Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

[bripat9643]

The prosecution's already shown video of someone accusing Rittenhouse of showing aggression at protesters.

You're wrong as always.

Post it.

 

[Dragonlady]

Well. . . I doubt either of you would make the Jury, especially YOU canuck.



. . . so, in the end, neither of your opinions on the reading of the law is material. We'll just have to wait and see.

How is my reading of the law irrelevant and Angus' misreading of the law relevant? Of the two of us, I'm the one with 30 years of training and experience at reading and writing legal papers. When opining on legals matters in this forum, I have a very good record at predicting which cases will stand and which will be tossed.

Reading and understand the law isn't a matter of residency, it's a matter of training and experience. Angus has his "feeling", I have 3 years of training, and 30 years of experience.

 

[bripat9643]

Once Rittenhouse caused the situation to occur, by bringing the deliberately provocative open carry, then he no longer had any self defense rights.
Legally anyone could have killed him in self defense, at any time.

 

[Faun]

Yeah, he did. Your thugs were armed so it is fully appropriate for him to be armed.

Who said anything about "appropriate," nutcase? I said he didn't have a right. Which he clearly didn't since it was illegal for him to have that gun. He knew that. That's why he had an adult friend get the gun for him.

And where's your link corroborating your claim that federal law prohibits people convicted of misdemeanors from being in possession of a firearm? And where's your link that it's applicable to this case?

You say a lot of shit but you can't seem to back it up.

 

[M14 Shooter]

How is my reading of the law irrelevant and Angus' misreading of the law relevant? Of the two of us, I'm the one with 30 years of training and experience at reading and writing legal papers. When opining on legals matters in this forum, I have a very good record at predicting which cases will stand and which will be tossed.

And yet, you believe Rittenhouse committed murder.

 

[Dragonlady]

only by putting out the fires they set,,

and if you watched todays testimony you would have seen the prosecution witness said kyle never showed any aggression towards the protestors,,

so fuck off you ignorant canadian skank,,

That was yesterday's witness. Today, the surviving shooting victim, who was unarmed, and will have lifelong disabilities, testified that Kyle was behaving like a real asshole with that gun, which is why they were trying to take it away from him before he killed someone.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Once Rittenhouse caused the situation to occur, by bringing the deliberately provocative open carry, then he no longer had any self defense rights.
Legally anyone could have killed him in self defense, at any time.

^^^^
This is a lie.

 

[Dragonlady]

Yeah, he did. Your thugs were armed so it is fully appropriate for him to be armed.

He was carrying an illegal weapon, he was too young to own. That's why it was inappropriate for him to have that gun.

ANYTHING Rittenhouse did with that gun was illegal because having the gun was illegal.

 

[M14 Shooter]

That was yesterday's witness. Today, the surviving shooting victim, who was unarmed, and will have lifelong disabilities, testified that Kyle was behaving like a real asshole with that gun, which is why they were trying to take it away from him before he killed someone.

You don't get to chase after someone with the intent to harm him and then claim self-defense.

 

[M14 Shooter]

He was carrying an illegal weapon, he was too young to own.

The weapon is/was not illegal, and he did not own it.

ANYTHING Rittenhouse did with that gun was illegal because having the gun was illegal.

^^^
This is a lie.

 

[Correll]

What was he going to do, put band-aids on people?

Does not take a lot of training to clean a wound and put on a bandage, yet that can be very helpful. Lifesaving even.


A lack of certification does not mean that his intent was not sincere.

 

[progressive hunter]

That was yesterday's witness. Today, the surviving shooting victim, who was unarmed, and will have lifelong disabilities, testified that Kyle was behaving like a real asshole with that gun, which is why they were trying to take it away from him before he killed someone.

why are you lying,,

todays witness testified kyle made no aggressive acts towards anyone,,,

 

[JWBooth]

Once Rittenhouse caused the situation to occur, by bringing the deliberately provocative open carry, then he no longer had any self defense rights.
Legally anyone could have killed him in self defense, at any time.

How many demonstrations have you ever seen?
Has anyone ever brought a rifle to one?
The answer is no one has ever done this before.
That is because it is inherently illegal to bring an open carry to a demonstration.

As you dont know, hope this helps.

 

[Soupnazi630]

That was yesterday's witness. Today, the surviving shooting victim, who was unarmed, and will have lifelong disabilities, testified that Kyle was behaving like a real asshole with that gun, which is why they were trying to take it away from him before he killed someone.

Ubh WRONG.

The shooting Victim is grosskreutz and he said no such thing. First of all he was armed with a glock pistol which he drew and pointed at Rittenhouse.

He stated that Rittenhouse did not fire until the glock was dfdrawn and pointed at him. This is tetimony proving Rittenhouse fired in self defense.

He also admitted that he spoke to rittenhouse while running beside him and asked him what he was doing Rittenhouse responded he was looking for a cop.

This is not someone trying to disarm someone dangerous.

He has actually been called out by the states on prosecutors for LYING. Not just once but multiple times.

There is no evidence of any provocation by Rittenhouse.

 

[bripat9643]

Who said anything about "appropriate," nutcase? I said he didn't have a right. Which he clearly didn't since it was illegal for him to have that gun. He knew that. That's why he had an adult friend get the gun for him.

And where's your link corroborating your claim that federal law prohibits people convicted of misdemeanors from being in possession of a firearm? And where's your link that it's applicable to this case?

You say a lot of shit but you can't seem to back it up.

an 18 year old can't buy a gun, but he can carry one. You don't what the fuck you're talking about.

 

[Flash]

He was carrying an illegal weapon, he was too young to own. That's why it was inappropriate for him to have that gun.

ANYTHING Rittenhouse did with that gun was illegal because having the gun was illegal.

No Moon Bat. You are confused.

Having the weapon when (maybe) he shouldn't is a misdemeanor. That has absolutely nothing to do with using it for self defense.

One of the shitheads that Kyle shot was also illegally carry a firearm. All three of the shitheads that Kyle shot had criminal backgrounds.

Kyle is a hero. The shitheads he shot were all scumbags that were trying to kill him.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Don't think so.
When provoking such a deadly threat, you do lose the right of self defense.
If he had been like a Korean grocer in LA, staying on private property, and not attempting to talk to people, that would have been ok.

Talking to people? Talking to people now incites others to attack for you to loose your right to self defense. What country are you in? This is america-you are allowed to go where you want out in public.

 

[Faun]

Stupid lefties somehow think Trump is on trial.

It is so fucking bizarre.

You crazy fucks need a mandated TDS vaccine.

Nah, what inexplicable is how you keep saying that but I don't see anyone on the left mentioning Trump in relation to this besides you?

 

[Turtlesoup]

Once Rittenhouse caused the situation to occur, by bringing the deliberately provocative open carry, then he no longer had any self defense rights.
Legally anyone could have killed him in self defense, at any time.

How many demonstrations have you ever seen?
Has anyone ever brought a rifle to one?
The answer is no one has ever done this before.
That is because it is inherently illegal to bring an open carry to a demonstration.

This is america--you can carry a gun----it is not an excuse for others to attack you. Nothing Kyle did was a threat to anyone else. The demostrators attack people and property---it would be stupid to not be armed if you have to be around the criminals "demostrating".

 

[Turtlesoup]

How is my reading of the law irrelevant and Angus' misreading of the law relevant? Of the two of us, I'm the one with 30 years of training and experience at reading and writing legal papers. When opining on legals matters in this forum, I have a very good record at predicting which cases will stand and which will be tossed.

Reading and understand the law isn't a matter of residency, it's a matter of training and experience. Angus has his "feeling", I have 3 years of training, and 30 years of experience.

Experience what? Filing frivolous harassment lawsuits?