know what really causes homosexuality....

[Chips Rafferty]

can someone translate that? sounds like doniston had a stroke while typing.

I think Donnie has many strokes while typing....

 

[Chips Rafferty]

Since Doniston is a peusodium--- it isn't likely.

You mean “shoedoh intalecshul”, don’t you, Donnie?

 

[RightWingSpirit]

I think Donnie has many strokes while typing....

yes, the kind that leaves one unable to speak or type coherently.

 

[doniston]

go to bed old man, you're getting your wrinkled ass handed to you.

Is that you Pale_rider???

 

[doniston]

go to bed old man, you're getting your wrinkled ass handed to you.

You mean that you and Chips wants to beleive that. no one else is likely to.

 

[mattskramer]

Okay RWS. You are down by 1 punch. In the next round I recommend a few right jabs.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

So let me get this straight. Mutual masturbation is not allowed. Oral sex is not allowed. I guess that there would only be a few days each month in which sex would be allowed (when a woman is ready). Condoms are not allowed. Am I correct so far? Perhaps we show make these Biblical rules into US law.

They are not Biblical.

 

[mattskramer]

They are not Biblical.

Here is some Biblical stuff:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/showpost.php?p=611433&postcount=150

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You are aware medically it is adviced not to have sex for a woman that gave birth for at LEAST 6 weeks?

 

[mattskramer]

You are aware medically it is adviced not to have sex for a woman that gave birth for at LEAST 6 weeks?

No, but should we make it a law? My point is that the argument people throw up that homosexual behavior should not be allowed because God supposedly does not approve is easily knocked down. First of all, there are many bizarre admonitions and instructions in the Bible. Are those to be made into laws? I doubt that even the most self-righteous Bible-believing “Christian” would tolerate such conditions. Secondarily, there are atheists in America. One does not have to believe in the existence – much less the Bible as being valid, to be an American. That is my point.

 

[mattskramer]

No, but should we make it a law? My point is that the argument people throw up that homosexual behavior should not be allowed because God supposedly does not approve is easily knocked down. First of all, there are many bizarre admonitions and instructions in the Bible. Are those to be made into laws? I doubt that even the most self-righteous Bible-believing “Christian” would tolerate such conditions. Secondarily, there are atheists in America. One does not have to believe in the existence – much less the Bible as being valid, to be an American. That is my point.

Wow. Check out:

http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/chapter10.html

There is so much interesting stuff that it brings to light. For example:

A widow experiencing pleasure while she’s still alive, on the other hand, is already dead in the afterlife. In the author’s eyes, the only respectable widows are at least sixty years old, have had only one husband, and have been well known for their positive accomplishments in life. In contrast, younger widows aren’t worth assisting because they eventually remarry, become idle, or venture from house to house with their gossip (1 Timothy 5:5-15).

 

[Chips Rafferty]

I have no objections to gays, I just don't like that retarded doniston character.

Did you hear about when Donnie and Ethyl were first courting and she came in season and begged him to "Give me the whole 7 inches and HURT me!".......so he "made loved" (is that Chrischunlly correct language?) her three times and blackened both her eyes!

 

[RightWingSpirit]

Did you hear about when Donnie and Ethyl were first courting and she came in season and begged him to "Give me the whole 7 inches and HURT me!".......so he "made loved" (is that Chrischunlly correct language?) her three times and blackened both her eyes!

no but I remember when June said "You were a little hard on the Beaver last night" to Ward.

*rimshot

 

[midcan5]

no but I remember when June said "You were a little hard on the Beaver last night" to Ward.

Leave it to the Beave, ah, the days, everyone dressed for dinner, polite civil language was the rule, no blacks or gays existed yet, and everyone smoked. lol

 

[doniston]

Did you hear about when Donnie and Ethyl were first courting and she came in season and begged him to "Give me the whole 7 inches and HURT me!".......so he "made loved" (is that Chrischunlly correct language?) her three times and blackened both her eyes!

Sounds like RJS fronm another site, who's main schtick was to make up outlandous stories, and expect people to beleive them. I finally just started responding to him with:

......................................

I think I will do the same here.

 

[AllieBaba]

The so-called bizarre laws you are referring were laws given to Moses, primarily, when the Jews were nomads wandering around the desert. They had no law, they had been slaves for so long they had no structured society of their own. So God gave them some laws and hence you have the ten commandments and all the "laws" in Leviticus and Numbers.

But in the New Testament, Jesus FULFILLED the law, making the old laws obsolete. Jesus said the only law we needed to worry about anymore was to love one another, and the rest would follow.

So if you're going to bash the Bible and use it as the example of ridiculous law making, kindly take a little time to actually read and understand it so you can make the argument intelligently.

Homosexuality is a choice, by the way. It has nothing to do with genetics. Right or wrong, people choose to be homosexual at some point in their lives. To then try to blame it on science or genetics is a cop out and actually enrages many homosexuals.

 

[Larkinn]

Homosexuality is a choice, by the way. It has nothing to do with genetics. Right or wrong, people choose to be homosexual at some point in their lives. To then try to blame it on science or genetics is a cop out and actually enrages many homosexuals.

Any evidence to back that up, or is that just a bizarre form of brainwashing?

 

[mattskramer]

The so-called bizarre laws you are referring were laws given to Moses, primarily, when the Jews were nomads wandering around the desert. They had no law, they had been slaves for so long they had no structured society of their own. So God gave them some laws and hence you have the ten commandments and all the "laws" in Leviticus and Numbers.

But in the New Testament, Jesus FULFILLED the law, making the old laws obsolete. Jesus said the only law we needed to worry about anymore was to love one another, and the rest would follow.

So if you're going to bash the Bible and use it as the example of ridiculous law making, kindly take a little time to actually read and understand it so you can make the argument intelligently.

Homosexuality is a choice, by the way. It has nothing to do with genetics. Right or wrong, people choose to be homosexual at some point in their lives. To then try to blame it on science or genetics is a cop out and actually enrages many homosexuals.

Sigh. Look at the web site again. It provides many examples of bizarre admonitions and instructions in the New Testament too. The book of Timothy (a passage tht I actually quoted here) is in the New Testament.

 

[AllieBaba]

Actually, yes. The studies have been made, the point isn't even argued anymore in the scientific community.
The Human Genome Progect, the Hamer study are just two studies which have shown there isn't such a thing as genetic sexual hardwiring. Read up.

 

[AllieBaba]

And Timothy is an example of direction being given to a group of people who are out of control.

Jesus told us to love each other and the rest would follow. That's the only law we need to take to heart.

I don't believe sodomy is an example of showing love for another person. Neither is cheating on your spouse, or stealing your neighbor's things. So you can see how that works.