Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

[iceberg]

How is my reading of the law irrelevant and Angus' misreading of the law relevant? Of the two of us, I'm the one with 30 years of training and experience at reading and writing legal papers. When opining on legals matters in this forum, I have a very good record at predicting which cases will stand and which will be tossed.

Reading and understand the law isn't a matter of residency, it's a matter of training and experience. Angus has his "feeling", I have 3 years of training, and 30 years of experience.

all that training and experience to get it wrong.

if you're worried about who had legal guns, look up the other guys legal status at the time of the shooting.

toot that horn some more.

 

[JohnDB]

Witnesses today except for Grosskreutz (proven a liar by 3 prosecution witnesses to date of material facts) today painted a picture of Kyle being quiet but the rioters trying to desperately escalate the violence. (Including Grosskreutz)

 

[Faun]

I can't do links.

Bullshit. A link is just text. This forum converts it into a hyperlink.

 

[Desperado]

Trial should be over today... If the trial continues it is a total sham

 

[jc456]

Rosenbaum would have been armed had Rittenhouse not shot him. He was trying to take the rifle.

You have a really warped perspective on defense with a firearm. Have you ever had any training?

he's but an instigator.

 

[JohnDB]

Trial should be over today... If the trial continues it is a total sham

Well....the defense has to earn their paychecks...they now get to make a defense...I know that it seems like the prosecution has been proving Kyle's case all along...but it really hasn't been trying. It's the most pathetic excuse for a prosecution to date.

If OJ got off....Kyle is going for malicious prosecution. And likely win all legal fees.

 

[Faun]

Post it.

@1:22:30

 

[Faun]

an 18 year old can't buy a gun, but he can carry one. You don't what the fuck you're talking about.

LOL

Do you even know you’re a massive fucking moron?

Fucking moron, it was illegal for him, at 17, to be in "possession" of it. I'm pretty sure he had to be in possession of it in order to carry it.

Wisconsin Legislature: 948.60

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

(2) (a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.​

There are exceptions but none of them applied to Rittenhouse. They include being in possession of a firearm while hunting, target practice or other course of instruction, or military service.

Aren't you ever embarrassed over the abject nonsense you post? You should be; I'm embarrassed for you.

 

[Correll]

@1:22:30

Which means nothing.

 

[JohnDB]

@1:22:30

Shows exactly the opposite of what you have claimed...Kyle wasn't aiming his firearm at anyone.

 

[bripat9643]

LOL

Do you even know you’re a massive fucking moron?

Fucking moron, it was illegal for him, at 17, to be in "possession" of it. I'm pretty sure he had to be in possession of it in order to carry it.

Wisconsin Legislature: 948.60

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

​

​

(2) (a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.​

There are exceptions but none of them applied to Rittenhouse. They include being in possession of a firearm while hunting, target practice or other course of instruction, or military service.

Aren't you ever embarrassed over the abject nonsense you post? You should be; I'm embarrassed for you.

In other words, you admit you were wrong.

When I was in high school I had dozens of friends who owned hunting rifles.

 

[Faun]

This is america--you can carry a gun----it is not an excuse for others to attack you. Nothing Kyle did was a threat to anyone else. The demostrators attack people and property---it would be stupid to not be armed if you have to be around the criminals "demostrating".

Yes, this is America. And on America there are laws which can restrict so.e from carrying a gun. Who knows what your point is. I doubt even you know.

 

[bripat9643]

Yes, this is America. And on America there are laws which can restrict so.e from carrying a gun. Who knows what your point is. I doubt even you know.

Not according to the Constitution and they haven't been convicted of a crime.

 

[Faun]

In other words, you admit you were wrong.

When I was in high school I had dozens of friends who owned hunting rifles.

All I could do, fucking moron, is post the law demonstrating it was illegal for Rittenhouse to be in possession of that weapon -- I'm helpless to make you understand it.

 

[bripat9643]

All I could do, fucking moron, is post the law demonstrating it was illegal for Rittenhouse to be in possession of that weapon -- I'm helpless to make you understand it.

The clause "for hunting purposes" is big enough to drive a semi through, dumbass.

 

[Orangecat]

That was yesterday's witness. Today, the surviving shooting victim, who was unarmed, and will have lifelong disabilities, testified that Kyle was behaving like a real asshole with that gun, which is why they were trying to take it away from him before he killed someone.

The actual testimony made you look like a fool, dragoncrotch.

 

[jc456]

Yes the crime does negate self defense.
You can not claim self defense when in commission of a crime.

so why did rosenbaum ambush and chase Rittenhouse? you didn't answer? See the chase itself is the threat. It's why Rittenhouse ran. Why did Rosenbaum chase him, what obligation did Rittenhouse have to appease whatever the fk Rosenbaum was after? Come on dude, don't be a dick your entire life.

 

[jc456]

Thanks for doing my work for me.
This proves that Rittenhouse is unable to use a self defense claim.
Rittenhouse was engaged in an extremely provocative act.

what was his act?

 

[jc456]

So if armed cops frighten me, I can just kill them on sight?

sure, why not, take your consequence.

 

[jc456]

And you support the criminal?

naw Rosenbaum was a pedophile. Why did Rosenbaum ambush and chase Rittenhouse? Pedophile\ing?