GunnyL said:
Are you going to quit playing this gradechool game of semantics and get on with it, or what?
Well said and to the point. Nothing but semantics and word games.
Here's my own little "scientific" version:
How Lefties Argue:
Society draws a line. Then the challenging leftist nitpickers come along using their doublespeak and word games which works kinda like this:
The nitpickers see the line but of course claim there is no "real" line. They say if one looks at the drawn line of chalk (aka talk) it is full of molecules which are, relatively speaking, thousands of miles apart so one can't really see the line.
(So you fill in the spaces with molecules (arguments) to make the line whole again)
Then the nitpickers claim again there is no "real" line. They say if one looks at the line of molecules it is full of atoms which are, relatively speaking, millions of miles apart so one can't really see the line.
(So you fill in the spaces with atoms (arguments) to make the line whole once again)
Then the nitpickers claim AGAIN there is no "real" line. They say if one looks at the line of atoms it is full of protons, neutrons, and electrons which are, relatively speaking, billions of miles apart so one can't really see the line.
(So you work again to fill in the spaces with protons, neutrons, and electrons (arguments) to make the line whole yet again)
Then the nitpickers STILL claim there is no "real" line. They say if one looks at the line full of protons, neutrons, and electrons…..well you get the idea….at this sub level is where you will find the quarks and the larks…