danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #81
Only because you seem to have nothing but fallacy to support yours. All you need is a valid argument and to resort to the fewest fallacies.You've already made it plain that the only arguments you'll accept are those that support your own views.All you need is a valid argument to prove it. It is not you.One of us is right.Thanks. I think you have nothing but right wing fantasy, in that case.I have no obligation to validate your fantasies. And I don't care if you agree or disagree.I agree to disagree; unless you agree that right wingers are the same or worse.It's not. It's about covering for the Democrat. Always has been.It could be about the difference in rhetoric and policies.Uh huh. How many news organizations who were outraged at Trump's facilities for illegal immigrant children have criticized Biden for the same thing?You miss the point. It is about not taking practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy seriously.If you disagree with them, why are you too calling for a theocracy?Why does the "moral majority" want to be taken seriously?Are you calling for a theocracy? We don't do that in America.Job 34:30 applies especially since we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.View attachment 462698They should be asking right wing news organizations why they have no problem with false witness bearing or the practice of the abomination of hypocrisy.
Censorship has less to do with our First Amendment.
Hint: None.
It's not you.