of removing all of the chairs, benches and tables from public property. Yes, Manhattan Beach has banned “sitting in public” as of today. The seating facilities will remain in storage “until further notice.” As if you needed me to tell you, this is ostensibly being done to combat the spread of the dreaded novel coronavirus."

WTF?!

Mandated 6-foot distancing and mask-wearing is not enough for Marxist liberals who want to control every aspect of your life. No, now they are mandating American citizens can not SIT in public...even alone on a park bench.

The Mayor has ordered all public seating (chairs, benches, etc...) be removed and stored. That means the city will have to pay a work crew to dig up / pick up all the benches and seats - no social distancing here. The city will have to find / rent storage locations for all of those confiscated seats and benches...not to mention the Marxist micro-managing nanny state forced compliance with an insane edict.

Holy shit...welcome to Amerika under Marxist Democrat rule....

CA city bans sitting in public. Seriously

hotair.com

.

Chill out. Its temporary. My club removed all the sofas and tables for Bridge, Chess and MahJong. Time to grow up.

 

[Dragonlady]

In reality you can now sit wherever you want.

They can't sit on a tax payer-funded/purchased park bench.....

Where in the Constitution does it say that the government has to provide park benches?

Remember the part where you didn't want money going to blue states or democratically run cities? Well this is what happens. No city workers to maintain city amenities because all of the resources and tax dollars are going to covid.

Right now, vaccine is sitting in freezers throughout the country because the states have no money to hire people to get it into arms. Because Trump politicized money to the blue states.

Everything Donald Trump touches dies. That includes the United States of America.

 

[BluesLegend]

So when I say Democrats are CONTROL FREAKS now you know I wasn't understating that.

 

[jasonnfree]

Trump bots always worried about California. You'd think they'd be doing something useful like looking for a job or figuring out how to hide Trump when he soon becomes a man on the run. In the meantime, real estate prices at all time highs in Cali.

 

[martybegan]

Please someone explain the science behind this.

I'll explain the science. . .

It is easier to flee from authoritarians on bike than it is on foot. . .

I honestly want to know the reasoning behind this.
Is it because bikers breathe more? do they think the turbulence caused by someone on a bike spreads the aerosols quicker? Do they think too many bikers use the path, and thus by limiting to walkers they limit the use of the trail?

what about joggers?

 

[Dragonlady]

Please someone explain the science behind this.

As a cyclist, you can't have people walking and cycling on the same trails, unless it's a very wide trail and clearly marked one side for bicycles. You're just asking for accidents to happen. This particular trail isn't very wide at all. You can't even have two bikes going side by side or passing safely.

 

[BlindBoo]

So does the Fascist Wing support the mandatory spread of the New Virus in these affluent areas or what?

Tell the class what these rules have to do with the spread of this virus. . . .

. . . you seem to have some insight the rest of us lack. . . .

It's a temp order Community News and Updates | City of Manhattan Beach from the elected official. Not extreme socialism, just doing what they think is best for public safety.

I don't care what kind of order it is, or who it is by. . .

ANSWER THE DAMN QUESTION.

What do these rules have to do with the spread of this virus?


If you can't, or don't answer it, stop with the snarky ass comments, and leave those who can and do use their critical thinking faculties alone.

Hahaha, the City Managers statement has his reasoning. Does it sound like extreme socialism to you?

 

[martybegan]

Trump bots always worried about California. You'd think they'd be doing something useful like looking for a job or figuring out how to hide Trump when he soon becomes a man on the run. In the meantime, real estate prices at all time highs in Cali.

dodge, duck, dip, dive and dodge.

 

[easyt65]

Chill out. Its temporary. My club removed all the sofas and tables for Bridge, Chess and MahJong. Time to grow up.

You are attempting to compare your 'CLUB' removing sofas and Bridge tables to Marxist edict-issuing, nanny-state politicians declaring sitting in public is banned and ordering the removal of all tax-payer-funded public seats and benches?

Bwuhahahaha...

BTW, according to Marxist Liberal edicts / guidelines your 'Club' should be shut down, members banned from leaving their homes to gather together....

 

[martybegan]

Please someone explain the science behind this.

As a cyclist, you can't have people walking and cycling on the same trails, unless it's a very wide trail and clearly marked one side for bicycles. You're just asking for accidents to happen. This particular trail isn't very wide at all. You can't even have two bikes going side by side or passing safely.

How do you know this isn't a dual use trail to start with? Why remove biking trails and turn them into walking trails? I have a feeling people cycle and walk these trails at the same time all the time.

Again, what is the science for banning cycles but allowing walking?

 

[norwegen]

Well, after they close the churches down, the church folk can put their pews outside for the elderly passers-by and the homeless people.

 

[my2¢]

Leftist Extremist Socialist Democrat Governance Insanity: California City BANS SITTING IN PUBLIC...No Kidding

Now based on past posts I've seen here about San Francisco, it could use such a law if only they'd place an "H" after the "S" in sitting.

 

[martybegan]

So does the Fascist Wing support the mandatory spread of the New Virus in these affluent areas or what?

Tell the class what these rules have to do with the spread of this virus. . . .

. . . you seem to have some insight the rest of us lack. . . .

It's a temp order Community News and Updates | City of Manhattan Beach from the elected official. Not extreme socialism, just doing what they think is best for public safety.

I don't care what kind of order it is, or who it is by. . .

ANSWER THE DAMN QUESTION.

What do these rules have to do with the spread of this virus?


If you can't, or don't answer it, stop with the snarky ass comments, and leave those who can and do use their critical thinking faculties alone.

Hahaha, the City Managers statement has his reasoning. Does it sound like extreme socialism to you?

Reason why he thinks he needs to do it, no information on why it is needed or how doing it will reduce transmission.

Plus someone should sue based on ADA reasons, as people with disabilities are losing places to rest if they are mobility limited.

 

[norwegen]

Where in the Constitution does it say that the government has to provide park benches?

First, this is a city government, not the federal government. Second, the city took money from taxpayers earmarked for public seating, and now the taxpayers are not getting what they paid for.

 

[easyt65]

I honestly want to know the reasoning behind this.
Is it because bikers breathe more? do they think the turbulence caused by someone on a bike spreads the aerosols quicker? Do they think too many bikers use the path, and thus by limiting to walkers they limit the use of the trail? what about joggers?

Everyone knows that cross-country bikers engage in cycling in larger numbers than violent Antifa riots / marches.....proximity of bikers to each other is a threat.

Bikers work up a sweat, and C-19 can be spread by fluid droplets. Sweaty bikers should not be in close proximity to each other. Sweat droplets could fly off a biker and onto others nearby.

Bikers also breathe harder than others, like those walking, and Bikers don't wear masks.

People can walking can see others walking towards them and can move out of the way / social distance appropriately. It is harder for people to get out of the way / social distance from bikers flying towards them / by them.

If you're looking for 'the science' supporting this crap or this ass-clown, there is none. you're being programmed to comply.

 

[martybegan]

I honestly want to know the reasoning behind this.
Is it because bikers breathe more? do they think the turbulence caused by someone on a bike spreads the aerosols quicker? Do they think too many bikers use the path, and thus by limiting to walkers they limit the use of the trail? what about joggers?

Everyone knows that cross-country bikers engage in cycling in larger numbers than violent Antifa riots / marches.....proximity of bikers to each other is a threat.

Bikers work up a sweat, and C-19 can be spread by fluid droplets. Sweaty bikers should not be in close proximity to each other. Sweat droplets could fly off a biker and onto others nearby.

Bikers also breathe harder than others, like those walking, and Bikers don't wear masks.

People can walking can see others walking towards them and can move out of the way / social distance appropriately. It is harder for people to get out of the way / social distance from bikers flying towards them / by them.

If you're looking for 'the science' supporting this crap or this ass-clown, there is none. you're being programmed to comply.

next time end your post with /sarcasm or the SJW types may agree with your "reasoning"