Know-Nothings Gone Wild

No on the worlds foremost expert on culture and race relations I get asked to speak quite frequently, I actually get a lot of requests from posting on here

Then you did not speak at MIT 2 months ago. According to the MIT main calendar, there was only one event under Conferences/Seminars/Lectures. And that was on the Vedas.

So you have, once again, been caught lying.
It was a Intimate setting of the worlds foremost leaders on culture

YOu claimed you are paid to speak at universities and then said you did so at MIT 2 months ago.

Intimate setting or not, it would be on the MIT calendar. It isn't.

Especially if you were paid to be there.
I asked to have it taken down so I can remain Anonymous,,

They would have removed your name, but would not have removed the event.
I asked him to make it disappear,I work with college Republicans across the state of Massachusetts
 
Then you did not speak at MIT 2 months ago. According to the MIT main calendar, there was only one event under Conferences/Seminars/Lectures. And that was on the Vedas.

So you have, once again, been caught lying.
It was a Intimate setting of the worlds foremost leaders on culture

YOu claimed you are paid to speak at universities and then said you did so at MIT 2 months ago.

Intimate setting or not, it would be on the MIT calendar. It isn't.

Especially if you were paid to be there.
I asked to have it taken down so I can remain Anonymous,,

They would have removed your name, but would not have removed the event.
I asked him to make it disappear,I work with college Republicans across the state of Massachusetts

LMAO!! Suuure you did. They took an event down from the calendar, rather than just remove your name, because you asked.

I really doubt MIT would do that.
 
It was a Intimate setting of the worlds foremost leaders on culture

YOu claimed you are paid to speak at universities and then said you did so at MIT 2 months ago.

Intimate setting or not, it would be on the MIT calendar. It isn't.

Especially if you were paid to be there.
I asked to have it taken down so I can remain Anonymous,,

They would have removed your name, but would not have removed the event.
I asked him to make it disappear,I work with college Republicans across the state of Massachusetts

LMAO!! Suuure you did. They took an event down from the calendar, rather than just remove your name, because you asked.

I really doubt MIT would do that.
You also don’t believe in the Constitution
 
YOu claimed you are paid to speak at universities and then said you did so at MIT 2 months ago.

Intimate setting or not, it would be on the MIT calendar. It isn't.

Especially if you were paid to be there.
I asked to have it taken down so I can remain Anonymous,,

They would have removed your name, but would not have removed the event.
I asked him to make it disappear,I work with college Republicans across the state of Massachusetts

LMAO!! Suuure you did. They took an event down from the calendar, rather than just remove your name, because you asked.

I really doubt MIT would do that.
You also don’t believe in the Constitution

I absolutely do. I just also believe the US Supreme Court justices and not felons.
 
I asked to have it taken down so I can remain Anonymous,,

They would have removed your name, but would not have removed the event.
I asked him to make it disappear,I work with college Republicans across the state of Massachusetts

LMAO!! Suuure you did. They took an event down from the calendar, rather than just remove your name, because you asked.

I really doubt MIT would do that.
You also don’t believe in the Constitution

I absolutely do. I just also believe the US Supreme Court justices and not felons.
You just said a man can protect his family. Now you do? Wtf ?
 
Then you did not speak at MIT 2 months ago. According to the MIT main calendar, there was only one event under Conferences/Seminars/Lectures. And that was on the Vedas.

So you have, once again, been caught lying.
It was a Intimate setting of the worlds foremost leaders on culture


You’re not funny, kid.
Just facts


It’s just not funny, kid.
Neither is your transsexual profile picture


No one wants to hear about your fantasies, freak.
 
I can prove you are lying.

You claim to get paid for speaking at universities. YOu even stated that you were paid to speak at Harvard in 2018 and MIT 2 months ago.

That is a lie, unless you are some sort of expert on the Vedas (Vedas are ancient Hindu scriptures).
No on the worlds foremost expert on culture and race relations I get asked to speak quite frequently, I actually get a lot of requests from posting on here

Then you did not speak at MIT 2 months ago. According to the MIT main calendar, there was only one event under Conferences/Seminars/Lectures. And that was on the Vedas.

So you have, once again, been caught lying.
It was a Intimate setting of the worlds foremost leaders on culture

YOu claimed you are paid to speak at universities and then said you did so at MIT 2 months ago.

Intimate setting or not, it would be on the MIT calendar. It isn't.

Especially if you were paid to be there.
I asked to have it taken down so I can remain Anonymous,,

Still not funny, kid.
 
They would have removed your name, but would not have removed the event.
I asked him to make it disappear,I work with college Republicans across the state of Massachusetts

LMAO!! Suuure you did. They took an event down from the calendar, rather than just remove your name, because you asked.

I really doubt MIT would do that.
You also don’t believe in the Constitution

I absolutely do. I just also believe the US Supreme Court justices and not felons.
You just said a man can protect his family. Now you do? Wtf ?

Yes, I have no problem with you protecting your family (if you ever have one). I do, however, agree that you should not able to own a gun.
 
Then you did not speak at MIT 2 months ago. According to the MIT main calendar, there was only one event under Conferences/Seminars/Lectures. And that was on the Vedas.

So you have, once again, been caught lying.
It was a Intimate setting of the worlds foremost leaders on culture

YOu claimed you are paid to speak at universities and then said you did so at MIT 2 months ago.

Intimate setting or not, it would be on the MIT calendar. It isn't.

Especially if you were paid to be there.
I asked to have it taken down so I can remain Anonymous,,

They would have removed your name, but would not have removed the event.
I asked him to make it disappear,I work with college Republicans across the state of Massachusetts


Not funny.
 
I asked him to make it disappear,I work with college Republicans across the state of Massachusetts

LMAO!! Suuure you did. They took an event down from the calendar, rather than just remove your name, because you asked.

I really doubt MIT would do that.
You also don’t believe in the Constitution

I absolutely do. I just also believe the US Supreme Court justices and not felons.
You just said a man can protect his family. Now you do? Wtf ?

Yes, I have no problem with you protecting your family (if you ever have one). I do, however, agree that you should not able to own a gun.
Do your against a man protecting his family... you are a sick fcuk ,, anti American coward and can’t wait to say it to your coward face in the city of liberty, Boston.
 
LMAO!! Suuure you did. They took an event down from the calendar, rather than just remove your name, because you asked.

I really doubt MIT would do that.
You also don’t believe in the Constitution

I absolutely do. I just also believe the US Supreme Court justices and not felons.
You just said a man can protect his family. Now you do? Wtf ?

Yes, I have no problem with you protecting your family (if you ever have one). I do, however, agree that you should not able to own a gun.
Do your against a man protecting his family... you are a sick fcuk ,, anti American coward and can’t wait to say it to your coward face in the city of liberty, Boston.

And I will call you a liar. I have said I am all for a man protecting his family.
 
You also don’t believe in the Constitution

I absolutely do. I just also believe the US Supreme Court justices and not felons.
You just said a man can protect his family. Now you do? Wtf ?

Yes, I have no problem with you protecting your family (if you ever have one). I do, however, agree that you should not able to own a gun.
Do your against a man protecting his family... you are a sick fcuk ,, anti American coward and can’t wait to say it to your coward face in the city of liberty, Boston.

And I will call you a liar. I have said I am all for a man protecting his family.
How can a man protect his family against men with guns with no gun?
 
15th post
You also don’t believe in the Constitution

I absolutely do. I just also believe the US Supreme Court justices and not felons.
You just said a man can protect his family. Now you do? Wtf ?

Yes, I have no problem with you protecting your family (if you ever have one). I do, however, agree that you should not able to own a gun.
Do your against a man protecting his family... you are a sick fcuk ,, anti American coward and can’t wait to say it to your coward face in the city of liberty, Boston.

And I will call you a liar. I have said I am all for a man protecting his family.
No you said he can’t have a gun.. how can you protect your family against men with guns with no gun?
 
I absolutely do. I just also believe the US Supreme Court justices and not felons.
You just said a man can protect his family. Now you do? Wtf ?

Yes, I have no problem with you protecting your family (if you ever have one). I do, however, agree that you should not able to own a gun.
Do your against a man protecting his family... you are a sick fcuk ,, anti American coward and can’t wait to say it to your coward face in the city of liberty, Boston.

And I will call you a liar. I have said I am all for a man protecting his family.
How can a man protect his family against men with guns with no gun?

Shit happens.
 
I absolutely do. I just also believe the US Supreme Court justices and not felons.
You just said a man can protect his family. Now you do? Wtf ?

Yes, I have no problem with you protecting your family (if you ever have one). I do, however, agree that you should not able to own a gun.
Do your against a man protecting his family... you are a sick fcuk ,, anti American coward and can’t wait to say it to your coward face in the city of liberty, Boston.

And I will call you a liar. I have said I am all for a man protecting his family.
No you said he can’t have a gun.. how can you protect your family against men with guns with no gun?

If you are a convicted felon, I suggest mace or some sort of taser/hotstick. And perhaps you should have thought of that before you kicked a man when he was down and then accepted a plea deal that made you a convicted felon.

If you cannot protect your family without a firearm, I would also suggest that you buy an antique black powder revolver. They are not covered by the Gun Control Act of 1968. They are lethal at reasonable ranges and you have multiple shots.
 
You just said a man can protect his family. Now you do? Wtf ?

Yes, I have no problem with you protecting your family (if you ever have one). I do, however, agree that you should not able to own a gun.
Do your against a man protecting his family... you are a sick fcuk ,, anti American coward and can’t wait to say it to your coward face in the city of liberty, Boston.

And I will call you a liar. I have said I am all for a man protecting his family.
How can a man protect his family against men with guns with no gun?

Shit happens.
So anti constitutionalist
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom