Labour's Sadiq Khan elected mayor of London

[Esmeralda]

Britain is consumed with guilt over having been a colonial power.

Oh, for God's sakes! Totally untrue. I work with British people and have for the past 12 years, day in and day out in an international environment. Whenever this subject comes up, they deny any such thing and say it is in the past and has nothing to do with today. You are making an assumption which is very much incorrect.

Everything indicates that they voted for this guy because they like him, has nothing to do with religion. Nothing.

Oh please. Ask an American if they are consumed with guilt over slavery. They will always say no, but as a nation, we sure the **** are. We can hardly go a day without someone, somewhere bringing it up. The British are the same way. They have this imaginary debt that they feel must be repaid.

They voted for this guy for the same reason white people voted for obungles. Except that underneath it all, England is even more racist than we are. London screwed over minority attorneys so much that an independent examiner was appointed to make a report. The Ousley Report. The SRA an SDT have been screwing over minority attorneys for decades and nothing will ever change. They think they can make it better by voting for this jerk off.

You are making assumptions about a culture of which you know nothing, admit it.

Britain is consumed with guilt over having been a colonial power.

Oh, for God's sakes! Totally untrue. I work with British people and have for the past 12 years, day in and day out in an international environment. Whenever this subject comes up, they deny any such thing and say it is in the past and has nothing to do with today. You are making an assumption which is very much incorrect.

Everything indicates that they voted for this guy because they like him, has nothing to do with religion. Nothing.

Oh please. Ask an American if they are consumed with guilt over slavery. They will always say no, but as a nation, we sure the **** are. We can hardly go a day without someone, somewhere bringing it up. The British are the same way. They have this imaginary debt that they feel must be repaid.

They voted for this guy for the same reason white people voted for obungles. Except that underneath it all, England is even more racist than we are. London screwed over minority attorneys so much that an independent examiner was appointed to make a report. The Ousley Report. The SRA an SDT have been screwing over minority attorneys for decades and nothing will ever change. They think they can make it better by voting for this jerk off.

You are making assumptions about a culture of which you know nothing, admit it.

I work with muslim attorneys IN LONDON every day. Mostly Iranians. I was talking to a couple of them just today. Khan is a solicitor. Of course I know about him.

You live in London do you? LOL

Most politicians all over the world have a background in the law. You are not making any kind of point here.

 

[Esmeralda]

If muslims are 12.4 %, there's no hope for London. It will end with massive murders.

God you are stupid. It's beyond any kind of redemption. You are just totally ignorant and stupid.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

I see the asshole is already being a dick:

London's new Muslim mayor condemns 'Trump-style' attacks

London (AFP) - London's new Muslim mayor Sadiq Khan accused Prime Minister David Cameron on Sunday of using "Donald Trump playbook" tactics to try to divide communities in a bid to prevent his election.

The day after being sworn in with a promise to be "mayor for all Londoners", the Labour lawmaker condemned Cameron's Conservatives for trying to link him to Islamic extremists during the election campaign.

"They used fear and innuendo to try to turn different ethnic and religious groups against each other -- something straight out of the Donald Trump playbook," Khan wrote in The Observer newspaper.

"Londoners deserved better and I hope it's something the Conservative party will never try to repeat."

Khan won 57 percent of the vote in Thursday's mayoral election, securing 1.3 million votes to see off multimillionaire Tory Zac Goldsmith and making history as the first Muslim mayor of a major Western capital.

The 45-year-old, the son of a Pakistani immigrant bus driver, hailed his victory as a triumph of "unity over division" after weeks of Tory criticism over his past appearances at public events alongside radical Muslims.

A number of Conservative politicians criticised the tone of the campaign, but Defence Secretary Michael Fallon said the questions raised had been legitimate.

Khan had admitted representing some "pretty unsavoury characters" during his previous job as a human rights lawyer but said their views were "abhorrent".

"Both candidates were asked questions about their backgrounds, their personalities, their judgment, the people they associate with," Fallon told BBC radio.

"That's the nature of our democracy and the rough-and-tumble of politics."

London's new Muslim mayor condemns 'Trump-style' attacks

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Sadiq Khan apologises after using 'Uncle Tom' racial slur against moderate Muslim groups

 

[tinydancer]

He's a staunch believer in Sharia.

London is owned lock stock and barrel by all things Saudi.

Khan is a British-born of Pakistani descent. Where do the Saudis come in?

Financing Al Muhajiroun.They keep trying to rebrand themselves but if you follow Al M you will understand the terrorist network.

 

[tinydancer]

Kahn is a Fabian socialist. His interest is in destroying the whole of Great Britain and remaking it. Some British people may be so drunk or under the influence that they don't know or don't care.

OMG

You think we don't know you? Who you are or where you post. Kahn is someone we know. I know who Kahn is.

Well, tell us then, since you claim to be such an expert.

What do you know about Sadiq Khan?

A lot.

 

[Mac1958]

Sadiq Khan's voting record in Parliament shows that he has consistently supported women's and gay rights, including repeatedly voting in favor of same-sex marriage. You were saying?

Ya know, come to think of it, you may be right:

Sadiq Khan apologises after using 'Uncle Tom' racial slur against moderate Muslim groups

A Regressive Leftist after your own heart.
.

Do you think you're going to get some prize for reposting the same link, over and over?

I mean, it's clear that you think that link is super mega important, but I think his stated positions and voting record are a little bit more valid than a single off-the-cuff comment he made years ago, and later retracted.

Or does the fact that he's a scary Muslim just trump everything else for you?

I've posted it over and over, because I haven't yet gotten a direct response to it.

Happens all the time. That's how Regressive Leftists are. Avoid the tough stuff and spin for the PC-protected religion.

But congratulations, your transparent attempt at deflection was the first response. Yay!


.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Sadiq Khan's voting record in Parliament shows that he has consistently supported women's and gay rights, including repeatedly voting in favor of same-sex marriage. You were saying?

Ya know, come to think of it, you may be right:

Sadiq Khan apologises after using 'Uncle Tom' racial slur against moderate Muslim groups

A Regressive Leftist after your own heart.
.

Do you think you're going to get some prize for reposting the same link, over and over?

I mean, it's clear that you think that link is super mega important, but I think his stated positions and voting record are a little bit more valid than a single off-the-cuff comment he made years ago, and later retracted.

Or does the fact that he's a scary Muslim just trump everything else for you?

I've posted it over and over, because I haven't yet gotten a direct response to it.

Happens all the time. That's how Regressive Leftists are. Avoid the tough stuff and spin for the PC-protected religion.

But congratulations, your transparent attempt at deflection was the first response. Yay!


.

He said something that he shouldnt have done and apologised for it. If you understood British politics you would know that he was making an important point and he would probably be classed as an "Uncle Tom" for his views.
I am not sure how this one thing outweighs his lifetime of promoting socialist lite principles.

What do you think it means ?

 

[miketx]

As his first act, he will follow in obama's footsteps and remove the statue of Lord Nelson from Trafalgar Square.

Obama removed Lord Nelson from Trafalgar square? What is wrong with you? He did no such thing.

But as far as London electing a Moos-slime mayor, they ain't got nothing on us! We elected a Moos-slime President twice!

 

[Mac1958]

...

Sadiq Khan's voting record in Parliament shows that he has consistently supported women's and gay rights, including repeatedly voting in favor of same-sex marriage. You were saying?

Ya know, come to think of it, you may be right:

Sadiq Khan apologises after using 'Uncle Tom' racial slur against moderate Muslim groups

A Regressive Leftist after your own heart.
.

Do you think you're going to get some prize for reposting the same link, over and over?

I mean, it's clear that you think that link is super mega important, but I think his stated positions and voting record are a little bit more valid than a single off-the-cuff comment he made years ago, and later retracted.

Or does the fact that he's a scary Muslim just trump everything else for you?

I've posted it over and over, because I haven't yet gotten a direct response to it.

Happens all the time. That's how Regressive Leftists are. Avoid the tough stuff and spin for the PC-protected religion.

But congratulations, your transparent attempt at deflection was the first response. Yay!


.

He said something that he shouldnt have done and apologised for it. If you understood British politics you would know that he was making an important point and he would probably be classed as an "Uncle Tom" for his views.
I am not sure how this one thing outweighs his lifetime of promoting socialist lite principles.

What do you think it means ?

Absolutely no way to know.

My curiosity is not about this person, or what he said, it's about the behaviors of those who defend and are so tolerant of one specific religion.

I'm fascinated by this, and just started a thread on it: The Regressive Left and Islam -- What is happening here?
.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

...

Sadiq Khan's voting record in Parliament shows that he has consistently supported women's and gay rights, including repeatedly voting in favor of same-sex marriage. You were saying?

Ya know, come to think of it, you may be right:

Sadiq Khan apologises after using 'Uncle Tom' racial slur against moderate Muslim groups

A Regressive Leftist after your own heart.
.

Do you think you're going to get some prize for reposting the same link, over and over?

I mean, it's clear that you think that link is super mega important, but I think his stated positions and voting record are a little bit more valid than a single off-the-cuff comment he made years ago, and later retracted.

Or does the fact that he's a scary Muslim just trump everything else for you?

I've posted it over and over, because I haven't yet gotten a direct response to it.

Happens all the time. That's how Regressive Leftists are. Avoid the tough stuff and spin for the PC-protected religion.

But congratulations, your transparent attempt at deflection was the first response. Yay!


.

He said something that he shouldnt have done and apologised for it. If you understood British politics you would know that he was making an important point and he would probably be classed as an "Uncle Tom" for his views.
I am not sure how this one thing outweighs his lifetime of promoting socialist lite principles.

What do you think it means ?

Absolutely no way to know.

My curiosity is not about this person, or what he said, it's about the behaviors of those who defend and are so tolerant of one specific religion.

I'm fascinated by this, and just started a thread on it: The Regressive Left and Islam -- What is happening here?
.

So just a dumb fishing expedition then.
It amuses me to see you low information types get so hung up about this.You are 50 years off the pace.

 

[Mac1958]

...

Ya know, come to think of it, you may be right:

Sadiq Khan apologises after using 'Uncle Tom' racial slur against moderate Muslim groups

A Regressive Leftist after your own heart.
.

Do you think you're going to get some prize for reposting the same link, over and over?

I mean, it's clear that you think that link is super mega important, but I think his stated positions and voting record are a little bit more valid than a single off-the-cuff comment he made years ago, and later retracted.

Or does the fact that he's a scary Muslim just trump everything else for you?

I've posted it over and over, because I haven't yet gotten a direct response to it.

Happens all the time. That's how Regressive Leftists are. Avoid the tough stuff and spin for the PC-protected religion.

But congratulations, your transparent attempt at deflection was the first response. Yay!


.

He said something that he shouldnt have done and apologised for it. If you understood British politics you would know that he was making an important point and he would probably be classed as an "Uncle Tom" for his views.
I am not sure how this one thing outweighs his lifetime of promoting socialist lite principles.

What do you think it means ?

Absolutely no way to know.

My curiosity is not about this person, or what he said, it's about the behaviors of those who defend and are so tolerant of one specific religion.

I'm fascinated by this, and just started a thread on it: The Regressive Left and Islam -- What is happening here?
.

So just a dumb fishing expedition then.
It amuses me to see you low information types get so hung up about this.You are 50 years off the pace.

And right to the personal insults, just as I predicted in that thread.

Perfect, thanks. I can always count on you folks.
.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

...

Do you think you're going to get some prize for reposting the same link, over and over?

I mean, it's clear that you think that link is super mega important, but I think his stated positions and voting record are a little bit more valid than a single off-the-cuff comment he made years ago, and later retracted.

Or does the fact that he's a scary Muslim just trump everything else for you?

I've posted it over and over, because I haven't yet gotten a direct response to it.

Happens all the time. That's how Regressive Leftists are. Avoid the tough stuff and spin for the PC-protected religion.

But congratulations, your transparent attempt at deflection was the first response. Yay!


.

He said something that he shouldnt have done and apologised for it. If you understood British politics you would know that he was making an important point and he would probably be classed as an "Uncle Tom" for his views.
I am not sure how this one thing outweighs his lifetime of promoting socialist lite principles.

What do you think it means ?

Absolutely no way to know.

My curiosity is not about this person, or what he said, it's about the behaviors of those who defend and are so tolerant of one specific religion.

I'm fascinated by this, and just started a thread on it: The Regressive Left and Islam -- What is happening here?
.

So just a dumb fishing expedition then.
It amuses me to see you low information types get so hung up about this.You are 50 years off the pace.

And right to the personal insults, just as I predicted in that thread.

Perfect, thanks. I can always count on you folks.
.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Always the victim (part 94)

 

[Mac1958]

...

I've posted it over and over, because I haven't yet gotten a direct response to it.

Happens all the time. That's how Regressive Leftists are. Avoid the tough stuff and spin for the PC-protected religion.

But congratulations, your transparent attempt at deflection was the first response. Yay!


.

He said something that he shouldnt have done and apologised for it. If you understood British politics you would know that he was making an important point and he would probably be classed as an "Uncle Tom" for his views.
I am not sure how this one thing outweighs his lifetime of promoting socialist lite principles.

What do you think it means ?

Absolutely no way to know.

My curiosity is not about this person, or what he said, it's about the behaviors of those who defend and are so tolerant of one specific religion.

I'm fascinated by this, and just started a thread on it: The Regressive Left and Islam -- What is happening here?
.

So just a dumb fishing expedition then.
It amuses me to see you low information types get so hung up about this.You are 50 years off the pace.

And right to the personal insults, just as I predicted in that thread.

Perfect, thanks. I can always count on you folks.
.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Always the victim (part 94)

And again, thanks!
.

 

[ptbw forever]

Currently Muslims make up 2.6 percent of UK's population. Indian Hindus and black people from the Caribbean make up 5.3 percent. ****** still makes up 87 percent.

United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When I was born it was 95% white, and now the rest of Europe has changed so much that 87% is above average for a European country.

Your statistics only confirm the supposed "paranoia" of white nationalists. It is time for white guilt and white liberalism to die.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Currently Muslims make up 2.6 percent of UK's population. Indian Hindus and black people from the Caribbean make up 5.3 percent. ****** still makes up 87 percent.

United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When I was born it was 95% white, and now the rest of Europe has changed so much that 87% is above average for a European country.

Your statistics only confirm the supposed "paranoia" of white nationalists. It is time for white guilt and white liberalism to die.

Why is colour such a big deal for you ?

 

[ptbw forever]

Currently Muslims make up 2.6 percent of UK's population. Indian Hindus and black people from the Caribbean make up 5.3 percent. ****** still makes up 87 percent.

United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When I was born it was 95% white, and now the rest of Europe has changed so much that 87% is above average for a European country.

Your statistics only confirm the supposed "paranoia" of white nationalists. It is time for white guilt and white liberalism to die.

Why is colour such a big deal for you ?

The irony of your ridiculous question....

Non-white advocacy groups whine and whine about things that aren't even serious while government always takes up their cases sooner or later, but the minute white people want to talk about trying to get together to fix the problems in our communities we are treated like we want to re-institute slavery with no consideration to ANYTHING we say. Why are you faux left wing assholes so obsessed with what white people are doing? Why do you all fear us so much that you would blatantly reject and attack our right to speak and assemble?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Currently Muslims make up 2.6 percent of UK's population. Indian Hindus and black people from the Caribbean make up 5.3 percent. ****** still makes up 87 percent.

United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When I was born it was 95% white, and now the rest of Europe has changed so much that 87% is above average for a European country.

Your statistics only confirm the supposed "paranoia" of white nationalists. It is time for white guilt and white liberalism to die.

Why is colour such a big deal for you ?

The irony of your ridiculous question....

Non-white advocacy groups whine and whine about things that aren't even serious while government always takes up their cases sooner or later, but the minute white people want to talk about trying to get together to fix the problems in our communities we are treated like we want to re-institute slavery with no consideration to ANYTHING we say. Why are you faux left wing assholes so obsessed with what white people are doing? Why do you all fear us so much that you would blatantly reject and attack our right to speak and assemble?

I still dont understand why it is such a big deal. It isnt part of my culture thank God. Problems in our community affect everybody in our community and not just oe group or other.

 

[ptbw forever]

Currently Muslims make up 2.6 percent of UK's population. Indian Hindus and black people from the Caribbean make up 5.3 percent. ****** still makes up 87 percent.

United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When I was born it was 95% white, and now the rest of Europe has changed so much that 87% is above average for a European country.

Your statistics only confirm the supposed "paranoia" of white nationalists. It is time for white guilt and white liberalism to die.

Why is colour such a big deal for you ?

The irony of your ridiculous question....

Non-white advocacy groups whine and whine about things that aren't even serious while government always takes up their cases sooner or later, but the minute white people want to talk about trying to get together to fix the problems in our communities we are treated like we want to re-institute slavery with no consideration to ANYTHING we say. Why are you faux left wing assholes so obsessed with what white people are doing? Why do you all fear us so much that you would blatantly reject and attack our right to speak and assemble?

I still dont understand why it is such a big deal. It isnt part of my culture thank God. Problems in our community affect everybody in our community and not just oe group or other.

You must not be white then.

When you are a shrinking, aging global minority that is constantly being lectured about your "privilege" you either bend over and take it like a good little *****, or you fight anything and everything that dares to mention those nonexistent "privileges" to the last like every other race already does.

 

[ZackB]

I hope they frisk that ************ every morning!