When you violate the Order of a Court, in letter and principal, you need to go to jail.
kim "sanctity of marriage but married four times" walker, doesn't understand the English language or the fact that when the Court tells you to do something... you do it.
loon.....
Kim Davis went back to work as a Kentucky county clerk last week after a stint in jail and a pledge that she wouldn't interfere with deputies who were issuing wedding licenses to same-sex couples.
But in a court motion filed Monday, the American Civil Liberties Union said that she was doing just that.
After returning to her job on Sept. 14 as the Rowan County clerk, the filing said, Davis "immediately" began meddling with licenses that the office's deputy clerk, Brian Mason, was issuing.
Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis Is Meddling and Altering Marriage Licenses, ACLU Says
and no... no religion requires you to be a bigot... and if she can't do her job, the wacko bird, hypocrite needs to quit.
Go **** yourself.
what kind of ******* dumb **** wants someone to go to jail over a court ruling but is ok with illegals raping and murdering people?
a dumb leftist **** hypocrite that is so full of ******* hate for anyone that disagrees with her that she looks the other way when someone is raped to get pissed at ONE ******* PERSON.
rot in hell
people go to jail for ciminal contempt all the time.
but feel free to accept your own invitation, lowlife.
ruin one persons life b/c they don't bow to your tyranny and let another commit rape and murder.
yea, it's exactly the same.
In a bent a truly evil kind of way.
This is ridiculous, ignorant, and wrong.
No one's life is being 'ruined.'
The Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law are not 'tyranny.'
Rulings of the Supreme Court become the law of the land, binding on the states and local jurisdictions, including county clerks. As an officer of the state Davis took an oath to obey and defend the Constitution of the United States, an oath she violated.
When Davis refused to follow a just, proper, and Constitutional court order, she made the decision to go to jail, a decision she made of her own free will, in no way 'violating' her 'religious liberty.'
Indeed, this issue has nothing to do with the First Amendment, no Free Exercise Clause issues are at stake.
Davis has only herself to blame for what has happened to her, or what might happen in the future, the consequence of her failure to respect and follow the rule of law and the Constitution.