PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #581
For the young ones she has to issue, or she has to be out of the county, like back in jail one county over. Either works for me, but not her...
Kim Davis...and the Judge's "mistake"
- Thread starter nat4900
- Start date
- Moderator
- #582
What ever, nite.
PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #583
Spanked ya again. See ya. And next time, do your homework...
I had a Revelation...
It does not have to be one way or the other.
There is such a thing as COMPROMISE, although it seems like this is something of the Ancient Past....
This is a fairly new ruling by the SC and States need to work out what they can do, to satisfy BOTH sides.
Easy peasy, it can be worked out if level heads prevail.
This woman was picked to be the case that gets spotlighted, or she volunteered to be the case...lawyer-ed up.... this was inevitable, someone had to do it and get the law cleared up on this State's end, and other states will follow with an organized rule or legislative rule, on how to handle clerks who object for religious reasons, while still accommodating the citizens who want marriage licenses in their own county.
She won't be fired, she won't be indefinitely jailed, she won't have to quit, she, personally, won't have to sign the marriage license....
It does not have to be one way or the other.
There is such a thing as COMPROMISE, although it seems like this is something of the Ancient Past....
This is a fairly new ruling by the SC and States need to work out what they can do, to satisfy BOTH sides.
Easy peasy, it can be worked out if level heads prevail.
This woman was picked to be the case that gets spotlighted, or she volunteered to be the case...lawyer-ed up.... this was inevitable, someone had to do it and get the law cleared up on this State's end, and other states will follow with an organized rule or legislative rule, on how to handle clerks who object for religious reasons, while still accommodating the citizens who want marriage licenses in their own county.
She won't be fired, she won't be indefinitely jailed, she won't have to quit, she, personally, won't have to sign the marriage license....
Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
The couples that sued don't want her jailed or fined...they wanted a ******* license. As long as her office is issuing the licenses, there's no problem. She doesn't have to do a damn thing and a reasonable accommodation for her can be made. She chose not to allow the reasonable accommodation. She wouldn't let anyone else in her office issue the license. This was all on Davis and her alone.
Yes, I did read something on this Board about this, but I believe I also read that the finite law, makes her sign the marriage certificates if she is in the county....and it is THIS part of the law that needs to be changed or rewritten with more clarity or something of the sort....
Oh, no doubt in my head that she was CHOSEN or VOLUNTEERED to be the case/martyr....I read an article last night that was written in June that had interviews with Kentucky County Clerks and how they were going to handle the SC ruling if it ruled against their State, (their State was one of the States that had their case making it to the Supreme Court)....anyway there were county clerks that were fine, other than worrying about how to get all of their paperwork changed that mentioned female/male as the couple being married, BUT there were several County Clerks that said they would need to reread their contracts, the finite laws, and consult with their lawyers....
So this has been in the MAKING for quite some time....
It was STAGED in my humble opinion...and that's sad in a way.... it's too bad this all could not have been worked out by their legislature BEFORE they went on vacation and right after the ruling came down....but it seems the legislature was digging in it's heels and upset about the ruling and maybe even planned this Kim Davis thingy, to happen while they were gone....so that it would make it in to the courts and they could continue to whine about the ruling or whatever....
And pit us all against one another....
Sad, indeed.
thanatos144
Gold Member
Seeing as it is her faith that drive her to be so brave why haven't you? The founders were not afraid of faith why are you?
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
thanatos144
Gold Member
A court opinion is not law. The court does not make law. one of the times the court did something like this it caused well over 50 million dead babies
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
- Moderator
- #589
In your dreams, BTW no young ones involved in this case. Sucks to be you.
- Moderator
- #591
No she didn't. She established an office policy in accordance with KY law.
airplanemechanic
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2014
- 22,858
- 19,363
- 2,415
What scares me most about this is our court system says that with the exception of the most egregious cases, anyone arrested must be offered bond. This woman was held, FOR A WEEK IN JAIL, WITHOUT BOND. Not even someone arrested for murder is held like that. And what was her offense? Refusing to sign something she didn't agree with and was imposed on her after she took the job.
The fact that liberals think this is ok is scary as hell.
And on top of that, this is a CIVIL matter. She was held in a criminal jail.
The fact that liberals think this is ok is scary as hell.
And on top of that, this is a CIVIL matter. She was held in a criminal jail.
PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #593
There is no bond for Contempt of Court, so don't disobey a court order.
airplanemechanic
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2014
- 22,858
- 19,363
- 2,415
There is no contempt of court. It's a civil matter, not criminal. If shes not doing what they say is her job, you fire her. You don't lock her up.
And on top of that, Kentucky passed a law in 2013 called the freedom of religion act stating that no gov't employee had to do anything that was against their religion.
So believe me, this isn't over yet.
And on top of that, Kentucky passed a law in 2013 called the freedom of religion act stating that no gov't employee had to do anything that was against their religion.
So believe me, this isn't over yet.
PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #595
Not yet but it hardly matters. She's fucked, you just won't admit it.
All we do now is wait for her to be in Contempt and put back behind bars now. Just a few days.
PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #596
How is a gay marriage license against Christianity? Oh right, it isn't.
airplanemechanic
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2014
- 22,858
- 19,363
- 2,415
Um, the bible states homosexuality is an abomination to the Lord. That's plain as day. Obviously you've never read the bible.
WorldWatcher
Platinum Member
There is no Constitutionally valid law in KY that limits marriage based on the gender composition of the couple.
>>>>
airplanemechanic
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2014
- 22,858
- 19,363
- 2,415
Its funny how liberals applaud Muslims for standing up for their religious beliefs but when a Christian does it, lock 'em up!
WorldWatcher
Platinum Member
1. Bond applies in criminal court cases.
2. Bond is not applicable to civil contempt of court proceedings where the purpose is to motivate an individual to comply with a legal court order.
3. Confinement for contempt of court is part of the law, 18 USC 401-403.
>>>>
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Over 1,800 Hezbollah terrorists slain during ‘Roaring Lion’- Started by Pastelli
- Replies: 0
-
My predictions of house and senate for 2026 midterms
- Started by Hurricanelover
- Replies: 0
-
-
LAX authorities arrest Iranian national attempting to traffic arms to Sudan for Islamic regime [racist genocide]
- Started by Thethingsz
- Replies: 1
-
IDFG warns people to be cautious as black bears emerge from hibernation- Started by tyroneweaver
- Replies: 1
