Left-Wingers Enter New Depths of Rage Over Supreme Court's Nationwide Injunction Ruling

[kyzr]

No. The 14th Amendment specifically mentions diplomats. It says nothing about illegals because there was no such thing. We need to change the Constitution.

If you replace both words (diplomat & illegal) with "foreigners" which is the intent, neither give birth to citizens.

 

[HikerGuy83]

My question for the Trump administration is how will they enforce this law?

I am not debating the law.

I am focused on the SCOTUS telling regional courts they can't make rules for the entire country.

 

[WEATHER53]

And when their delusion about birthright citizenship goes up in flames, towns go up in flames as they are a lawless and immature bunch

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Absolutely. Anything that block this rule be EO shit is an improvement.

You want judges to have more power than the elected President? That's very fascist of you!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If you replace both words (diplomat & illegal) with "foreigners" which is the intent, neither give birth to citizens.

You can't do that because words have meanings in the real world.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Absolutely. Anything that block this rule be EO shit is an improvement.

OMGosh....thought you were a Libertarian.

Didn't realize you worship at the feet of Chuck Schumer.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I am not debating the law.

I am focused on the SCOTUS telling regional courts they can't make rules for the entire country.

That is a good thing and has little to do with birthright citizenship. His order is unconstitutional IMHO but SCOTUS needs to decide that. I hope they will.

 

[HikerGuy83]

My question for the Trump administration is how will they enforce this law?

In General, I see Trump as shooting in the dark to stir up the pot. Things fall out because the equilibrium shifts to one side or the other.

Given the great SCOTUS we have (well six of them anyway.....and Kagan isn't bad), it generally goes our way.

But some of his ideas are pretty crazy.

I trust they won't be applied, but something that reflects the intent that is more practical.

I'll take that over Biden/Harris/Warren/Schumer/Pelosi/Jeffries/ and all the other left-wing assholes anyday

 

[HikerGuy83]

That is a good thing and has little to do with birthright citizenship.

That is my point.

And I agree he is pushing it with the law.

I expcet it won't result in much.

But the SCOTUS shutting down the 9th Circuit Court.

Worth millions !!!!!!

 

[protectionist]

Single individuals should not be allowed to have more power than the president of the United States. Hell, even the Supreme Court can't use just one judge to be more powerful than the president of the United States. It takes a ruling of nine judges to represent the ultimate power of the Supreme Court. And even the SC itself has only equal power to the president of the United States.

And it's about time. I remember Pat Buchanan writing about judge shopping many years ago.

 

[dblack]

You want judges to have more power than the elected President? That's very fascist of you!

Very funny. The pee wee argument!

 

[dblack]

That is my point.

And I agree he is pushing it with the law.

I expcet it won't result in much.

But the SCOTUS shutting down the 9th Circuit Court.

Worth millions !!!!!!

Why is this a good thing? Will you be cheering when Dem President takes advantage of it??

 

[kyzr]

You can't do that because words have meanings in the real world.

True, but one of the ancient Chief Justices said para. "the Constitution says what we say it says".
Translating "intent" from word meanings back in the 1700s is good work. There were no "illegals" or "anchor babies" back then.

 

[OldFlame]

It was there. I guess you didn't read it.

Ok. So why do you consider this decision a "victory"?

Post number? Because I didn't see it then.

Does it follow the constitution or not? Why do you believe a district judge should hold more power than POTUS?

 

[OldFlame]

Absolutely. Anything that block this rule be EO shit is an improvement.

Then you don't believe in the Constitution, the SC got it right, that's what they're there for, to determine constitutionality.

It's your extreme TDS and bias towards the current admin that is forming your 'opinion'.

 

[OldFlame]

Why is this a good thing? Will you be cheering when Dem President takes advantage of it??

They already can and do because district courts are rarely used against D presidents as proven in the stats I provided earlier. Perhaps if your lovely dimocrats hadn't abused it, it would have never been an issue that needed addressing.

 

[OldFlame]

OMGosh....thought you were a Libertarian.

Didn't realize you worship at the feet of Chuck Schumer.

Who knows what he is, but he has a severe case of TDS, there's nothing Trump could do that he wouldn't call 'fascist'.

 

[AZrailwhale]

It's actually a loss for America. Also, Baron Trump is no longer a citizen.

How many times do you need to be told that is not only a stupid comment but a lie. A person only needs ONE PARENT who is an American citizen for derived citizenship. No one has even tried to make a case that Donald Trump is not an American citizen.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Very funny. The pee wee argument!

Nobody cares about you pee wee if you keep it to youself.

 

[AZrailwhale]

In 2022, Kagan argued the exact opposite of her recent vote....

It just shows that Kagan is an ideologue, not a real, objective judge. She always reacts to whose ox is being gored.