Lawmakers ask Big Cable why they let companies like Newsmax and OAN spread disinformation.

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
65,666
Reaction score
3,385
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
They should be asking right wing news organizations why they have no problem with false witness bearing or the practice of the abomination of hypocrisy.

Censorship has less to do with our First Amendment.
 

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
64,601
Reaction score
15,368
Points
2,180
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.
I don't think that the warnings will be ignored this time.

Some of the same trump people who attacked the capitol in January now want to blow up the capitol and kill as many politicians as possible.

I hope all who are involved in this are found and their plots stopped.

Guilty without evidence eh?
For years, news media have claimed that the first amendment gives them the right to knowingly lie to o their viewers and spread misinformation.



I say that the only thing it does is prevent the government from dictating which stories they cover but that they still have the obligation to cover those stories as unbiased as possible. And that any intentional misinformation should be illegal especially if it causes harm to the public health such as conservative news the lying about covid
So, you want to make it illegal to say anything other than the Official Government Propaganda (that has repeatedly contradicted itself).

Freedom of speech doesn't mean a damn thing to leftists.

No I think news media should be prohibited from lying in order to promote particular political or social agenda. All news media should be required to report stories as truthfully as possible. And any intentional line or misinformation should be illegal.

The fact that conservative think that requiring their news media to report the truth is propaganda is very bad for this country and the Republican party in general. If the truth makes your side look bad and you are on the wrong side
You believe your views should be mandated by threat of government violence.

Leftists hate freedom of speech and want it destroyed.

If you thought you were arguing against that point, you did nothing but prove it correct.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
65,666
Reaction score
3,385
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
64,601
Reaction score
15,368
Points
2,180
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
65,666
Reaction score
3,385
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
They should be asking right wing news organizations why they have no problem with false witness bearing or the practice of the abomination of hypocrisy.

Censorship has less to do with our First Amendment.
View attachment 462698
Job 34:30 applies especially since we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.
Are you calling for a theocracy? We don't do that in America.
Why does the "moral majority" want to be taken seriously?
 

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
64,601
Reaction score
15,368
Points
2,180
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.
They should be asking right wing news organizations why they have no problem with false witness bearing or the practice of the abomination of hypocrisy.

Censorship has less to do with our First Amendment.
View attachment 462698
Job 34:30 applies especially since we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.
Are you calling for a theocracy? We don't do that in America.
Why does the "moral majority" want to be taken seriously?
If you disagree with them, why are you too calling for a theocracy?
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
65,666
Reaction score
3,385
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
They should be asking right wing news organizations why they have no problem with false witness bearing or the practice of the abomination of hypocrisy.

Censorship has less to do with our First Amendment.
View attachment 462698
Job 34:30 applies especially since we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.
Are you calling for a theocracy? We don't do that in America.
Why does the "moral majority" want to be taken seriously?
If you disagree with them, why are you too calling for a theocracy?
You miss the point. It is about not taking practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy seriously.
 

Ringtone

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2019
Messages
2,994
Reaction score
893
Points
140

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
64,601
Reaction score
15,368
Points
2,180
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.
They should be asking right wing news organizations why they have no problem with false witness bearing or the practice of the abomination of hypocrisy.

Censorship has less to do with our First Amendment.
View attachment 462698
Job 34:30 applies especially since we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.
Are you calling for a theocracy? We don't do that in America.
Why does the "moral majority" want to be taken seriously?
If you disagree with them, why are you too calling for a theocracy?
You miss the point. It is about not taking practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy seriously.
Uh huh. How many news organizations who were outraged at Trump's facilities for illegal immigrant children have criticized Biden for the same thing?

Hint: None.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
65,666
Reaction score
3,385
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
They should be asking right wing news organizations why they have no problem with false witness bearing or the practice of the abomination of hypocrisy.

Censorship has less to do with our First Amendment.
View attachment 462698
Job 34:30 applies especially since we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.
Are you calling for a theocracy? We don't do that in America.
Why does the "moral majority" want to be taken seriously?
If you disagree with them, why are you too calling for a theocracy?
You miss the point. It is about not taking practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy seriously.
Uh huh. How many news organizations who were outraged at Trump's facilities for illegal immigrant children have criticized Biden for the same thing?

Hint: None.
It could be about the difference in rhetoric and policies.
 

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
64,601
Reaction score
15,368
Points
2,180
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.
They should be asking right wing news organizations why they have no problem with false witness bearing or the practice of the abomination of hypocrisy.

Censorship has less to do with our First Amendment.
View attachment 462698
Job 34:30 applies especially since we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.
Are you calling for a theocracy? We don't do that in America.
Why does the "moral majority" want to be taken seriously?
If you disagree with them, why are you too calling for a theocracy?
You miss the point. It is about not taking practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy seriously.
Uh huh. How many news organizations who were outraged at Trump's facilities for illegal immigrant children have criticized Biden for the same thing?

Hint: None.
It could be about the difference in rhetoric and policies.
It's not. It's about covering for the Democrat. Always has been.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
65,666
Reaction score
3,385
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
They should be asking right wing news organizations why they have no problem with false witness bearing or the practice of the abomination of hypocrisy.

Censorship has less to do with our First Amendment.
View attachment 462698
Job 34:30 applies especially since we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.
Are you calling for a theocracy? We don't do that in America.
Why does the "moral majority" want to be taken seriously?
If you disagree with them, why are you too calling for a theocracy?
You miss the point. It is about not taking practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy seriously.
Uh huh. How many news organizations who were outraged at Trump's facilities for illegal immigrant children have criticized Biden for the same thing?

Hint: None.
It could be about the difference in rhetoric and policies.
It's not. It's about covering for the Democrat. Always has been.
I agree to disagree; unless you agree that right wingers are the same or worse.
 

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
64,601
Reaction score
15,368
Points
2,180
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.
They should be asking right wing news organizations why they have no problem with false witness bearing or the practice of the abomination of hypocrisy.

Censorship has less to do with our First Amendment.
View attachment 462698
Job 34:30 applies especially since we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.
Are you calling for a theocracy? We don't do that in America.
Why does the "moral majority" want to be taken seriously?
If you disagree with them, why are you too calling for a theocracy?
You miss the point. It is about not taking practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy seriously.
Uh huh. How many news organizations who were outraged at Trump's facilities for illegal immigrant children have criticized Biden for the same thing?

Hint: None.
It could be about the difference in rhetoric and policies.
It's not. It's about covering for the Democrat. Always has been.
I agree to disagree; unless you agree that right wingers are the same or worse.
I have no obligation to validate your fantasies. And I don't care if you agree or disagree.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
65,666
Reaction score
3,385
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
They should be asking right wing news organizations why they have no problem with false witness bearing or the practice of the abomination of hypocrisy.

Censorship has less to do with our First Amendment.
View attachment 462698
Job 34:30 applies especially since we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.
Are you calling for a theocracy? We don't do that in America.
Why does the "moral majority" want to be taken seriously?
If you disagree with them, why are you too calling for a theocracy?
You miss the point. It is about not taking practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy seriously.
Uh huh. How many news organizations who were outraged at Trump's facilities for illegal immigrant children have criticized Biden for the same thing?

Hint: None.
It could be about the difference in rhetoric and policies.
It's not. It's about covering for the Democrat. Always has been.
I agree to disagree; unless you agree that right wingers are the same or worse.
I have no obligation to validate your fantasies. And I don't care if you agree or disagree.
Thanks. I think you have nothing but right wing fantasy, in that case.
 

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
64,601
Reaction score
15,368
Points
2,180
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.
They should be asking right wing news organizations why they have no problem with false witness bearing or the practice of the abomination of hypocrisy.

Censorship has less to do with our First Amendment.
View attachment 462698
Job 34:30 applies especially since we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.
Are you calling for a theocracy? We don't do that in America.
Why does the "moral majority" want to be taken seriously?
If you disagree with them, why are you too calling for a theocracy?
You miss the point. It is about not taking practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy seriously.
Uh huh. How many news organizations who were outraged at Trump's facilities for illegal immigrant children have criticized Biden for the same thing?

Hint: None.
It could be about the difference in rhetoric and policies.
It's not. It's about covering for the Democrat. Always has been.
I agree to disagree; unless you agree that right wingers are the same or worse.
I have no obligation to validate your fantasies. And I don't care if you agree or disagree.
Thanks. I think you have nothing but right wing fantasy, in that case.
One of us is right.

It's not you.
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
119,901
Reaction score
34,608
Points
2,220
If you want to see the deleterious effects of disinformation, look no further than Trump, January 6th, 2021, and forums like this one.

Progressive open embrace their Inner Fascist! What a good little Nazi you are!
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
65,666
Reaction score
3,385
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
They should be asking right wing news organizations why they have no problem with false witness bearing or the practice of the abomination of hypocrisy.

Censorship has less to do with our First Amendment.
View attachment 462698
Job 34:30 applies especially since we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.
Are you calling for a theocracy? We don't do that in America.
Why does the "moral majority" want to be taken seriously?
If you disagree with them, why are you too calling for a theocracy?
You miss the point. It is about not taking practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy seriously.
Uh huh. How many news organizations who were outraged at Trump's facilities for illegal immigrant children have criticized Biden for the same thing?

Hint: None.
It could be about the difference in rhetoric and policies.
It's not. It's about covering for the Democrat. Always has been.
I agree to disagree; unless you agree that right wingers are the same or worse.
I have no obligation to validate your fantasies. And I don't care if you agree or disagree.
Thanks. I think you have nothing but right wing fantasy, in that case.
One of us is right.

It's not you.
All you need is a valid argument to prove it. It is not you.
 

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
64,601
Reaction score
15,368
Points
2,180
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.
They should be asking right wing news organizations why they have no problem with false witness bearing or the practice of the abomination of hypocrisy.

Censorship has less to do with our First Amendment.
View attachment 462698
Job 34:30 applies especially since we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.
Are you calling for a theocracy? We don't do that in America.
Why does the "moral majority" want to be taken seriously?
If you disagree with them, why are you too calling for a theocracy?
You miss the point. It is about not taking practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy seriously.
Uh huh. How many news organizations who were outraged at Trump's facilities for illegal immigrant children have criticized Biden for the same thing?

Hint: None.
It could be about the difference in rhetoric and policies.
It's not. It's about covering for the Democrat. Always has been.
I agree to disagree; unless you agree that right wingers are the same or worse.
I have no obligation to validate your fantasies. And I don't care if you agree or disagree.
Thanks. I think you have nothing but right wing fantasy, in that case.
One of us is right.

It's not you.
All you need is a valid argument to prove it. It is not you.
You've already made it plain that the only arguments you'll accept are those that support your own views.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top