Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

[Rigby5]

You know self defense law...........

When the other guy breaks contact......if you then pursue that guy and initiate more violence you are no longer innocent and defending yourself, you have become the bad guy...

Rittenhouse never initiated any violence.......all three of the other guys initiated violence against Rittenhouse who in all 3 attacks was moving away from them....they are the bad guys no matter if Rittenhouse made a bad decision in being there...

Carrying a rifle in a demonstration is extremely violent.
It is an attempt at violent intimidation.

 

[surada]

right. he was simply offering people medical assistance and they came out of nowhere and attacked him.

With his rifle? This kid wasn't qualified to offer medical assistance.

 

[Rigby5]

He didn't bring it into a crowd...he was at the car dealership just standing there....he went to put out a fire.

The car dealership says they had their own people, that Rittenhouse was not there and not wanted there.

 

[ColonelAngus]

I am sure glad we have a legal system with a court of law and a jury and we dont allow some of you ignorant fucks to decide people’s fate based on bullshit.

Some of the posters on here MUST have to look up the recipe for making ice cubes.

 

[Canon Shooter]

What medic have you ever seen carrying a rifle?

A good friend of mine was an Army Combat Medic, and he carried one all the time...

 

[DudleySmith]

Rosenbaum was mentally ill.

He had just left the mental hospital. His fiancé said he wasn't interested in the protest, he just stumbled across it and decided to join.

Rosenbaum threw a baggy at Kyle that held the stuff he had gotten from the mental hospital.

If guns were left at home that night, everyone would've been better off.

lol utter bullshit.

 

[surada]

A good friend of mine was an Army Combat Medic, and he carried one all the time...

This kid was NOT in the military and had no training. He got himself into this mess because he is incredibly stupid.

 

[Coyote]

lol utter bullshit.

No. It is documented. He had just been released from the hospital and they dropped him off there.

 

[Canon Shooter]

New York city where it's illegal to own any weapon, and it's surely necessary for a lot of people.

If you have to break the law to get a gun, then you having that gun is, by definition, an illegally obtained firearm...

 

[Coyote]

This kid was NOT in the military and had no training. He got himself into this mess because he is incredibly stupid.

He was a 17 yr old high school drop out.

 

[Rigby5]

The fact that they violently attacked Rittenhouse who didn't initiate any violence on his own.....let's fucking start with that....

Then, you have the two violent felons...and the 3rd guy who was at the riot.........a riot..he wasn't collecting daisies..

If I had been carrying concealed, (as I have a permit for), and had seen anyone carrying a rifle into a demonstration, I would have immediately shot and killed them.
You just do NOT do that.
No one has ever before carried a rifle into a demonstration, unless they intended to commit murder and deserved to be shot.
That is why beyond what anyone consider reasonable.
The only time one has a right to open carry in demonstration, is if you are clearly defending defined property, like the Korean grocers on their roof tops, during the LA riots.

 

[maybelooking]

I saw the videos of Rosenbaum taunting people. He was just an angry, dick head who was looking for a fight.

He attacked the wrong person.

 

[Canon Shooter]

This kid was NOT in the military and had no training. He got himself into this mess because he is incredibly stupid.

Um, so what?

Rigby 5 said "What medic have you ever seen carrying a rifle?"

I simply replied to his question...

 

[XponentialChaos]

Rittenhouse is going to be found innocent on the serious charges.

 

[2aguy]

That is the case when the "other guy" is not a clear and present danger to everyone, by bringing a rifle to a demonstration.
What do you think would have happened to any of the DC Capital protestors if they had been carrying a rifle?
They would have instantly been shot by the police.

Wrong....Rittenhouse did not initiate any violence of any kind. He was not a danger to anyone.......the first pedophile felon chased him down and cornered him after stating he would kill him and the others......

He did not raise his rifle......he did not point his rifle.....he was moving away from all of them...without raising his rifle at anyone.....he was moving away from all of them...he was not even a tiny bit of a threat to anyone...


They chased him down.....the first pedophile felon cornered him, then tried to grab his rifle....this is what the actual reporter and witness stated in court....and it was also shown on the FBI video, and the street level cell phone video.

 

[2aguy]

Rittenhouse is going to be found innocent of the serious offenses.

One can only hope...

 

[surada]

Rittenhouse is going to be found innocent on the serious charges.

I don't think so.. He should get 20 years at least.

 

[2aguy]

Carrying a rifle in a demonstration is extremely violent.
It is an attempt at violent intimidation.

No...it isn't......chasing down and attacking the guy with the rifle, after saying you would kill him and then lunging for his rifle is extremely violent.

 

[Rigby5]

A good friend of mine was an Army Combat Medic, and he carried one all the time...

No he does not.
If he "carried one all the time", that would mean he carried a rifle with him into restaurants, WalMart, the library, court rooms, airports, in bed at nights, etc.
Army medics in war are different.
They are soldiers first, and medics second.

 

[Canon Shooter]

If I had been carrying concealed, (as I have a permit for), and had seen anyone carrying a rifle into a demonstration, I would have immediately shot and killed them.

You shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a firearm.

Doing what you say you would do would land you in prison, and rightly so...