Left-Wingers Enter New Depths of Rage Over Supreme Court's Nationwide Injunction Ruling

Ostrich up!

I guess I'm not among "you guys".
Whatever.

I guess it's a good thing Trump appointed good judges to the SCOTUS to counter people like Jackson and Sotomeyer who seem more bent on ruling based on "feelings" than on the Constitution.

Have a good day!
 
Yes, and SCOTUS will slap him back to reality when a proper case is brought to them.
If there is a proper case to be brought.

Given all the crying on the left, I have to wonder when they will start moving to Cuba to enjoy more freedom?
 
One has to wonder: Certainly they know that, yet they're going balls-out anyway. Completely over the top everywhere.
I dunno. Partisans seem to operate on the delusion that their party has, or will, achieve some kind of final victory, and only the 'good guys' will have access to the increased state power.
 
I dunno. Partisans seem to operate on the delusion that their party has, or will, achieve some kind of final victory, and only the 'good guys' will have access to the increased state power.

What 'power' has this ruling increased?
 
I dunno. Partisans seem to operate on the delusion that their party has, or will, achieve some kind of final victory, and only the 'good guys' will have access to the increased state power.
Well I think that both tribes just assume that if only everybody did things their way, everything would be fantastic and they'd win all elections.

This is the first time, though, that I'm not so sure the party in power isn't planning to stay there by other means.
 
Well I think that both tribes just assume that if only everybody did things their way, everything would be fantastic and they'd win all elections.

This is the first time, though, that I'm not so sure the party in power isn't planning to stay there by other means.
Is it the first time? Dems basically gave up on trying to provide a good candidate for the last election, believing they could prosecute Trump out of contention. That sure seems to qualify as "other means".
 
Yet you can't explain how. Words are easy, all you have are platitudes. :dunno:
I've explained it 'till I turned blue in the face. If I thought you were rational and reasonable, I'd indulge your request. But we both know better.
 
I'm apprehensive about the ruling and see it as a loss for those of us that distrust government by executive order. For those celebrating now, imagine the delight you'll have about the matter when the Democrats gain the office.
 
Is it the first time? Dems basically gave up on trying to provide a good candidate for the last election, believing they could prosecute Trump out of contention. That sure seems to qualify as "other means".
I'm talking about what we were discussing above. They're going so far that they have to know it would be reversed if they lose.

And I believe this is neofascism. Not Trump. He's just the tool. But they already tried fake electors, they've already made voting more difficult in some areas. And they have too much to protect now.

I'm reaching with that, I know. I'd love to be proven completely wrong.
 
15th post
I'm apprehensive about the ruling and see it as a loss for those of us that distrust government by executive order. For those celebrating now, imagine the delight you'll have about the matter when the Democrats gain the office.
Yeah. They just can't see it.
 
As we know, Americans across the political spectrum are very concerned about Trump's clear, aggressive, expanding authoritarian overreach. This includes many conservatives and former Republicans who remain horrified over what has happened to their party.

What does the Orange Cultâ„¢ think of that?

Well, of course, they ignore it. They pretend it doesn't exist. If pressed, they will attack those people, calling them RINOs and/or Deep State and/or Globalists or some combination therein. That's the tactical behavior that has been drummed into them since the day Limbaugh went national.

These are not serious people, but the damage they are causing surely is.

Imagine if both conservative and liberal judges around the nation issued injunctions of every president's policies based on politics. How do you think that would work out? Why should a lone judge, who is way down the hierarchy, be given so much power? The SC made the correct ruling.
 
I'm talking about what we were discussing above. They're going so far that they have to know it would be reversed if they lose.

And I believe this is neofascism. Not Trump. He's just the tool. But they already tried fake electors, they've already made voting more difficult in some areas. And they have too much to protect now.

I'm reaching with that, I know. I'd love to be proven completely wrong.

You're always wrong, so not really much to do here.
 
Back
Top Bottom