Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,078
- 1,130
just ignoring it.
Kim Davis Is Winning
- Thread starter Preacher
- Start date
just ignoring it.
Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,078
- 1,130
What the hell does the GOP have to do with a democrat? Don't you mean that Davis needs sent back to the democrat re-education camp?
More than the black girl who climbed that flagpole. She's a right wing darling. Hypocrite poster child.
TyroneSlothrop
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #565
True specially after all the Democratic candidates came to support her release ...oh wait...
TyroneSlothrop
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #567
Kim Davis is sick....
Researchers working with the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine evaluated the mental health of 560 Italian University students to see what connections could be found between their psychological traits and their propensity for homophobia. Indeed, they found that aspects of psychoticism and immature defense mechanisms were significant predictors for homophobic attitudes.
“We found that psychoticism represented an important risk factor for homophobia, demonstrating that pathologic personality traits are involved in homophobic attitudes,” the study explains. Psychoticism embodies various characteristics, but above all, “severe psychopathologic conditions, such as delusion, isolation, and interpersonal alienation, but also hostility and anger.” Homophobia could be partially linked by “pathologic trait of personality,” meaning that various disorders of relationship and thought could be predictive of homophobia.
Immature defense mechanisms similarly predicted homophobic attitudes. These are coping mechanisms activated during states of distress and anxiety and include behaviors like projection, acting out, isolation, denial, passive aggressiveness, and displacement. “Our data revealed that immature defense mechanisms predict homophobia, highlighting that a negative attitude toward homosexuals is influenced once again by dysfunctional aspects of personality.”
Psychoticism, Immature Defense Mechanisms and a Fearful Attachment Style are Associated with a Higher Homophobic Attitude - Ciocca - 2015 - The Journal of Sexual Medicine - Wiley Online Library
New Study Suggests Connections Between Homophobia And Mental Disorders
Researchers working with the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine evaluated the mental health of 560 Italian University students to see what connections could be found between their psychological traits and their propensity for homophobia. Indeed, they found that aspects of psychoticism and immature defense mechanisms were significant predictors for homophobic attitudes.
“We found that psychoticism represented an important risk factor for homophobia, demonstrating that pathologic personality traits are involved in homophobic attitudes,” the study explains. Psychoticism embodies various characteristics, but above all, “severe psychopathologic conditions, such as delusion, isolation, and interpersonal alienation, but also hostility and anger.” Homophobia could be partially linked by “pathologic trait of personality,” meaning that various disorders of relationship and thought could be predictive of homophobia.
Immature defense mechanisms similarly predicted homophobic attitudes. These are coping mechanisms activated during states of distress and anxiety and include behaviors like projection, acting out, isolation, denial, passive aggressiveness, and displacement. “Our data revealed that immature defense mechanisms predict homophobia, highlighting that a negative attitude toward homosexuals is influenced once again by dysfunctional aspects of personality.”
Psychoticism, Immature Defense Mechanisms and a Fearful Attachment Style are Associated with a Higher Homophobic Attitude - Ciocca - 2015 - The Journal of Sexual Medicine - Wiley Online Library
New Study Suggests Connections Between Homophobia And Mental Disorders
Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,078
- 1,130
Care to post some links?
Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,078
- 1,130
never polled them and that isn't the issue.
TyroneSlothrop
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #572
Attachments
HappyJoy
Platinum Member
- Apr 15, 2015
- 32,056
- 5,942
- 1,140
- Banned
- #573
They are pretty much all against gay marriage. Many of them outright support Kim Davis, some are skirting the issue saying ridiculous things like there should be a way to accommodate her views even though she wasn't letting anyone in her office issue licenses.
Here is a good scorecard.
With that that said. The only Democrat I see supporting Kim Davis is Kim Davis. There is no major support from her in the Democrats, it's all coming from religious conservative wingnuts.
WorldWatcher
Platinum Member
You know that Ms. Davis's own marriage license doesn't have the signature of the previous County Clerk on it right? (That clerk being her own mother.)
>>>>
LOki
The Yaweh of Mischief
- Mar 26, 2006
- 4,084
- 359
- 85
She has NO RIGHT as an agent of the government to impose her religious beliefs upon others. She is in NO WAY empowered as an agent of the government to impose her religious beliefs upon others. She is quite literally prohibited from doing so.
No one--literally NO ONE--is abridging her right to find gay marriage abhorrent, or telling her to personally sanction, or agree with, the practice.
She is not personally sanctioning these marriages that she personally finds repugnant... she's certifying that licensees have met the legal requirements (of the government she freely chose to be the agent of) for obtaining said license.
If she wishes, she can personally approve or disapprove of any marriage she chooses. She can issue or deny (legally meaningless) marriage licenses of her own devising as she wishes.
Her job--her legally and morally binding obligation--is to issue those licenses. PERIOD.
Requiring Kim Davis to do the job she earnestly sought to do and freely chose to accept, is NO ABRIDGMENT of her rights, religious or otherwise.
But when acting as an agent of the government, she refuses to issue any license (for reasons other than those proscribed by law), she is simply not doing her job, and is in fact denying law abiding folks exercise of their rights and/or legal privileges, and certainly the benefits thereof.
Using her office to impose her bullshit religion upon others is illegal--this is not a theocracy--no matter how badly the superstitious retards in this country demand that this is a Christian nation--and Kim Davis is not the Grand Priestess of any religion that this country is allegedly founded upon. When she interposed her bullshit religion into the bullshit state licensing machine, she did not make things better for anyone. She did not do the right thing.
She is just wrong on every level. She is a criminal.
Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,941
- 265
Here is a good scorecard.
With that that said. The only Democrat I see supporting Kim Davis is Kim Davis. There is no major support from her in the Democrats, it's all coming from religious conservative wingnuts.
*takes Chris Christie off list of potential canditates to vote for*
Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,941
- 265
She had the office before June's illegal ruling. She doesn't have to give up her career because of a secular law that tries to force her into disobeying the warning in Jude 1 of the mortal sin of abetting the spread of the homosexual cult into normal society using God's sacred hub of society (marriage). She literally had a choice "Follow the new secular "law" and go to hell for eternity or don't follow the brand new (illegally gotten) law and go to jail". She made the right choice. She did not want her name affixed to her own eternal death certificate.
Similar threads
- Poll
New Topics
-
Wasn’t it really the left who made Trump fire Greg Bovino and now Kristi Noem?- Started by BrokeLoser
- Replies: 4
-
-
-
-
