LA City Council bans N-word at public meetings, triggering legal threats

[Superbadbrutha]

Black people?

Tell me the time when black folks were raping, maiming, brutalzing, beating and lynching whites. Please enlighten us all.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Tell me the time when black folks were raping, maiming, brutalzing, beating and lynching whites. Please enlighten us all.

I didn't say white people were angels. I am just saying that if you compare the races, black people are generally more violent than white people. Honestly I don't know how you can argue against this.

 

[Meathead]

Tell me the time when black folks were raping, maiming, brutalzing, beating and lynching whites. Please enlighten us all.

Besides lynching, the rest are pretty much daily crimes.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

I didn't say white people were angels. I am just saying that if you compare the races, black people are generally more violent than white people. Honestly I don't know how you can argue against this.

Based on what? Your weak ass opinion. You wiped out whole towns of black folks, history shows who has been the most violent and still is.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Besides lynching, the rest are pretty much daily crimes.

Yea, you don't have to do it anymore the police do it for you.

 

[Meathead]

Yea, you don't have to do it anymore the police do it for you.

You think cops are violating black women? Disgusting! They are not blind ffs.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Based on what? Your weak ass opinion. You wiped out whole towns of black folks, history shows who has been the most violent and still is.

First of all, I am not white (I wish though), Secondly, white people are better at killing, but that does not mean that they are more violent.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

Of course they can, Free Speech is not an unlimited right. They can arrest assholes for disturbing the peace, or just throw the bums out of the meeting

..

Bill Maher has built his whole career on calling white people crackers and you liberals cheer that.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

Tell me the time when black folks were raping, maiming, brutalzing, beating and lynching whites. Please enlighten us all.

Been going on for 50 years. Black on white violence is far more common than white on black. But both pale to black on black violence.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

First of all, I am not white (I wish though), Secondly, white people are better at killing, but that does not mean that they are more violent.

I have never wished that, thank God for being a black man.

They aren't better at it, when the Law is on your side it doesn't matter what you are.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Been going on for 50 years. Black on white violence is far more common than white on black. But both pale to black on black violence.

White on black has been going on for over 400yrs. How much concern is there for white on white crime?

 

[OKTexas]

Bill Maher has built his whole career on calling white people crackers and you liberals cheer that.

Damn, you seriously have no clue who I am if you think I'm a commiecrat. ROFLMFAO

.

 

[ThisIsMe]

You've come to that conclusion how?

Just your responses, seem, agitated

 

[ThisIsMe]

Agreed. And if it's a public place, then you just have to deal with whatever is being said because again, no one has a right to not be offended.

Im not disagreeing with you, but when a group of people have a public meeting and they vote to not use certain language, thems the rules, either abide by them, or leave.

 

[ThisIsMe]

If that place is a public place, nobody should have any business forbidding any language.

Should you be able to go into a grade school and start cursing and using foul language in front of the kids?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Is "c*nt" formally banned in those meetings?

I have no idea; you'd have to ask them

 

[MayorQuimby]

Should you be able to go into a grade school and start cursing and using foul language in front of the kids?

I am not sure, and even if you're right, it would have nothing to do with the place being public, but rather, it's because there are kids.

Why do you have such a problem with me saying people shouldn't be able to censor other people's speeches? Why do you want to tell other people what not to say so badly?

 

[drudge X]

Im not disagreeing with you, but when a group of people have a public meeting and they vote to not use certain language, thems the rules, either abide by them, or leave.

I don’t mind this rule but Democrats have a history of making excuse when they violated rules they don’t like. Look at the ************ Padilla as an example. He knew the press session by Noem was not a Q&A session and only by invitation. Mofo barged in without an invitation, disrupting other attendees, and claim racism when Noem refused to acknowledge him. When Democrats said no one is above the law, it’s horse manure.

 

[ThisIsMe]

I am not sure, and even if you're right, it would have nothing to do with the place being public, but rather, it's because there are kids.

Why do you have such a problem with me saying people shouldn't be able to censor other people's speeches? Why do you want to tell other people what not to say so badly?

Well, im just challenging the notion that you have a right to free speech wherever you want. There are limitations, such as what you say in official public meetings, or private settings, or where children are present.

This doesnt mean your free speech is being limited, it just means that there are times and places where you might not be able to say what you want IN that place. You can go elsewhere and say it, but you might be required to follow rules if there is a requirement to implement them.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Well, im just challenging the notion that you have a right to free speech wherever you want.

Technically, I did not say that. I said that people should not be able to have the ability to censor others' speeches that are otherwise lawful.

There are limitations, such as what you say in official public meetings, or private settings, or where children are present.

I see your point but would rather not get into it. My aim here is not to argue about where and when it might be appropriate to limit speech.

This doesnt mean your free speech is being limited, it just means that there are times and places where you might not be able to say what you want IN that place.

Now you are arguing semantics. Any time you cannot say things that you wish to say (provided that they are lawful speeches), your speech IS being limited.

You can go elsewhere and say it, but you might be required to follow rules if there is a requirement to implement them.

Again, I can see how in a private area, say, someone's house, he can have rules about stuff like, you cannot swear in his house, or you cannot use racial slurs in his house...etc, or he kicks you out. However, nobody should be able to have the ability to have such rules in a place that is not privately owned. In other words, a public space.