Kennedy Assassination, no conspiracy when it’s documented

[ChrisMarsei14]

They were not difficult shots.

Depends on the conditions. Firing under lab conditions is one thing. Firing for real to kill someone is entirely different.

 

[ChrisMarsei14]

They easily got three shots off BEATING his time.

Again, those are laboratory/textbook conditions. Shooting to kill is entirely different.

 

[ChrisMarsei14]

No I am informed and educated on this subhect

Informed and educated in what way? What are your credentials? Did you take those test shots? Were you on a commission?

 

[candycorn]

Again, those are laboratory/textbook conditions. Shooting to kill is entirely different.

No....no it isn’t. I disagree with Soup on nearly everything but he’s right (for the most part) in this case.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Again, those are laboratory/textbook conditions. Shooting to kill is entirely different.

Irrelevant

If they had not tested it you would complain they did not test it.

they did test it. That is settled he had plenty of time. Your statement is wild assumption

 

[Soupnazi630]

Depends on the conditions. Firing under lab conditions is one thing. Firing for real to kill someone is entirely different.

They were not difficult under any condition.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Did you read it [WC]?

Yes

 

[Soupnazi630]

Many people accept that idea.

No they just want to believe it

 

[Soupnazi630]

If by “all” you mean “none.” Otherwise, you’re wrong as usual.

Maybe. But it’s also what innocent people say, you moron.

The press got nothing much except his claim of having been a patsy. The cops didn’t cover themselves in glory in anything they asked.

Not really. You do tend to buy fantasy when it suits your agenda.

Those, like you, who defend that particular “expert testimony” know nothing at all about forensics.

I don’t doubt that it tumbled after going through the President's back and out of his throat. And there was an indentation on the back of the round, so maybe that’s the part that glances the rib of the Governor. But it continues out of the Governor’s chest and in and out of his wrist fracturing bone on the way before entering the Governor’s thigh.

A rifle shot (rumbling or not) which has sufficient force to shatter bone is going to be far more distorted than that magic bullet.

It isn’t proved at all. Instead, the evidence suggests at least two shooters.

None that a moron like you cares to acknowledge. But I don’t care about your mindlessness.

I can and do say the same about you. But you won’t even admit that the questions raised lead inexorably to the conclusion that it took more than one person to have arranged to kill President Kennedy, do so and then cover it all up.

Far too many perfectly legit questions.

Far too few reasonable answers. Therefore, you lap it all up.

Wrong
.
I mean ALL of your claims have been slapped down and you know it as well

he was questioned and that si that which is contrary to your claim.

Wrong dumbass a bullet which is tunmmbling and has slowed down by passing through two human torsoes is NOT goung to be more damaged you ignorant fool.

Wrong

Oswald acted alone that si what the evidence shows. EVery coaim of your has been proven FALSE which demonstrates that there IS NO evidence of a second shooter/.

That is settled


There are no more legit questions and you ignore every reasonable answer,

 

[BackAgain]

Wrong
.
I mean ALL of your claims have been slapped down and you know it as well

None have, as YOU full well know. You lack the skills and ability to slap down anything I have posted. Also, you lack facts and logic.

Repeating your claims without any ability to support them just confirms that you’re a gullible fool.

That’s settled.

 

[Soupnazi630]

None have, as YOU full well know. You lack the skills and ability to slap down anything I have posted. Also, you lack facts and logic.

Repeating your claims without any ability to support them just confirms that you’re a gullible fool.

That’s settled.

yes gthey have and you know this

I have absolutely proven you wrong with facts and at this point you are just a childish liar

I did support them proving you wrong *****

That is settled

 

[ChrisMarsei14]

Irrelevant

Relevant.

 

[ChrisMarsei14]

If they had not tested it you would complain they did not test it.

logic fail

 

[ChrisMarsei14]

they did test it. That is settled he had plenty of time.

Plenty of time under calm conditions, not Oswald conditions.

 

[ChrisMarsei14]

Your statement is wild assumption

Oh, the irony.

 

[ChrisMarsei14]

They were not difficult under any condition.

Incorrect. Calm vs duress. Night vs day.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Incorrect. Calm vs duress. Night vs day.

I was correct they were easy shots under any circumstances

 

[ChrisMarsei14]

Did you read it [WC]?

Yes

Why?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Plenty of time under calm conditions, not Oswald conditions.

Yes under any conditions that is proven fact

 

[Soupnazi630]

Why?

To know what it says