Leader of Cowboy Clown Posse gets 68 years in prison. aka: Gregory Burleson, Arizona militia!

[Baz Ares]

BTW.. These are great for the new Very, Very long term living off the tax payers dimes.
What a weak BS Clown Cowboy ***** man.

Joining a Prison Gang and Dropping the Soap - Don't Do Either In Prison - Prison Talk 1.2



Really this guy talks like our Dear Leader Orange Douche. Well, really way better.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

Who was harmed by his actions?

Essentially a life sentence, raising 8th Amendment questions. I trust his attorneys are appealing.

Did this guy actually fire a weapon at anyone?

Gregory Burleson,

Guess the jury said BS, as they were anti-guns. Guns DO put the right people in JAIL: Where they belong. ENJOY the 50 years of HARD Times with BIG BUBBA! Let's see how the Coward deals with people with guns.

What was his crime? Exercising his 1st and 2nd amendment rights?

Try reading the full report.

“Yes, I was down in the wash. I went down there with the intention to see what was going on,” Burleson said during his sentencing hearing Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Las Vegas.”I did not go down there with the intention of assaulting or killing anyone.”

After the standoff, Burleson, posted incendiary, anti-government messages to his Facebook page.


“I was hell bent on killing federal agents that had turned their back on we the people,” he told an undercover FBI agent who posed as a documentary filmmaker in order to interview him. During the sentencing hearing, Burleson, a Phoenix resident, acknowledged some of his previous errors.

“Yes, I said a lot of crazy things. I’m ashamed of them actually,” he said to U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro. “Looking back at them, it’s like, ‘wow, obviously I shouldn’t drink.’”

How many federal agents did he actually kill you stupid ****? Drunken rants are not a crime.

 

[JimBowie1958]

He was convicted of threatening and assaulting a federal officer, carrying a weapon in a crime of violence, obstruction and traveling across state lines in aid of extortion.

And it is all horse shit.

 

[JimBowie1958]

BTW.. These are great for the new Very, Very long term living off the tax payers dimes.
What a weak BS Clown Cowboy ***** man.

Joining a Prison Gang and Dropping the Soap - Don't Do Either In Prison - Prison Talk 1.2



Really this guy talks like our Dear Leader Orange Douche. Well, really way better.

More bullshit.

Most prisons are not run by rape gangs.

 

[westwall]

You understand that a threat of violence is itself a "violent" act, right?

Not at all. In most cases a threat is a misdemeanor.

No it ain't. The crime is called "Uttering Threats" and is punishable by up to five years in prison.

Uttering Threats
It is a criminal offence for anyone to threaten to...

• kill or cause bodily harm to any person
• damage, destroy or burn property
• kill, poison or injure any person's animal or bird

The maximum penalty for threatening death or bodily harm is five years imprisonment. The maximum penalty for uttering threats to damage property or kill or injure animals is two years.

Public Legal Education Association - Legal Resources

 

[JimBowie1958]

You understand that a threat of violence is itself a "violent" act, right?

Not at all. In most cases a threat is a misdemeanor.

No it ain't. The crime is called "Uttering Threats" and is punishable by up to five years in prison.

Uttering Threats
It is a criminal offence for anyone to threaten to...

• kill or cause bodily harm to any person
• damage, destroy or burn property
• kill, poison or injure any person's animal or bird

The maximum penalty for threatening death or bodily harm is five years imprisonment. The maximum penalty for uttering threats to damage property or kill or injure animals is two years.

Public Legal Education Association - Legal Resources

Technically true, but the vast majority of such threats are not serious and not prosecuted.

And this guy got 68 years with no corresponding violence to show he was serious?

If you cant see the injustice in this sentence you are blind.

 

[WinterBorn]

You understand that a threat of violence is itself a "violent" act, right?

Not at all. In most cases a threat is a misdemeanor.

No it ain't. The crime is called "Uttering Threats" and is punishable by up to five years in prison.

Uttering Threats
It is a criminal offence for anyone to threaten to...

• kill or cause bodily harm to any person
• damage, destroy or burn property
• kill, poison or injure any person's animal or bird

The maximum penalty for threatening death or bodily harm is five years imprisonment. The maximum penalty for uttering threats to damage property or kill or injure animals is two years.

Public Legal Education Association - Legal Resources

Technically true, but the vast majority of such threats are not serious and not prosecuted.

And this guy got 68 years with no corresponding violence to show he was serious?

If you cant see the injustice in this sentence you are blind.

Threatening federal officers is a felony. Being armed while committing a felony gets you extra time. Don't want to go to prison? Don't threaten federal officers while you are carrying a firearm.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

You understand that a threat of violence is itself a "violent" act, right?

Not at all. In most cases a threat is a misdemeanor.

No it ain't. The crime is called "Uttering Threats" and is punishable by up to five years in prison.

Uttering Threats
It is a criminal offence for anyone to threaten to...

• kill or cause bodily harm to any person
• damage, destroy or burn property
• kill, poison or injure any person's animal or bird

The maximum penalty for threatening death or bodily harm is five years imprisonment. The maximum penalty for uttering threats to damage property or kill or injure animals is two years.

Public Legal Education Association - Legal Resources

Technically true, but the vast majority of such threats are not serious and not prosecuted.

And this guy got 68 years with no corresponding violence to show he was serious?

If you cant see the injustice in this sentence you are blind.

Threatening federal officers is a felony. Being armed while committing a felony gets you extra time. Don't want to go to prison? Don't threaten federal officers while you are carrying a firearm.

Average time served for murder - 8 years.

 

[WinterBorn]

You understand that a threat of violence is itself a "violent" act, right?

Not at all. In most cases a threat is a misdemeanor.

No it ain't. The crime is called "Uttering Threats" and is punishable by up to five years in prison.

Uttering Threats
It is a criminal offence for anyone to threaten to...

• kill or cause bodily harm to any person
• damage, destroy or burn property
• kill, poison or injure any person's animal or bird

The maximum penalty for threatening death or bodily harm is five years imprisonment. The maximum penalty for uttering threats to damage property or kill or injure animals is two years.

Public Legal Education Association - Legal Resources

Technically true, but the vast majority of such threats are not serious and not prosecuted.

And this guy got 68 years with no corresponding violence to show he was serious?

If you cant see the injustice in this sentence you are blind.

Threatening federal officers is a felony. Being armed while committing a felony gets you extra time. Don't want to go to prison? Don't threaten federal officers while you are carrying a firearm.

Average time served for murder - 8 years.

Is that the sentence or what they actually serve?

If you are going to compare the two, you have to wait until this guy gets out.

 

[Pete7469]

68 years for threats, on ******* facebook but not actually recorded or spoken toward another human being.

Yet Lois Lerner is free...

For the time being.

 

[Pete7469]

I bet you bed wetters believe this is a victory.

Remember what you assholes did at Waco and Ruby Ridge?

Remember susequent elections?

Keep over playing your hands. Burleson will be PARDONED. That ****** bradly manning will always be a convicted traitor.

 

[WinterBorn]

68 years for threats, on ******* facebook but not actually recorded or spoken toward another human being.

Yet Lois Lerner is free...

For the time being.

There were a number of charges against this guy. He was convicted of assault, threats, extortion, obstruction of justice, and multiple gun charges.

from: Bundy follower gets 68 years for role in armed Nevada standoff
"Gregory Burleson, 53, of Phoenix, was found guilty in April of eight felony counts, including charges of threatening and assaulting federal officers, obstruction of justice, interstate travel in aid of extortion and firearms offenses related to a crime of violence."

 

[theHawk]

This must be "white privilege" at work. White guy is protesting against Feds, gets the book thrown at him.

Other people that have actually committed violent crimes including rape and murder have gotten lesser sentences.

 

[WinterBorn]

I bet you bed wetters believe this is a victory.

Remember what you assholes did at Waco and Ruby Ridge?

Remember susequent elections?

Keep over playing your hands. Burleson will be PARDONED. That ****** bradly manning will always be a convicted traitor.

Subsequent elections? What elections are you talking about?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Not at all. In most cases a threat is a misdemeanor.

No it ain't. The crime is called "Uttering Threats" and is punishable by up to five years in prison.

Uttering Threats
It is a criminal offence for anyone to threaten to...

• kill or cause bodily harm to any person
• damage, destroy or burn property
• kill, poison or injure any person's animal or bird

The maximum penalty for threatening death or bodily harm is five years imprisonment. The maximum penalty for uttering threats to damage property or kill or injure animals is two years.

Public Legal Education Association - Legal Resources

Technically true, but the vast majority of such threats are not serious and not prosecuted.

And this guy got 68 years with no corresponding violence to show he was serious?

If you cant see the injustice in this sentence you are blind.

Threatening federal officers is a felony. Being armed while committing a felony gets you extra time. Don't want to go to prison? Don't threaten federal officers while you are carrying a firearm.

Average time served for murder - 8 years.

Is that the sentence or what they actually serve?

If you are going to compare the two, you have to wait until this guy gets out.

Average time served is generally one-third of the sentence. One-third of 68 is 22 and change. Still excessive.

 

[WinterBorn]

No it ain't. The crime is called "Uttering Threats" and is punishable by up to five years in prison.

Uttering Threats
It is a criminal offence for anyone to threaten to...

• kill or cause bodily harm to any person
• damage, destroy or burn property
• kill, poison or injure any person's animal or bird

The maximum penalty for threatening death or bodily harm is five years imprisonment. The maximum penalty for uttering threats to damage property or kill or injure animals is two years.

Public Legal Education Association - Legal Resources

Technically true, but the vast majority of such threats are not serious and not prosecuted.

And this guy got 68 years with no corresponding violence to show he was serious?

If you cant see the injustice in this sentence you are blind.

Threatening federal officers is a felony. Being armed while committing a felony gets you extra time. Don't want to go to prison? Don't threaten federal officers while you are carrying a firearm.

Average time served for murder - 8 years.

Is that the sentence or what they actually serve?

If you are going to compare the two, you have to wait until this guy gets out.

Average time served is generally one-third of the sentence. One-third of 68 is 22 and change. Still excessive.

Again, we need to make the comparisons accurate. Yes, the 68 years is more than a single murder charge. But he was convicted on numerous federal charges. And his sentence was less than the prosecutor asked for.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Again, we need to make the comparisons accurate. Yes, the 68 years is more than a single murder charge. But he was convicted on numerous federal charges. And his sentence was less than the prosecutor asked for.

In Federali Think, threatening a federal officer while carrying a gun is far worse than the rape and murder of innocent children.

And it doesnt matter if the judge gave the man less time because he wont live to see the end of either what the judge gave him or what the prosecutor asked for.

The government similarly over-reacts to vigilante crimes, even the slightest acts.

They want us to know we are under the boot heel and they will fight to keep it that way, no matter who we elect to office.

 

[WinterBorn]

Again, we need to make the comparisons accurate. Yes, the 68 years is more than a single murder charge. But he was convicted on numerous federal charges. And his sentence was less than the prosecutor asked for.

In Federali Think, threatening a federal officer while carrying a gun is far worse than the rape and murder of innocent children.

And it doesnt matter if the judge gave the man less time because he wont live to see the end of either what the judge gave him or what the prosecutor asked for.

The government similarly over-reacts to vigilante crimes, even the slightest acts.

They want us to know we are under the boot heel and they will fight to keep it that way, no matter who we elect to office.

If you take up arms in resistance to the federal gov't, do you imagine they would be lenient?

If you demand that your cows be able to graze on federal property, despite your refusal to pay the grazing fees, you can expect federal officers to oppose you. This man broke the law. Want to change the laws? Great. Do it. But don't willingly and knowingly break the law and then whine when you are punished.

 

[Vandalshandle]

In my county, one can be charged with "Brandishing a deadly weapon". He certainly did that. Anyway, the crazy sonofabitch is in the slammer, and won't bother anyone again.

 

[JimBowie1958]

If you take up arms in resistance to the federal gov't, do you imagine they would be lenient?

The guy posted the threat on face book, lol, hardly an act of violence or 'taking up arms'. Otherwise he showed up at protests legally carrying weapons we are allowed to carry legally.

You are trying to make it out like someone angry with the government that walks around in a public protest is ipso facto in rebellion against the government.

Nonsense, but the Federalis are trying to create that image in the public mind just like they have with child spanking which is still totally legal except in libtard control cities and states.