know what really causes homosexuality....

[Chips Rafferty]

I have no Idea from whence you got that quote, but I do remember him say that, in the past. What I don't understand is that he thinks anal intercourse with a man is an abondomation. it is perrfectly ok to do the same identical thing to a woman. I have never felt the need or desire to do that with either male or female---(or animal) To me that is not sex, ---just disgustingly gross.

Do you think that if you grew up in a culture that regards rumpy-pumpy as a communally approved optional sextra, you might be perpetually pestering your spouse/sheila for a bit of super taut dung-funnel fun?

What about if your wife/woman grew up in a country that regards regular rectum incursion as an almost de rigueur part of "love making." (Chrischun code for you-know-what)

What would you do if your supposed shrinking-violet WASP spouse/sheila confessed she detested your white-bread WASP-on-top "sex" and has been hanging out for a bit of bum-splitting abumination all her married life.

Would you put a packet of condoms on your cock, purchase a box of air-sick bags, then don a one-holed body bag and buggerize her in a chemical hazard shower, for the sake of your "lurve" for her?

What is wifey offered to digitally stimulate you prostate gland when you are on the vinegar strokes, or, horror of horrors, offered to rose-leaf you, would you refuse?

 

[doniston]

Do you think that if you grew up in a culture that regards rumpy-pumpy as a communally approved optional sextra, you might be perpetually pestering your spouse/sheila for a bit of super taut dung-funnel fun?

What about if your wife/woman grew up in a country that regards regular rectum incursion as an almost de rigueur part of "love making." (Chrischun code for you-know-what)

What would you do if your supposed shrinking-violet WASP spouse/sheila confessed she detested your white-bread WASP-on-top "sex" and has been hanging out for a bit of bum-splitting abumination all her married life.

Would you put a packet of condoms on your cock, purchase a box of air-sick bags, then don a one-holed body bag and buggerize her in a chemical hazard shower, for the sake of your "lurve" for her?

What is wifey offered to digitally stimulate you prostate gland when you are on the vinegar strokes, or, horror of horrors, offered to rose-leaf you, would you refuse?

I don't have the slightest Idea what some of what you are mouthing off about means or suggests, but if it has anything to do with Anal sex, Scatological issues, or serious bondage or torture, you can bet your bottom dollar that I would refuse such offers, and have nothing further to do with her.

 

[midcan5]

lol - Chips has read too much Henry Miller.

"The traditional Christian doctrine was summarized in the 13th century by the theologian Thomas Aquinas who declared that God allowed sexual intercourse only

• for the right purpose (i.e., procreation),
• with the right person (i.e., the marriage partner), and
• in the right way (i.e., by means of coitus).
Any sexual activity that did not meet this triple standard was "unnatural" and sinful.

http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/ATLAS_EN/html/problematic_sexual_behavior.html

History knows of some human cultures which accepted nearly all forms of sexual behavior as divinely inspired and therefore natural. These cultures were not necessarily liberal or permissive in the modern sense, but they had room for many different erotic tastes. Individuals were usually left alone to pursue their personal sexual interests and were punished only when they violated the rights of others.

However, our own Judeo-Christian culture is built on quite another tradition. The ancient Israelites as well as the early and medieval Christians believed that the only natural purpose of sex was procreation, and therefore they were extremely intolerant of any nonprocreative sexual activity. For example, the Bible reports that in Israel male homosexual intercourse and sexual contact with animals were punished by death, a custom which survived for more than a thousand years in Christian Europe. Even today, many states in the United States continue to treat these harmless behaviors as crimes."

 

[Doug]

If you really really truly just cannot stand gays, then I have just the country for you.

 

[Diuretic]

I wondered what Ahmadinejad was muttering about in an aside from the microphone, he must have said, ".....yet."

 

[Chips Rafferty]

I don't have the slightest Idea what some of what you are mouthing off about means or suggests, but if it has anything to do with Anal sex, Scatological issues, or serious bondage or torture, you can bet your bottom dollar that I would refuse such offers, and have nothing further to do with her.

.....or serious bondage or torture, you can bet your bottom dollar D good one, Don!) that I would refuse such offers, and have nothing further to do with her.

So a bit of the ol' dress-up like Black Beard and sexually humiliate and "rape" the fair-maiden-tied-to-the-mainmast is quite acceptable to you, eh?

What about Pastor Flagon tying you up at gunpoint and then brutallly raping wifey?

Them a women was sobbin', sobbin',
Sobbin' buckets of tears
On account o' old Dobbin,
Doniston' really rattled their rears.

Oh they acted angry and annoyed
But secretly they was overjoyed…

BTW, if you find something like this hidden in Hannah’s underwear drawer, don’t let her bullshit you that it is a woman’s “sanitary device.”

 

[Chips Rafferty]

I wondered what Ahmadinejad was muttering about in an aside from the microphone, he must have said, ".....yet."

Did you hear about the sly grog (“bootleg” to you Bubbas) butcher?.....he was caught taking meat up the back passage…

 

[Chips Rafferty]

lol - Chips has read too much Henry Miller.

"The traditional Christian doctrine was summarized in the 13th century by the theologian Thomas Aquinas who declared that God allowed sexual intercourse only

• for the right purpose (i.e., procreation),
• with the right person (i.e., the marriage partner), and
• in the right way (i.e., by means of coitus).
Any sexual activity that did not meet this triple standard was "unnatural" and sinful.

http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/ATLAS_EN/html/problematic_sexual_behavior.html

History knows of some human cultures which accepted nearly all forms of sexual behavior as divinely inspired and therefore natural. These cultures were not necessarily liberal or permissive in the modern sense, but they had room for many different erotic tastes. Individuals were usually left alone to pursue their personal sexual interests and were punished only when they violated the rights of others.

However, our own Judeo-Christian culture is built on quite another tradition. The ancient Israelites as well as the early and medieval Christians believed that the only natural purpose of sex was procreation, and therefore they were extremely intolerant of any nonprocreative sexual activity. For example, the Bible reports that in Israel male homosexual intercourse and sexual contact with animals were punished by death, a custom which survived for more than a thousand years in Christian Europe. Even today, many states in the United States continue to treat these harmless behaviors as crimes."

• in the right way (i.e., by means of coitus).

..as opposed to quoitus.

It's alright, Dee gets it!

 

[Diuretic]

Did you hear about the sly grog (“bootleg” to you Bubbas) butcher?.....he was caught taking meat up the back passage…

Bring back WWII and all those meat restrictions

 

[Diuretic]

..as opposed to quoitus.

It's alright, Dee gets it!

I do - rhymes with "deck coits".

 

[RightWingSpirit]

I have no objections to gays, I just don't like that retarded doniston character.

 

[mattskramer]

lol - Chips has read too much Henry Miller.

"The traditional Christian doctrine was summarized in the 13th century by the theologian Thomas Aquinas who declared that God allowed sexual intercourse only

• for the right purpose (i.e., procreation),
• with the right person (i.e., the marriage partner), and
• in the right way (i.e., by means of coitus).
Any sexual activity that did not meet this triple standard was "unnatural" and sinful.

http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/ATLAS_EN/html/problematic_sexual_behavior.html

History knows of some human cultures which accepted nearly all forms of sexual behavior as divinely inspired and therefore natural. These cultures were not necessarily liberal or permissive in the modern sense, but they had room for many different erotic tastes. Individuals were usually left alone to pursue their personal sexual interests and were punished only when they violated the rights of others.

However, our own Judeo-Christian culture is built on quite another tradition. The ancient Israelites as well as the early and medieval Christians believed that the only natural purpose of sex was procreation, and therefore they were extremely intolerant of any nonprocreative sexual activity. For example, the Bible reports that in Israel male homosexual intercourse and sexual contact with animals were punished by death, a custom which survived for more than a thousand years in Christian Europe. Even today, many states in the United States continue to treat these harmless behaviors as crimes."

So let me get this straight. Mutual masturbation is not allowed. Oral sex is not allowed. I guess that there would only be a few days each month in which sex would be allowed (when a woman is ready). Condoms are not allowed. Am I correct so far? Perhaps we show make these Biblical rules into US law.

 

[doniston]

So a bit of the ol' dress-up like Black Beard and sexually humiliate and "rape" the fair-maiden-tied-to-the-mainmast is quite acceptable to you, eh?

What about Pastor Flagon tying you up at gunpoint and then brutallly raping wifey?

Them a women was sobbin', sobbin',
Sobbin' buckets of tears
On account o' old Dobbin,
Doniston' really rattled their rears.

Oh they acted angry and annoyed
But secretly they was overjoyed…

BTW, if you find something like this hidden in Hannah’s underwear drawer, don’t let her bullshit you that it is a woman’s “sanitary device.”

You are getting more stupid all the time.

 

[doniston]

I have no objections to gays, I just don't like that retarded doniston character.

HA HA. ---whoever the hell you are.----doesn't make me no never-mind if you don't like me.

 

[Chips Rafferty]

So let me get this straight. Mutual masturbation is not allowed. Oral sex is not allowed. I guess that there would only be a few days each month in which sex would be allowed (when a woman is ready). Condoms are not allowed. Am I correct so far? Perhaps we show make these Biblical rules into US law.

You'd think God would have put a woman's ***** in a more salubrious, more antiseptic, more accessible neighbourhood, wouldn't you? Like in between her breasts or on her forehead.

I wonder why He didn’t make our wedding tackle detachable, so we could watch them doing "IT," cheer them on, and award performance points - like diving judges?

That way there wouldn't be any wet spots or snail trails on the sheets after the fu...er, "love-making" for MEN to sleep in.

We could just throw them on the bedroom floor, BOTH roll over and go to sleep after the procreation process, and rinse them out in the morning!

 

[RightWingSpirit]

HA HA. ---whoever the hell you are.----doesn't make me no never-mind if you don't like me.

can someone translate that? sounds like doniston had a stroke while typing.

 

[Chips Rafferty]

You are getting more stupid all the time.

I just got a pleading, absolutely pornographic post from an Ethyl Doniston. Any relation?

 

[doniston]

I just got a pleading, absolutely pornographic post from a Ethyl Doniston. Any relation?

Since Doniston is a peusodium--- it isn't likely.

 

[doniston]

can someone translate that? sounds like doniston had a stroke while typing.

an idiotic comment if I ever heard one. try again dummy

 

[RightWingSpirit]

an idiotic comment if I ever heard one. try again dummy

go to bed old man, you're getting your wrinkled ass handed to you.