Lead Prosecutor in Rittenhouse Political Prosecution Says Rittenhouse Chased His Antifa Attackers. Then He Shows Video Of Antifa Chasing Rittenhouse.

[TemplarKormac]

Moron, the gun charge in Illinois was dropped because there's no evidence he was ever in possession of the gun in Illinois.

So no, there is no precedent and again, the judge in this case in Wisconsin already denied the motion to drop the gun charge.

It's like your brain doesn't function normally.

If he didn't have the gun in Illinois, how can you charge the he intended to take it across state lines to Wisconsin in order to commit premeditated murder?

You're being serious, aren't you?

 

[hadit]

False. If justice means he properly acted in self defense and is not guilty, I hope the jury decides that. As far as the jury, I'm good with either way they return. But the jury hasn't returned a verdict yet and from what I've seen, I believe he's guilty.

I can go with that.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Heck, if you want to play that game, the rioters started it when they decided to go around setting fire to buildings and trashing the place. In the context of this trial, it comes down to whether Rittenhouse had a good reason to fear for his life when he pulled the trigger, and everything we've heard supports that conclusion. He wasn't hiding in the shadows, picking off rioters, he wasn't marching down the street, shooting at a crowd in front of him, he was on the ground, facing people running at him and clearly threatening him. That's what the jury has to consider, not whether he should have been at home.

It takes a special kind of ignorance to argue "he was from out of state" is relevant in a self-defense trial.

 

[TemplarKormac]

because he shot the first guy in the back

That suggests he was running away, does it not?

 

[Meister]

It's more than just wording, you ******* moron.

"Beyond REASONABLE doubt" is far less strict than beyond the shadow of a doubt. Learn the difference.

In your world, Perry. Bottom line, the prosecution blew it in a big way.
They could have used you in their corner,

 

[Muhammed]

If he didn't have the gun in Illinois, how can you charge the he intended to take it across state lines to Wisconsin in order to commit premeditated murder?

You're being serious, aren't you?

Obviously he's simply parroting fake news reports. A lot of fake news outlets were spewing that false narrative. And since he's got a very low IQ, he's very suggestible and stupidly believes disinformation from fake news outlets.

 

[Faun]

If he didn't have the gun in Illinois, how can you charge the he intended to take it across state lines to Wisconsin in order to commit premeditated murder?

You're being serious, aren't you?

When the **** did I say he took the gun to commit premeditated murder? Can you argue with what I actually say and not what you hallucinate I say?

Again, dumbfuck... he was charged in both states separately on a gun charge. The charge in Illinois was dropped when the DA learned the police had no evidence he had possession of the gun in Illinois. He purchased the gun through a friend in Wisconsin, where the charge is still on the table. The two gun charges have nothing to do with each other; and as of now, the jury in this case will still be deciding guilty or not guilty on that gun charge.

There is something seriously wrong with you.

 

[Faun]

That suggests he was running away, does it not?

No, it suggests what I said... he was face down and shot in the back.

 

[Faun]

Obviously he's simply parroting fake news reports. A lot of fake news outlets were spewing that false narrative. And since hre's got a very low IQ, he's very suggestible and stupidly believes disinformation from fake news outlets.

No, moron, I'm posting what I see in videos; not what the news is telling me. So once again you try to insult me but you end up looking like an idiot by getting it all wrong.

 

[iceberg]

Junior Nazi "started the hostilities" when he left his home state looking for someone to shoot.

But all those out there tearing up the city and carrying around guns illegally doesn't bother you

what a **** Jughead.

 

[TemplarKormac]

No, it suggests what I said... he was face down and shot in the back.

View attachment 562573

What footage shows he was face down? A simple knowledge of ballistics will tell you that a bullet shot from the front within sufficient range of the target will easily penetrate the body. That image looks like an exit wound to me.

 

[Faun]

What footage shows he was face down? A simple knowledge of ballistics will tell you that a bullet shot from the front within sufficient range of the target will easily penetrate the body. That image looks like an exit wound to me.

LOLOL

That only serves to further demonstrate how ignorant of this case you are.

Dr. Kelley of the Milwaukee Medical Examiner’s Office conducted an autopsy on Joseph Rosenbaum. Dr. Kelley indicated that Rosenbaum had a gunshot wound to the right groin which fractured his pelvis, a gunshot wound to the back which perforated his right lung and liver, a gunshot wound to the left hand, a superficial gunshot wound to his lateral left thigh, and a graze gunshot wound to the right side of his forehead.​

 

[TemplarKormac]

LOLOL

That only serves to further demonstrate how ignorant of this case you are.

Dr. Kelley of the Milwaukee Medical Examiner’s Office conducted an autopsy on Joseph Rosenbaum. Dr. Kelley indicated that Rosenbaum had a gunshot wound to the right groin which fractured his pelvis, a gunshot wound to the back which perforated his right lung and liver, a gunshot wound to the left hand, a superficial gunshot wound to his lateral left thigh, and a graze gunshot wound to the right side of his forehead.​

Where is the footage of Rosenbaum being face down?

Why isn't the prosecution making this case right now? You are now suggesting that Rittenhouse executed the man. That is not supported by any of the video evidence.

So your point remains invalid.

 

[Faun]

Where is the footage of Rosenbaum being face down?

Why isn't the prosecution making this case right now? You are now suggesting that Rittenhouse executed the man. That is not supported by any of the video evidence.

So your point remains invalid.

They made it already, moron. You must have missed it.

And I showed you the visual evidence...

You're simply just in denial mode.

 

[TemplarKormac]

LOLOL

That only serves to further demonstrate how ignorant of this case you are.

Dr. Kelley of the Milwaukee Medical Examiner’s Office conducted an autopsy on Joseph Rosenbaum. Dr. Kelley indicated that Rosenbaum had a gunshot wound to the right groin which fractured his pelvis, a gunshot wound to the back which perforated his right lung and liver, a gunshot wound to the left hand, a superficial gunshot wound to his lateral left thigh, and a graze gunshot wound to the right side of his forehead.​

"During cross-examination, Rittenhouse's attorney, Mark Richards, asked Kelley if Rosenbaum's hand was over the barrel of Rittenhouse's AR-15-stayle riffle when he was first shot.

Kelley said that "makes sense."

Kelley also confirmed Rosenbaum was falling forward, not walking away, when he was shot in the back by Rittenhouse — an important detail as the defense tries to prove Rittenhouse was not chasing Rosenbaum or that Rittenhouse was not shooting as Rosenbaum was fleeing."

Medical examiner gives graphic testimony on injuries that killed Rittenhouse shooting victims

The medical examiner who performed autopsies on the two men shot and killed by Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha testified Tuesday in Rittenhouse's murder trial, detailing their fatal injuries for jurors.

www.wpr.org

 

[TemplarKormac]

They made it already, moron. You must have missed it.

And I showed you the visual evidence...

View attachment 562585

You're simply just in denial mode.

Actually, you are. You're the one wanting him lynched. The evidence doesn't back your claim he murdered Rosenbaum. Sorry. Not even the forensics expert agrees with your assumption.

 

[Faun]

"During cross-examination, Rittenhouse's attorney, Mark Richards, asked Kelley if Rosenbaum's hand was over the barrel of Rittenhouse's AR-15-stayle riffle when he was first shot.

Kelley said that "makes sense."

Kelley also confirmed Rosenbaum was falling forward, not walking away, when he was shot in the back by Rittenhouse — an important detail as the defense tries to prove Rittenhouse was not chasing Rosenbaum or that Rittenhouse was not shooting as Rosenbaum was fleeing."

Medical examiner gives graphic testimony on injuries that killed Rittenhouse shooting victims

The medical examiner who performed autopsies on the two men shot and killed by Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha testified Tuesday in Rittenhouse's murder trial, detailing their fatal injuries for jurors.

www.wpr.org

LOLOL

Thanks for proving he was shot in the back, as I said. And proving yourself wrong for ridiculously claiming it was an exit wound.

 

[M14 Shooter]

But all those out there tearing up the city and carrying around guns illegally doesn't bother you

Well, no - he's on their side.

 

[TemplarKormac]

LOLOL

Thanks for proving he was shot in the back, as I said. And proving yourself wrong for ridiculously claiming it was an exit wound.

You said he was face down when he was shot in the back, moron. That only proves you're the one lying. You're twisting the facts.

 

[Faun]

You said he was face down when he was shot in the back, moron. That only proves you're the one lying. You're twisting the facts.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, that medical examiner acknowledged Rosenbaum was "horizontal" when he was shot in the back. Rittenhouse was shooting down at him. Aside from your bullshit claim that was an exit wound, in what direction other than face down do you imagine Rosenbaum, who had already begun falling forward at or before the first shot, could have been facing?