Kyle Rittenhouse: Teen's homicide trial for Kenosha shootings opens with jury selection

Nah, anyone bringing a rifle to a protest, is trying to intimidate people, and deserves being killed.

Even BLM? So are you gonna pull the trigger on those shitheads?

1640649542689.png


How's about some Antifa fucktards? Which one would you shoot first? The dickhead on the left, the chick, or fatso on the right?

1640649804519.png
 
Last edited:
Wrong.
That is an image of a specific and permitted parade during daylight hours
It is not at all similar to Kyle trying to intimidate demonstrators with his rifle, alone, at night.

Backtracking now, I see. You didn't say anything about the time of day. You said "anyone bringing a rifle to a protest, is trying to intimidate people, and deserves being killed."

Personally, I'd go from left to right: The dickhead on the left, followed by the bitch in the middle, then fatso on the right.
 
Wrong.
What Grosskreutz meant and can easily be seen in the video, is that at first he pointed his pistol, but they raised it to the air.
The pistol was NOT at all aimed any where near to Kyle when Kyle pulled the trigger.


Yes....we keep playing the video of grosscrud, in court,under oath, stating he wasn't shot until he pointed the gun at kyle...but you keep up with the lie........
 
Junior was SO full of it with this performance...and the judge seems a bit of a tool to buy into it. I tell you one thing, if this little POS doesn't do some real time in jail, this is going to set a nasty precedent in this country for both sides of the political/social fence.
This is what stupid looks like in person.
 
Wrong.
If he had specific property to defend, then he would never have approached these 3 people he shot.
You don't "help people" by carrying a rifle with a 30 shot magazine.


He didn't approach them, he went out to put out a dumpster fire they pushed against gas pumps, and was heading away from then when they began chasing him......
 
He did not approach them. THey attacked him.

Wrong.
You can see in the video that Kyle is not staying on any property and defending it, but is walking from group to group.
The only possible reason being to show off his new rifle, and intimidate protestors with implied threats.
 
Wrong.
What Grosskreutz meant and can easily be seen in the video, is that at first he pointed his pistol, but they raised it to the air.
The pistol was NOT at all aimed any where near to Kyle when Kyle pulled the trigger.
You are confused Moon Bat.

The jury is the one that determined what that shithead Grosskreutz meant to say. Guess what the they decided? That Kyle was innocent of shooting him because Grosskreutz pointed that illegal Glock at him.

It was obvious and blatant to everybody that heard it except you stupid confused hate filled Moon Bats.
 
You are confused Moon Bat.

The jury is the one that determined what that shithead Grosskreutz meant to say. Guess what the they decided? That Kyle was innocent of shooting him because Grosskreutz pointed that illegal Glock at him.

It was obvious and blatant to everybody that heard it except you stupid confused hate filled Moon Bats.

That is ridiculous.
We all SAW the video.
It is clear that when the bullet hit Grosskreutz in the arm, the arm and its pistol were NOT aimed at Kyle.
People hear what they want, but images can not be wrong.
If Grosskreutz had been pointing at Kyle, then we would have seen it in the video, and the bullet would have at most been a parallel graze instead of a perpendicular penetration.
 
That is ridiculous.
We all SAW the video.
It is clear that when the bullet hit Grosskreutz in the arm, the arm and its pistol were NOT aimed at Kyle.
People hear what they want, but images can not be wrong.
If Grosskreutz had been pointing at Kyle, then we would have seen it in the video, and the bullet would have at most been a parallel graze instead of a perpendicular penetration.
It was in his hand, and he was charging him. You agree?
 
Not at all, that was Rosenbaum’s intention and shoot as many as he could. Kyle never even knew he was mental but smart enough to kill him for society

You do not defend against a grab at the rifle with 6 shots at close range, when most likely he did not have to shoot at all.
And he certainly would not have needed to worry about the gun being grabbed if he had not illegally brought it along.
 

Forum List

Back
Top